Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM07642
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |
| 10/18/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: T16CM07642 Blake's Tucson Store #93 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 18, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plan has been review for compliance with development package DP16-0147 and it appears to meet requirements. But until the development package has been approved the building plan cannot be approved. 3. As minor changes are proposed to the development package ensure that the site plan and all site details match what is shown in the development package. 4. Please provide a stapled set of building drawings with your next submittal. 5. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the font size used on the Gas Piping Notes (P-2) to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. If the optional hot water storage tank is to be used, provide an approved temperature and pressure relief valve for the tank. Reference: Section 504.4, IPC 2012. 3. Tucson Water expects the water pressure at this site to be in excess of 80 PSI. Provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 or CSA B356 to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2012. 4. Verify the size of the grease waste piping downstream of the floor sink serving the 3-compartment sink; it is shown as 4" on the waste and vent schematic and 2" on the plumbing plan. Any fitting or connection in a drainage system that results in a reduction of the pipe area is prohibited. Reference: Section 706.2, IPC 2012. 5. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains sized per the size of the pipe they serve (see the 3" and 4" grease waste lines south of the prep sink). Reference: Sections 708.3.1 and 708.7, IPC 2012. 6. Show the cleanout at the junction of the building drain and the building sewer on the waste and vent schematic. Reference: Section 708.3.5, IPC 2012. 7. Clarify why an indirect waste connection is being provided for the dump sink. Reference: Sections 301.3 and 802.1, IPC 2012. |
| 10/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/26/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. |
| 10/28/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G-100: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 2. SHEET G-100; BUILDING CODE INFORMATION: THE ALLOWABLE AREA IS LISTED AS 12,500 SF. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION ON THIS SHEET FOR THE ALLOWABLE AREA USING THE IBC SECTION 506. 3. SHEET G-100; BUILDING CODE INFORMATION: THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS LISTED AS 61. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION ON THIS SHEET FOR THE OCCUPANT LOAD. 4. SHEET G-100; BUILDING CODE INFORMATION: THE EGRESS WIDTH IS LISTED AS .03. PER THE IBC SECTION 1005.3.2, THIS SHOULD BE 61 X .02 = 1.22". PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET G-100; BUILDING CODE INFORMATION: THE EGRESS WIDTH INDICATES 1 EXIT REQUIRED. PER THE IBC TABLE 1015.1, AN 'A' OCCUPANCY TYPE WITH MORE THAN 49 OCCUPANTS REQUIRES TWO EXITS. PLEASE REVISE THE NOTE. 6. SHEET G-110: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 7. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOILS REPORT WAS USED FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COPY OF THE REPORT FOR REVIEW. 8. SHEET S1.2; STRUCTURAL NOTES: PLEASE REMOVE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION FOR POST TENSIONED SLAB FROM THE TABLE. 9. SHEET S1.4; DETAIL 33: PLEASE INDICATE "W" ON THE DETAIL. 10. SHEET S2.0; HOLDOWN SCHEDULE: DOES THE SIZE OF THE HOLDOWN INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE MATCH THE SIZE INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS? PLEASE VERIFY. 11. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCLULATIONS (SHEET 70): THE CALCULATIONS FOR DF1 AND DF2 DO NOT MATCH THE COLUMN FOOTING SIZES INDICATED IN THE FOOTING SCHEDULE (F2 AND F3). PLEASE COORDINATE. 12. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MECHANICAL UNIT WEIGHTS ON THE PLAN. 13. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 5. 14. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: IS THE DETAIL REFERENCE 213/S5.0 CORRECT IN NOTE 7? 15. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 9. 16. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 10. 17. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 12 (OR REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER ON SHEET S5.0). 18. SHEET S5.0; DETAIL: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL NUMBER FOR THE DETAIL AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS SHEET. 19. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PLEASE PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE SHEAR WALLS. 20. SHEETS A-100 AND A-101: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 21. GENERAL; ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 22. SHEET A-130; PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE THE TABLE/SEATING LAYOUTS IN THE DINING AREAS (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR). INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SEATING, FOLLOWING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1108.2.9.1. 23. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/08/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |