Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM06690
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/07/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/14/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. What is a "ball valve with a rising stem" (P1.2, pool sump)? Reference: Section 303.4, IPC 2012. 2. Clarify the drain and fill piping associated with the pool sump (i.e. provide a riser diagram). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012. 4. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 5. The roof area located generally over rooms 117, 118, 100B, and part of 100 does not appear to have any drainage; clarify. Reference: Section 1101.2, IPC 2012. 6. The roof along the south side of the existing building shows four roof drains (keynote 1.21 on sheet a3.0) and roof drain leaders that are being re-routed but there does not appear to be any secondary roof drainage. Provide secondary roof drainage. Reference: Section 1108, IPC 2012. 7. Revise the size of the gas pipe serving the water heater; based on a demand of 199 CFH and a developed pipe length of 125 feet, a 1-1/4" pipe is required. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012. |
| 09/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components (e.g. the exterior walls and roof) used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Coordinate the window specifications shown on the energy code analysis for the building envelope with the window descriptions shown on the drawings (i.e. include the required NFRC-certified U-values and solar heat gain factors on the drawings). Reference: Section C103.2, IEC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 4. Provide the quantity of compressed medical gases in cubic feet at standard temperature and pressure to be stored in the gas room. Reference: Section 502.9.1, IMC 2012. |
| 09/19/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET g1.2; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: THE EXITS ON THE PLAN (8 TOTAL) INDICATE A TOTAL EXITING LOAD OF 127, WHILE THE ACTUAL OCCUPANCY LOAD PER THE CODE ANALYSIS IS 101. PLEASE COORDINATE. 2. SHEET g1.2; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: PLEASE ADD A WALL LEGEND TO THIS SHEET INDICATING THE VARIOUS WALL TYPES (SITE WALL, FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL, EXISTING WALL, NEW NON-RATED INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS, ETC.). 3. SHEET g1.2; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE 'PROPERTY LINES' ARE IMAGINARY (PER THE IBC SECTION 202). 4. SHEET g1.2; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: AT THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM 113, A WALL OPENING CALCULATION INDICATES TABLE 705.8 ALLOWS A MAXIMUM OF 15% OF THE TOTAL WALL AREA TO BE UNPROTECTED WALL OPENINGS. SINCE THE WALL IS 5'-2" AWAY FROM THE IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE, THE TABLE ALLOWS 25%. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. 5. SHEET g1.2 (CODE ANALYSIS PLAN); CODE ANALYSIS: IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THE ANALYSIS THAT THE 10,039 SF GROSS BUILDING AREA INCLUDES THE EXISTING ANIMAL HEALTH BUILDING. PLEASE BREAK DOWN ON THE DRAWING THE TOTAL SF OF THE NEW BUILDING AND THE EXISTING ANIMAL HEALTH BUILDING. 6. SHEET g1.2 (CODE ANALYSIS PLAN); PLUMBING FIXTURES: A NOTE INDICATES TWO SINGLE USER RESTROOMS ARE SUFFICIENT FOR THIS FACILITY (THROUGH AN APPEAL TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL). ARE THE TWO RESTROOMS IN THE EXISTING ANIMAL HEALTH BUILDING THE RESTROOMS BEING CONSIDERED? PLEASE VERIFY. 7. SHEET g1.2: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE LIST OF BUILDING CODES USED FOR THIS PROJECT. 8. SHEET s2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING, NOTE 7 IS INDICATED AT TWO LOCATIONS IN THE SLAB (SAME LOCATION AS DETAIL 119). IS THIS CORRECT AT THOSE LOCATIONS? 9. SHEET s2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 13): IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIS PLAN, THE ROOF FRAMING (B8) SPANS IN THE NORTH-SOUTH DIRECTION AND ARE SIZED AS STEEL CHANNELS. THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE ROOF FRAMING SPANS IN THE EAST-WEST DIRECTION AND ARE SIZED FOR WOOD BEAMS. PLEASE COORDINATE. 10. SHEET s2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 22): BEAM B7 IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A WOOD BEAM, WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES A STEEL CHANNEL. PLEASE COORDINATE. 11. SHEET s2.1 (REFLECTED CEILING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 22): BEAM B11 INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE. 12. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 13: WHERE ARE THE J8 JOISTS (PAGE 16) LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN? PLEASE VERIFY. 13. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 22: BEAM B12 WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. PLEASE VERIFY. 14. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM 113 IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. WALL TYPE 'A' IS REFERENCED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE ONE HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY (INDICATING ALL COMPONENTS), AND PROVIDE THE U.L. DESIGN NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 15. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM 113 HAS A DOOR 116 IN A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANT WALL. THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET a8.1 DOES NOT INDICATE THE DOOR IS REQUIRED TO BE RATED. PLEASE INDICATE A RATED DOOR PER THE IBC TABLE 716.5 ON THE DRAWINGS. 16. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM 116 IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. WALL TYPE 'B' IS REFERENCED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE ONE HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY (INDICATING ALL COMPONENTS), AND PROVIDE THE U.L. DESIGN NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 17. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE EAST WALLS OF ROOM 131 AND CORRIDOR 132, AND THE SOUTH WALLS OF ROOMS 130 AND 131, ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. WALL TYPE 'D' IS REFERENCED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE ONE HOUR RATED WALL ASSEMBLY (INDICATING ALL COMPONENTS), AND PROVIDE THE U.L. DESIGN NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 18. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR CORRIDOR 119 SHOULD BE ADDED ON THE PLAN. 19. SHEET a1.0; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE BUILDING SECTION 3/a5.1 ON THE PLAN. 20. SHEET a1.0; KEYNOTES: PLEASE COMPLETE NOTE 10.22. 21. SHEET a3.0; ROOF PLAN: A SECTION/DETAIL CUT ON THE WEST WALL CAN NOT BE READ. PLEASE REVISE. 22. SHEET a3.0; ROOF PLAN: A DETAIL CUT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NEW CANOPY IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING INDICATES 8/a9.1. SHOULD THIS REFERENCE SHEET a9.2? PLEASE VERIFY. 23. SHEET a5.1; KEYNOTES: PLEASE COMPLETE NOTE 2.2. 24. SHEET a7.0; KEYNOTES: NOTE 8.11 REFERENCES A DETAIL ON SHEET a9.0. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 25. SHEET a7.0; KEYNOTES: PLEASE COMPLETE NOTE 5.16. 26. SHEET a8.0; ROOM SCHEDULE: SHOULD THE NORTH WALL FINISH OF RESTROOM NUMBER 108 BE INDICATED AS CMU-EP? PLEASE VERIFY. 27. SHEET a8.1; GENERAL NOTES: PLEASE COMPLETE NOTE 2. 28. SHEET a9.2; DETAIL 5: PLEASE REVISE THE TITLE OF THIS DETAIL. 29. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY THE MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1006. 30. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY THE EXIT SIGNS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1011. NO EXIT SIGNS ARE INDICATED ON SHEETS a1.0 OR a2.1. 31. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY THE EXIT SIGNS ILLUMINATION MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 1011.3, 1011.5, AND 1011.6. 32. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY DIRECTIONAL EXIT SIGNAGE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1011.1. 33. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/21/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | CITY OWNED PROPERTY - NO IMPACT FEES APPLY |
| 09/22/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Reid Park Zoo Animal Health Center - 1100 S. Randolph Way Building Plan Package (1st Review) T16CM06690 (Related to DP16-0157) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2016 DUE DATE: September 30, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for the Animal Health Center building based on DP16-0157 and as it relates the zoning review purview of the building plans. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the DP, zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans Reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare it to the approved DP16-0157 to ensure that any changes that may be or are made to the building plans are still within substantial compliance with the approved DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: (Revised building plan package) |
| 09/26/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: Electrical Plan E0.0 Change NEC code references to 2011. #2. Ref: Electrical Plan E5.0 (a) Remove the main bonding jumper at the existing 600 amp service as this equipment will no longer be service equipment but re- fed from the new 800 amp service. NEC art. 250.6, 250.24. (b) Existing service notes; no code art. 230.98. Change HEC to NEC. ( Grounding ). (c) New service; Provide for a complete Grounding Electrode System including building steel, water and gas pipe bonding, include grounding conductor sizes and types. NEC art. 250.50, 250.104 (d) Provide complete load calc's and AIC ratings of the electrical service and associated equipment as required per the CITY of TUCSON COMMERCIAL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. Can be downloaded from, www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. (e) Provide for warning or caution labels on panels, equipment, associated with the emergency generator, and service equipment as required per NEC art. 700.7, 700.10. #3. Ref: Electrical Plan Sheet es1. (a)The Outdoor Lighting Calc's must include a complete inventory of the total developed area, not partial. Or justify compliance with section 102 of the Outdoor Lighting Code. (b) Where are the type 'H' exterior luminaires shown on the Outdoor Lighting table located on the plans ?. Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. |