Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM05965
Parcel: 116191630

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T16CM05965
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/03/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Fire Department has no record of sprinklers in this building. Please verify. If there is sprinklers (as indicated in the code review section on cover sheet), please provide documentation of all required annual sprinkler inspections.
08/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The lavatory faucets specified in the plumbing fixture schedule are not automatic metering faucets. (In addition, notes #4 and #7 in the fixture connection schedule are contradictory.) Provide automatic metering faucets for the restroom lavatories that dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle (not 0.5 GPM as stated in note #1 in the plumbing fixture schedule). Verify also that the automatic metering faucets will operate for no less than a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.
2. Verify that the temperature mixing valves used to provide tempered water for the restroom lavatories conform to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
3. Note that water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022. Reference: Section 608.16.1, IPC 2012.
08/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson.
2. Provide summaries of the heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Ventilation is a major load for an A-2 occupancy; what was the basis for this in the calculations? Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
3. Provide economizers for the rooftop units along with means for relieving the excess air during economizer operation or increase the efficiency of the rooftop units per Table C403.3.1(2), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C403.3.1, IECC 2012.
4. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
5. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
08/17/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Burger King SWC St. Mary's Road & I-10
T16CM05965
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 17, 2016

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans have been reviewed and it appears that the building plan match development package DP16-0129. But until DP16-0129 has been approved the building plan cannot be approve.

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
08/17/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET COVER; PROJECT DATA: THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE OUTDOOR PATIO DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ADDED TO THE OCCUPANT LOAD SHOWN. PLEASE COMBINE AND USE THAT TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OUTDOOR AREA SEPARATE FROM THE INDOOR OCCUPANCY. REFERENCE THE IBC SECTION 1004.5.
2. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INCLUDE THE OUTDOOR PATIO WITH THIS PLAN, AND INDICATE MEANS OF EGRESS AND ACCESSIBLE SEATING LOCATIONS FOR THAT PATIO.
3. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: TWO DETAILS AT THE NORTH END STORAGE AND WALK-IN AREAS REFERENCE SECTION B/A7.3. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE.
4. SHEET A6.1; ELEVATIONS: THE NORTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN ORIENTATION. PLEASE REVISE.
5. SHEET A6.2; ELEVATIONS: THE EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN ORIENTATION. PLEASE REVISE.
6. SHEET A7.1: A NOTE ON THIS SHEET INDICATES THE TOWN OF PINETOP SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS. PLEASE REVISE.
7. SHEET A8; KEYNOTES: NOTE 15 INDICATES NEW ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT TO REPLACE EXISTING. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE WEIGHTS OF THE NEW MECHANICAL UNITS ARE THE SAME (OR LESS) THAN THE EXISTING UNITS, AND VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF THE NEW UNITS MATCH EXISTING UNIT LOCATIONS. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS REQUIRED.
8. SHEET A8; ROOF PLAN: PLEASE REFERENCE COMMENT 3 FOR THE SECTION REFERENCE REVISION.
9. SHEET S1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE STRUCTURAL GENERAL NOTES.
10. SHEET S4; DETAIL 3: THE WALL SHEATHING, SILL PLATE CONNECTION, AND SHEAR WALL EDGE NAILING ALL REFERENCE THE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE. NO LATERAL CALCULATIONS WERE SUBMITTED, AND NO SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE WAS LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE.
11. SHEET S4; DETAIL 4: A NOTE INDICATES TO "SEE PLAN FOR FOOTING SIZE AND REINFORCING". THIS INFORMATION WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY.
12. SHEET S5: PLEASE GET S5 INDICATED IN THE TITLE BLOCK.
13. SHEET S5; DETAIL 9: PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE ADDITIONAL ANGLE IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING JOIST.
14. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
08/23/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide for GFI protected w/p 120 volt receptacles on the roof for mechanical equipment maintenance. NEC 210.63
#2. Provide complete compliance with the City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. Be sure to include the rooftop LED lighting.
#3. Provide revised load calc's for the building.
Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC.
08/25/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change A Floodplain Use Permit is required for this project. The FUP must be approved before the building plans can be approved. This project is a substantial improvement. The project valuation is $190,000 and the county assessor gives the full cash value of the structure as $179,131. One of the following must be provided for:
1. Revise the project so it is not a substantial improvement by
a. Revising the project so the valuation is less than 50 per cent of the value of the structure.
b. Provide an appraisal of the building showing the value of the building is greater than twice the cost of the improvements. The appraisal must take into account the depreciation and wear and tear on the building.
c. Provide an appraisal showing the building has a higher value than the county assessor full cash value combined with a revised project valuation that is less than half the value of the building.
2. Revise the project so the lowest floor of the building is at the regulatory flood elevation (RFE). The RFE is 2338.25 NAVD 88 which is one foot above the base flood elevation of 2337.25.
3. Revise the project to provide for flood proofing of the structure to the RFE.
If the reference plan is correct, the floor elevation for the existing structure is 2337.75 NAVD 88.