Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T16CM06538
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/18/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/24/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/28/2017 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: November 6, 2016, Revised December 9, 2016, Revised December 21, 2016 January 13, 2017 TO: IID Design Review Committee c/o Carolyn Laurie, Principal Planner Planning & Development Services City of Tucson 201 N Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 FROM: Corky Poster, Architect/Planner (AICP) City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional RE: IID-16-03 7th Avenue Commons 58 East 5th Street Tucson, AZ 85705 OWNER: Gardner Capital Development, Reid Butler, President ARCHITECT: Biltform Architecture PHASE OF REVIEW: Review of Permit Submittal MATERIAL REVIEWED: Submittal from applicant to the City of Tucson for building permit IID STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: Check for conformance with IID approval Conditions SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS (See City of Tucson formal letter for precise conditions): 1. Stone Avenue usable retail space 2. 30 parking spaces 3. 5th Street and Stone Avenue elevations 4. Back-in spaces on east side of 7th Avenue 5. North Elevation Clubhouse refinements 6. Enhanced Building elevations 7. Refinement of outdoor areas 8. Staff and Design Professional review FINDINGS: A. North elevation of the Clubhouse on 5th Street on A5.6.1 is good. It corresponds to the color elevations drawing on the most recent booklet submittal and address the concerns of the Design Professional. It satisfies the conditions re: 5 above. B. Re: 3 above, elevations shown on A6.3.0 are not sufficient. · Metal canopies on Stone Avenue West Elevation are shown but not noted or labeled or tied to a corresponding detail drawing. · Landscape vines on North Elevation are not shown on A6.3.0, nor on the Landscape Plan L1.1, nor supported by the Irrigation Plan on I1.1. · Wire mesh on the North Elevation of A6.3.0 are shown but not noted or labeled or tied to a corresponding detail drawing. · Accentuated Building Entries re: 6 above are shown and labeled on the North Elevation of A5.6.1., the South Elevation of A5.6.1, on the East Elevation of A5.6.2, on the West Elevation of A5.6.3, but not on the North Elevation or West Elevation of A6.3.0. C. Re: 1 above, Usable space on Stone Avenue is satisfactorily resolved as shown on A1.0. Please clarify the use of the language “Deferred Submittal” on the Hubbard Engineering Sheets. Is the office space on Stone Avenue likely to change or is it to be built as shown? D. Refinements of outdoor space re: 7 above is satisfactory. E. Re: 2 and 4 above, these conditions are being reviewed by others. Submitted by: Corky Poster, Architect/Planner, Poster Frost Mirto City of Tucson Design Professional |
| 12/28/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide a revised DP to match the changes to the site. |
| 12/28/2017 | CLAYTON TREVILLYAN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | APPROVAL PENDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. MODIFICATIONS TO ELEVATIONS WILL ALTER BUILDING REVIEW |
| 12/28/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 7th Avenue Commons - Building Plan T16CM06538 Building Plan (Revision) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2017 DUE DATE: January 24, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The vehicle parking calculation shown on sheet A1.0 does not match what is shown on sheet 5 of the approved development package. A revision to the development package will be required prior to approval of the building plan. 3. The twelve (12) Civil sheets provided in the building plans will either need to be marked as "FOR REFERENCE ONLY SEE DP16-0144" of provide the approved development package sheets in the building plan. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/26/2017 | MMENDIB1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |