Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM07697
Parcel: 11502329L

Address:
1855 N 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T16CM07697
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/11/2016 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide automatic faucets for the restroom lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucets will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.
2. Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.
3. Coordinate detail 4/P9.1 with the plumbing plan on sheet P1.1: is it P-4 or P-6 located in the break room?
4. Clarify the locations of WH-1/RP-1 and WH-2/RP-2 with respect to sheet note #19 on P1.1.
10/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
10/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation for the computer room (127) using the current code. Reference: Sections 403.2 and 403.3, IMC 2012.
2. Coordinate the sequence of operation for EF-4 with the electrical plans. The mechanical equipment schedule calls for a time clock to operate the fan while the electrical design specifies operation based on a hydrogen gas detector in the UPS room. Reference: Section 502.4, IMC 2012.
3. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor 122 as a return air duct (see rooms 124 and 125). Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.
11/04/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE.
#1. Ref: Plan Sheet E6.0.
Panel 'ACA' load calculation (216 amps) exceeds the capacity of the panel 200 amps.
#2. Provide complete compliance with the TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE for the exterior lighting.
Ref; 2011 NEC art. 408, TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTIN CODE.
11/07/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
2. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW (OCCUPANT LOAD): THE SF/OCCUPANT FACTOR USED FOR THE 'SHELL SPACE FOR FUTURE' WAS 500. THE BEST CASE SCENARIO WOULD BE ACCESSORY STORAGE AT 300 SF/OCCUPANT, WITH WORST CASE AT 100 SF/OCCUPANT FOR OFFICES. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS ISSUE.
3. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW (BUILDING AREA/OCCUPANT LOAD): THE ACTUAL BUILDING AREA IS LISTED AS 17,177 SF, BUT THE TOTAL SF USED FOR THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS 13,896 SF. PER THE IBC TABLE 1004.1.2, THE OCCUPANT LOAD IN BUSINESS AREAS IS BASED ON GROSS SF. PLEASE REVISE THE OCCUPANT LOAD, CONSIDERING THE GROSS SF FOR ALL BUSINESS AREAS OF THE BUILDING.
4. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW (OCCUPANT LOAD): THE DRAWING INDICATES AN ACTUAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 10 FOR THIS SUBMITTAL. PER THE IBC SECTION 1004.1.2 (EXCEPTION), AN OCCUPANT LOAD LESS THAN THE NUMBER DETERMINED BY THE CALCULATED METHOD MAY BE USED IF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVES THE LOWER NUMBER. THIS MAY BE DONE THROUGH THE APPEAL PROCESS WITH THE BUILDING OFFICIAL (FOR INFORMATION ONLY).
5. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW: THE TITLE OF THIS SHEET INDICATES AN 'EXITING ANALYSIS PLAN'. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE ACTUAL PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL, AND HOW THE OCCUPANT LOADS INDICATED AT EACH EXIT WERE DERIVED. IN ADDITION, PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL AND THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE PATH AS REQUIRED PER THE IBC SECTIONS 1014.3 AND 1016. INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE MAXIMUM DISTANCE TRAVELED FOR EACH OF THOSE, AND VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE TABLES 1014.3 AND 1016.2 ARE MET.
6. SHEET T2.0; CODE REVIEW: THE AREA INDICATED AS 'SHELL SPACE FOR FUTURE' SHOULD BE RENAMED AS STORAGE. THE TERM SHELL INFERS THE AREA IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED CURRENTLY. THE PLAN INDICATES A TOILET (SINGLE) AND ANOTHER TOILET (2 WATER CLOSETS, 2 URINALS, AND A SHOWER) THAT ARE USED IN THE CODE ANALYSIS. OCCUPANT LOADS ARE INDICATED FROM THIS SPACE FOR THE EGRESS TO THE EXITS. PLEASE REVISE THE AREA REFERENCE ON THE PLAN.
7. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: AN EXISTING STAIR IS INDICATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING. WHERE DOES THIS STAIR GO? THE CODE REVIEW INDICATES THIS IS A ONE STORY STRUCTURE. PLEASE VERIFY.
8. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 3411.6, A FACILITY THAT IS ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 11 UNLESS TECHNICALLY INFEASIBLE. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS A HIGH/LOW TYPE, OR A SINGLE POINT OF USE WATER DISPENSER. PLEASE ADDRESS HOW THIS ISSUE WILL BE EVALUATED.
9. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: NOTE 12 INDICATES A 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL. PER THE IBC SECTION 1012, SINCE THE RAISED FLOOR IS ONLY 18" ABOVE THE LOWER FLOOR, A HANDRAIL MAY BE USED IN PLACE OF A GUARDRAIL (FOR INFORMATION ONLY).
10. SHEET A6.1; HANDICAP ACCESSORIES: AT THE SIDE VIEW OF THE HANDICAP TOILET, PLEASE ADD A VERTICAL GRAB BAR PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1.
11. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: A DETAIL 10/S3.1 IS CUT ON THE PLAN AT THE EAST END OF THE NEW STEEL BEAM AND FOUNDATION. DETAIL 7/S3.1 IS ACTUALLY AT THE FOUNDATION, WHILE 10/S3.1 IS RELEVANT AT THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. PLEASE REVISE.
12. SHEET S3.2; DETAIL 2: DETAIL 1 INDICATES 'NO FIELD WELDING IS ALLOWED' AT THE NEW MECHANICAL SUPPORT FRAMES. IS FIELD WELDING ALLOWED ON DETAIL 2 (AS SHOWN)? PLEASE CLARIFY.
13. GENERAL: NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE.
14. GENERAL: THE PLAN ON SHEET T2.0 INDICATES 6 OCCUPANTS EXITING FROM THE 'SHELL SPACE' INTO HALL 139. SHEET E2.0 DOES NOT INDICATE AN EXIT SIGN LOCATED AT THAT DOOR (139A). PLEASE VERIFY.
15. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.