Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM07031
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comment. Also provide a written response. #1.Coordinate the operation of Exhaust fan #1 shown on the electrical plan R-E1 with the note on the mechanical plan, detail #6 (note), plan sheet 'M2R. Also assign a branch circuit and panel for the fan. Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. |
| 12/29/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G1R; REVISED INDEX OF DRAWINGS: THERE IS NO SHEET A1 IN THIS SUBMITTAL SET (PER DRAWING INDEX). PLEASE VERIFY. 2. SHEET G1R; CODE REVIEW: THE FIRST ENTRY INDICATES 1323 SF, THEN THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS CALCULATED USING 1343 SF. PLEASE COORDINATE. 3. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE A SET OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS. THE ORIGINAL SHEETS HAVE CHANGED AND DO NOT MATCH THE UPDATED SHEETS ON THIS SUBMITTAL SET. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; SHEETS S1 AND S2: THERE ARE NO SHEAR WALLS INDICATED ON THE PLANS ON THIS SUBMITTAL. PLEASE VERIFY. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6; SHEET S1; CONTINUOUS FOOTING SCHEDULE: PLEASE PROVIDE A SET OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS. 6. SHEET S1.0R; PLYWOOD TABLE: PLEASE MOVE THE TABLE ON THE SHEET SO IT DOES NOT OVERLAP WITH THE NOTES. 7. SHEET S2.0R (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 3): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE DJ2 AS 2X8 AT 24" O.C. (PAGE 4), WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES 2X6 AT 24" O.C. PLEASE CLARIFY. THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 2X6 ON PAGE 7. 8. SHEET A2R; NEW FLOOR PLAN: ARE THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS OF THE NEW ADDITION ENCLOSED WITH A STUD WALL? IT IS NOT CLEAR ON THIS PLAN, AND SHEET S2.0R DOES NOT INDICATE A WALL ON SECTION 104. PLEASE CLARIFY. 9. SHEET A4R; BUILDING SECTION 6: PLEASE CUT THIS SECTION ON THE NEW FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2R. 10. GENERAL: DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE NEW SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS ARE DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT THAN THE DRAWINGS IN THE FIRST SUBMITTAL, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN THE FIRST SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED. 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/29/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed, provide a COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certification for the addition (the Mechanical Compliance Certificate has been included on sheet M2R). [Initial comment: Provide a COMcheck analysis to show that the addition complies with the 2012 IECC.] 2. The descriptions of the vertical fenestration and skylights does not indicate that NFRC-certified units are required. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide specifications for the new windows (NFRC-certified)] 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. |
| 12/29/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide information to show that the installation of the electric water heater in an exterior, unprotected location complies with the manufacturer's listing requirements. (Note that the electrical design shows the unit relocated to a different location.) Reference: Sections 303.2 and 305.3, IPC 2012. 2. Revise the water riser diagram to show the hot water return piping connecting to the cold water inlet piping for the water heater. Reference: Section 607.2.2, IPC 2012. |