Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM07212
Parcel: 134251890

Address:
7070 E 21ST ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T16CM07212
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/23/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the dimensions for the proposed rain gutter, the four downspouts, and for the collection pipe leading to the cistern. Reference: Section 1106, IPC 2012.
09/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
09/26/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
10/04/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T16CM07212 - New Warehouse Building for Ace Hardware
Building plans for Banner Parking Structure (1st Review)
7070 E 21st Street - C-2 Zone

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 4, 2016

DUE DATE: October 17, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development package has not been reviewed by zoning at this time and cannot verify that the building is consistent with the development package.
2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage to ensure consistency with the DP.
3. COMMENT: If any changes that are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect the building footprint, height, or square footage need to be updated on the DP.
4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov
10/07/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T16CM07212
NEW ACE HARDWARE WAREHOUSE
1. SHEET G1.0; CODE ANALYSIS: PLEASE REVISE THE EDITION OF THE ANSI TO THE 2009.
2. SHEET G1.0; CODE ANALYSIS DATA (ALLOWABLE AREA): IT APPEARS THERE ARE EXISTING BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO THIS NEW BUILDING. USING THE IBC TABLE 602 FOR EXTERIOR WALL SEPARATIONS, DETERMINE IF THE WALLS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. INCLUDE ON THE DRAWINGS IF THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA WILL BE DETERMINED FOR SEPARATED STRUCTURES (IBC SECTION 508.4) OR NON-SEPARATED STRUCTURES (IBC SECTION 508.3). IF THE EXTERIOR WALLS ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED, PLEASE INDICATE THAT RATING (TABLE 602) AND PROVIDE A U.L. DESIGN NUMBER FOR THE WALL ASSEMBLY. INCLUDE ALL OF THE INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS.
3. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: WHAT IS THE REASON THE WALL AND COLUMN FOOTINGS ON THE SOUTH AND WEST WALLS DO NOT EXTEND PAST THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE MASONRY WALL? PLEASE EXPLAIN.
4. SHEET S1.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 2): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE AN 8' X 8' X 14" FOOTING AT GRIDS 2 AND 3 ON GRIDS A AND E, WHILE THE PLAN AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES A 2'-6" X 10'-3" X 18" FOOTING (F8). NO CALCULATION WAS LOCATED FOR THIS SIZE FOOTING. PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
5. SHEET S1.0 (FOOTING SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 6' X 6' X 14" FOOTING AT GRIDS A AND E ON GRID 1, WHILE THE PLAN AT THE WEST WALL INDICATES A 2'-6" X 8'-0" X 16" FOOTING (F3). NO CALCULATION WAS LOCATED FOR THIS SIZE FOOTING. PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
6. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 5): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 2' X 8' X 18" FOOTING AT MASONRY WALLS, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A 2'-6" X CONTINUOUS X 16" FOOTING (F7). PLEASE COORDINATE.
7. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 8): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 4.75' X 4.75' X 14" FOOTING AT GRIDS A AND E ON GRID 4, WHILE THE PLAN AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES A 4'-0" X 2'-6" X 18" FOOTING (F9). NO CALCULATION WAS LOCATED FOR THIS SIZE FOOTING. PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
8. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 11): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 5'-0" X 5'-0" X 14" FOOTING AT GRIDS D AND E ON GRID 5, WHILE THE PLAN AT THE NORTH WALL INDICATES A 4'-3" X 4'-3" X 16" FOOTING (F5), AND THE PLAN AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES A 2'-6" X 9'-6" X 18" FOOTING. NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THESE FOOTING SIZES. PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
9. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 14): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 4'-3" X 4'-3" X 14" FOOTING AT GRIDS D AND E ON GRID 6, WHILE THE PLAN AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES A 2'-6" X 9'-6" X 18" FOOTING (F10). NO CALCULATION WAS LOCATED FOR THIS SIZE FOOTING. PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE.
10. SHEET S1.0; SECTION 5: IF THE BOTTOM OF THE NEW FOOTING EXTENDS INTO THE SOIL TO A DEPTH LESS THAN THE ADJACENT EXISTING FOOTING (AS INDICATED), A CALCULATION MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING FOOTING TO ENSURE THE LATERAL PRESSURE FROM THE NEW FOOTING CAN BE RESISTED.
11. SHEET S1.0; SECTION 5: A FOOTING NOTE INDICATES 'FOUNDATION AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS'. PLEASE REMOVE THAT NOTE.
12. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 18): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE FOOTING AT THE EXTERIOR MASONRY WALLS ARE 2'-6" CONTINUOUS X 1'-6" MINIMUM DEPTH. THE PLAN INDICATES THE FOOTING AT MASONRY WALLS (ALL WALLS EXCEPT THE WEST WALL) ARE 2'-0" CONTINUOUS X 16" DEEP (F2). PLEASE COORDINATE.
13. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE DESIGN LOADS ON THE NORTH WALL COLUMNS ON GRID A MATCH THE DESIGN LOADS ON THE SOUTH WALL COLUMNS (GRID E), AND VERIFY THE FOOTING SIZE DIFFERENCE FROM THOSE NORTH WALL TO THE SOUTH WALL COLUMNS.
14. SHEET S1.0; SECTION 2: PLEASE CLEAR UP THE BOND BEAM NOTE AT THE MIDDLE OF THE MASONRY WALL.
15. SHEET S2.0; DETAILS 1 AND 8: PLEASE REMOVE THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE FOOTING DEPTH AND WIDTH, AND REPLACE WITH 'SEE FOOTING SCHEDULE FOR FOOTING SIZE AND REINFORCING'.
16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 50: A NOTE INDICATES TO REMOVE THE WIND UPLIFT. PLEASE VERIFY.
17. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MATERIAL STRENGTHS (CONCRETE, REINFORCING, MASONRY, STRUCTURAL STEEL, BOLTS, WELDS, ETC.) ON THE PLANS.
18. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE DESIGN CRITERIA (LIVE LOADS, SEISMIC LOADS, WIND LOADS, ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING, ETC.) ON THE PLANS. IF 1500 PSF IS USED FOR THE MAXIMUM SOIL BEARING VALUE (PER THE CALCULATIONS), THE FOOTING MUST EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 18" INTO THE SOIL.
19. GENERAL: INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTALS.
20. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES FOR ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/07/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Revise the electrical service one line diagram to reflect the secondary service feeders to be installed underground as required per City of Tucson Amendment sec. 112.1.1, 2012 IBC.
10/10/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
10/18/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP16-0166 must be approved first.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/26/2016 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed