Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM07316
Parcel: 11720016H

Address:
100 S CHURCH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG

Permit Number - T16CM07316
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/19/2017 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T16CM07316
T.I. and Minor Exterior Work - New Stairwell (1st Review)
100 S. Church Avenue

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2017

DUE DATE: May 11, 2017

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the proposed Tenant Improvement plans and does not have any relevant comments related to the proposed work.


2. COMMENT: While the interior tenant improvement is not an issue for zoning review the proposed outside stairwell does appear to be an item that must be addressed. The stairwell is depicted on the HSL property and does not appear to be within an easement, reconfigured property boundary etc.

Clarify if there is a perpetual easement that will be recorded for the stairwell or is there a possibility that the lots will be reconfigured to accommodate the stairwell.

If an easement is proposed the easement will have to be drawn on the plans and recorded prior to approval by zoning. If a lot reconfiguration is a possibility the reconfiguration must be processed through PDSD and recorded.


3. COMMENT: Zoning will review the T.I Plans on the next submittal and approve and sign the plans if the plans are approved and signed by all the Commercial plans reviewers.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/24/2017 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/09/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet TS1; Code Analysis; Code Study: The general building summary indicates VB construction, while the code study indicates IIB construction. Please coordinate.
2. Sheet TS1; Code Analysis; Code Study: The allowable area calculation indicates a 0.75 increase for frontage, while the code study indicates 26/100 (0.26) increase for frontage. In addition, the code analysis indicates an allowable square footage/floor of 27,000, while the code study indicates 29,340. Please coordinate.
3. Sheet A0.2; Site Plan Keynotes: Note 11 was not located on the site plan. Please verify.
4. Sheet D1; Key Notes: Notes D3.1 and D10.1 were not located on the plans. Please verify.
5. Sheet A1; Partition Types: Please remove these from this sheet.
6. Sheet A1; Door Schedule: Please indicate this door schedule references doors on Sheet A1.1 (Floor Plan 1).
7. Sheet A1; Door Schedule: Note 1 references the incorrect SP sheet and paragraph. Please verify.
8. Sheet A1; Floor Plan 1: Keynote 6.9 used in Floor Plan 1
is not in the notes. Please verify.
9. Sheet A1; Floor Plan 1: The elevator shaft wall on Sheet A1 references Section 1/A3 (South Elevation). Please revise.
10. Sheet A1.1; Floor Plan 1: Door symbol 103 is indicated below the reception area (103), but no door is indicated. Please clarify.
11. Sheet A1.1; Plans 1 and 2: A keynote 6.9 is indicated on the plans, but not identified in the key notes. Please verify.
12. Sheet A1.1; Partition Types: Please verify all partition types are indicated on the plans.
13. Sheet A1.1; Plan 4: Plan 4/A1.1 indicates a reference to Sheet A3.1. Please revise the Sheet number.
14. Sheet A1.1; Plan 1: The wall section of the existing office (near the trash enclosure) is incorrectly identified by Keynote 8.4. Please verify.
15. Sheet A1.1; Partition Type: Partition type 6B references Detail 3/A4. Please revise the reference number.
16. Sheet A1.1; Partition Type: Partition type 6C references Details 4/A3 and 5/A3. Please revise the reference numbers.
17. Sheet A1.1; Partition Types: Partition type 4B references Detail 2/A4. There are two 2/A4 details on that sheet. Please clarify.
18. Sheet A2; Detail 6: Detail 6 references Detail 4/A3.1. Please revise the reference number.
19. Sheet A2: The north arrows on this sheet are not consistent with other plan sheets. Please verify.
20. Sheet A4: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the section notes.
21. Sheet A4; Section 2 (Wall Type 4B): The top wall track indicates "secure to roof deck see detail". Please indicate a reference for that detail location.
22. Sheet A4; Sections: There are two sections identified as 1 and two sections identified as 2. Please verify.
23. Sheet SP2; Division 14 (1.02): The description of the elevator indicates openings on the front and back. All drawings and details indicate only one opoening is provided in the shaft wall assembly at each floor. Please clarify.
24. Sheet S1.1; General Structural Notes: Please indicate on the drawings the required special inspections.
25. Sheet S1.1; ICC Evaluation Reports: Reports ESR-2322 and ESR-1771 are no longer valid. Please provide current report.
26. Sheet S1.1; ICC Evaluation Report: The report for Simpson Torq-Cut is now available. Please provide current report.
27. General: Please provide the structural calculations for review. Additional comments may be added following the review of those calculations.
28. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate.
29. General: Several references indicate the Clark/Dietrick shaft wall system at the elevator. Please provide specifications for this wall system that indicate the required two hour fire resistance rating (per Sheet TS1 shaft enclosure) is met.
30. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
05/12/2017 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Passed
05/18/2017 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/23/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed