Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM07213
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES: PLEASE ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS LIST. 2. SHEET A3; FOUNDATIONS: PLEASE REVISE THE ALLOWABLE BEARING VALUE TO READ 1500 PSF AT 18" PER THE IBC TABLE 1806.2 AND SECTION 1806.2. 3. SHEET A3; WOOD: THE WOOD CONSTRUCTION NAILING NOTE REFERENCES THE IRC. PLEASE REVISE. 4. SHEET A3; FLOOR PLAN: IN THE HALL SOUTH OF THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM, ONE STRING OF DIMENSIONS TOTALS 10'-8", WHILE THE OTHER STRING TOTALS 11'-6". PLEASE COORDINATE. 5. SHEET A3; DETAIL 3: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE BRACING ABOVE THE CEILING THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF CONNECTORS OF THE BRACES TO THE PARTITION WALL AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 6. SHEET A3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A5 (ELEVATION 3): THE PLAN INDICATES ELEVATION 3 AT THE DISPLAY CASES, WHILE SHEET A5 INDICATES ELEVATION 3 AT THE MOP SINK. PLEASE COORDINATE. 7. SHEET A3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A5 (ELEVATION 6): PLEASE LOCATE ELEVATION 6 ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 8. SHEET A3 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A6 (SECTION 1): SECTION 1 INDICATES WALL STUDS AS 2X6 AT 16" O.C., WHILE THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES 2X4. PLEASE COORDINATE. 9. SHEET A4 (FOUNDATION PLAN); DETAIL 4: THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES AN EXISTING 20" WIDE X 12" DEEP FOOTING, WHILE DETAIL 4 INDICATES AN EXISTING 1'-8" X 10" FOOTING IN THE SAME LOCATION. PLEASE COORDINATE. 10. SHEET A4; DETAIL 2: PLEASE EXTEND THE DETAIL TO THE FOUNDATION AND INDICATE HOW THE NEW 8" X 8" MASONRY PIER IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING FOOTING AND TO THE EXISTING MASONRY WALL. 11. SHEET A4; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: IN THE SOUTH ROOF AREA, A NOTE INDICATES 2-2X10 GLU-LAM. ARE THESE GLU-LAMS OR NOMINAL 2X FRAMING? PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. 12. SHEET A4; FOUNDATION AND ROOF FRAMING PLANS: PLEASE ADD NORTH ARROWS TO BOTH PLANS. 13. SHEET A4; DETAIL 1A: THERE WERE NO CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR A STEEL BEAM OPTION. PLEASE PROVIDE. 14. SHEET A4; DETAIL 1A: IF THE STEEL BEAM OPTION IS USED, WOULD THE NEW 6X8 WOOD POST BE REVISED TO A STEEL COLUMN TO SUPPORT THE STEEL BEAM? PLEASE VERIFY AND ADD TO THE DRAWINGS IF REQUIRED. 15. SHEET A4; DETAIL 2: PLEASE ADD A SECTION IF THE STEEL BEAM OPTION IS USED. 16. SHEET A4; DETAIL 3: PLEASE ADD A SECTION IF THE STEEL BEAM OPTION IS USED. 17. SHEET A5; SECTION A-A: PLEASE ADD A SECTION IF THE STEEL BEAM OPTION IS USED. 18. SHEET A6; SPECIFICATIONS: PLEASE ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS LIST. 19. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The serial number of the existing 5/8" water meter is 07013270; the proposed ¾" replacement meter will have a different serial number. Revise the water calculations on sheet P2.0 to reflect this. |
| 10/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the thermostatic mixing valve specified in the plumbing specifications for the lavatories (a discontinued product) with the thermostatic mixing valve specified in detail 203/P2.0. Reference: Section 607.1.2, IUPC 2012. 2. Clarify the sequence of operation for the hot water recirculation pump; the specification appears to be calling for the unit to operate only "after hours". Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012. 3. Coordinate the pipe and cleanout sizes shown in detail A/P1.0 with the plumbing waste plan. Reference: Section 706.2, IPC 2012. 4. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. 6. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 7. Provide sizing information for the gutters and downspouts. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and 1106.6, IPC 2012. |
| 10/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide drain piping for the proposed evaporative cooler. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2012. 2. Should detail 2/M1.0 be relabeled as the mechanical installation plan? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Show that combustible materials (e.g. the new wall with combustible construction) are not located within 18" of the Type I hood. Reference: Section 507.9, IMC 2012. 4. Show how the proposed oven and fryers are to fit beneath the existing hood and maintain all required clearance dimensions (especially if the drain trays are open on the fryers). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC and Sections 304.1, 304.9, and 507.12, IMC 2012. 5. Show how air for combustion, ventilation and dilution of flue gases is being supplied for the proposed water heater. Reference: Section 304, IFGC 2012. 6. Provide venting for the water heater per the manufacturer's instructions. Reference: Section 503.2.3, IFGC 2012. |
| 10/07/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | October 7. 2016 FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT NO.: T16OT01168 ADDRESS: 101 E Fort Lowell Tucson, Arizona 85705 PROPERTY OWNER: Chin Kuk Kim 4225 Vesper Ct, Colorada Springs The applicant is authorized to use a portion of the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE floodplain per the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 04019C1688L, specifically described as: A portion of Parcel 106-03-060B, Sawtelle Place S130' W100' EXC S10' Thereof lot 6 BLK 4 For the purpose of remodeling an existing non-conforming building. In reviewing this Floodplain Use Permit application for improvements to an existing floodprone structure, it has been concluded that the cumulative value of proposed improvements to this structure, as supported by documentation provided by the applicant, is less than 50% of the current value of the existing structure. The applicant agrees to comply with City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations, and is bound by the conditions stated below. Violation of any of the conditions stated or referred to below, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be grounds for revocation of this permit. Responsibility for renewal of this permit, if necessary, is with the applicant. Issuance of this permit does not constitute a waiver of other requirements contained in the Tucson City Code, Unified Development Code, or any other Federal, State, or local regulation. No use other than as permitted herein is allowed. Additional uses allowed under City of Tucson Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Regulations require application for, review and approval of an additional Floodplain Use Permit. This floodplain use permit is issued with the following 11 conditions: 1) All improvements proposed under this permit will be cumulative in percentage, to include this project. 2) The proposed improvements shall not impose conditions that would increase the flood damage potential to the combined proposed and existing building, by 50 percent or greater of the existing structure's value. 3) A cost estimate was used showing that the improvements are less than 50 % (estimate was 48.5%) of the Assessed Value ($91,400), as shown on the Pima County Assessors Website. No person shall repair or alter property in a piecemeal manner so as to avoid the provisions of Section 26-4.1.a.3, Chapter 26-Tucson Code. The estimate will be recorded and if piecemeal permits for this construction are applied for the cost estimate will be added to it. 4) Except as approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction, development under this permit shall not obstruct, retard or divert the existing flow of floodwaters from or to adjacent properties. 5) This Floodplain Use Permit is issued concurrently with the improvement plans/permit. Copies of these documents shall be kept in a readily accessible location on site at all times. 6) Any future permanent, freestanding walls or other structures shall have separate floodplain use permit applications submitted to this office for review and approval. 7) An application/processing fee of $50.00 (submittal fee) must accompany each future request for work to be authorized under this floodplain use permit. Engineering study review fees of $150.00 may be imposed based upon the fee schedule in the current floodplain ordinance. 8) The associated improvements are with permit activity numbers T16CM07213 and DP16-0165. 9) The applicant attests to the fact that the plans and documents submitted represent all of the improvements that will be done to the existing building, and that all additions, improvements or repairs to the building are included in the construction plans and/or documents herewith. No other improvements, repairs, reconstruction, additions or remodeling have been made to the structure that is not indicated in the attached plans and/or documents. 10) Renewal of this permit will require a new application, review and approval of that application by the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services Department, Engineering Division. This permit may be renewed for up to one year at the sole discretion of the City Engineer or designated representatives. 11) This permit is specific to the improvements for 101 E Fort Lowell Road as indicated on the approved plans. It shall not apply to any other structure or property, whether attached or unattached, not specified under this permit. This Floodplain Use Permit will be automatically revoked and becomes invalid if conditions are not complied with, as set forth in this permit. APPLICANT NAME: Stephen C. Bohn, Architect, Inc ADDRESS: 2034 E 7th Street, Tucson, AZ 85719 PHONE: 520-884-5564 OWNER: Chin Kuk Kim ADDRESS: 4225 Vesper Court, Colorado Springs, CO PHONE: TBD (EXPIRATION DATE) Month: 10 Day: 07 Year: 2017 |
| 10/14/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: Plan Sheet ED1.0. (a) Provide an electrical site plan showing the locations of the type F7 pole mounted luminaires. Include conduit, conductor sizes and types, designated circuit numbers and panel. Identification on the panel schedule. As required per the City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC art.408.4. (b) Verify or correct the "total lumens per acre used" per the Outdoor Lighting calc's. 166,079? #2. Ref: Plan sheet E1.0. Keynote #2. Where is panel K1? Typo ? #3. Ref: Plan Sheet E2.0. Locate AC units #4 and #5 on the plans. Or are units #4 and #5 actually units #1 and #2? Correct as necessary. #4. Provide for a special inspection for the exterior lighting as required per sec.106.2.1 of the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code, and indicate on the plans that a special inspection for Outdoor Lighting is required sec. 104.2.2. Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC art.408.4, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |