Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM05829
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Corbett Brewery - 414 N 5th Avenue (Zoning C-3) Building Plans (3rd Review) T16CM05829 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2016 DUE DATE: November 22, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. FOLLOW UP TO PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: I acknowledge the responses to the previous zoning comments. However, the previous comments are still applicable until such time as the DP and the IID is approved. Once the IID and the DP is approved zoning will review the building plans and assure that the building plans are consistent with the approved DP and IID and if applicable any conditions of approval of the IID. Previous Comment 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the UDC. Address the following comments and res-submit the building plans for review. a. On the application for this project the description was labeled as a Tenant Improvement for a Restaurant. It is clear that the plans submitted for review do not include a restaurant. There are annotations for future tenant spaces that are proposed as restaurants but they are not part of this permit. Any information related to this project shall be revised to reference an Alcoholic Beverage Service Use. (Bar) with Microbrewery as an accessory use. b. It is acknowledged that a Development Package was submitted to PDSD for review of the proposed site and uses. It is further acknowledged that the site will not meet the minimum parking requirements based on the location and size of the lot. This area is within the Downtown Links Sub-district - Warehouse Triangle Area and is eligible for the IID review and approval process. Indicate by response if the applicant has submitted for an application for an IID review. c. While a DP was submitted for review prior to submittal of the building plans, the DP package was not available to verify the proposed uses listed on the DP and comparing them to the uses proposed on this building plan. Also there appears to be an expansion of an outside patio depicted on the building plans which could not be verified without the DP. Ensure that any proposed expansions are also drawn and labeled as such on the DP site plan drawing if they were not depicted. d. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and do a comparison of the building plans with the approved DP if available and conditions of the IID approval if applicable. Be aware that additional zoning comments could be forthcoming on the next building plan review. |
| 11/15/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. All of the hot water piping (i.e. hot water supply and return piping) is required to be insulated, not just the hot water return piping. Verify that the proposed foam insulation has a has a thermal conductivity not exceeding 0.27 BTU per inch/h x square foot x degree Fahrenheit and is listed for direct burial. Reference: Section C404.5, IECC 2012 and Section 303.2, IPC 2012. [Second comment: The Plumbing Specifications on sheet p0.1 state that no joints for water piping are to be located underground; where do the two branches of the hot water return join? Specify how the hot water return pipes are to be insulated below ground.] [Initial comment: Show the return piping for the recirculated hot water for the water heater on the plans and detail. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Waste stack #3 appears to show a hand sink with an indirect waste; hand sinks shall be directly connected. Reference: Section 301.3, IPC 2012. [Second comment: Waste stack #3 shows vents that appear to run horizontally prior to rising 6" above the flood rim of the fixture they serve: see Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] [Initial comment: Clarify how waste stack #3 connects to waste stack #2 on the plumbing waste plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 3. Verify and note the first floor elevations for each floor level within the activity area. A floor elevation of 2402.50' does not require a backwater valve when the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole is 23.64 feet below the floor level. Similarly, the mechanical mezzanine which is noted as being 107.55 feet higher than the first floor elevation does not need a backwater valve either. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. [Second comment: Provide the rim elevation of the sewer structure 9847-03 and the first floor elevation to justify the installation of backwater valves in the building sewer. Note that plumbing fixtures that are located on a floor that is greater than 12" above the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole (e.g. the mezzanine) may not drain through a backwater valve.] [Initial comment: The plumbing waste plan (p1.0) shows a connection to the public sewer in 5th Avenue. Verify that a public sewer exists at that location.] 4. An air admittance valve is not approved for use as a vent for a combination waste and vent system. Reference: Section 918.3, IPC 2012. [Second comment: The dry vent for the combination waste and vent system appears to run horizontally prior to rising 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures it serves: see Section 905.4, IPC 2012] [Initial comment: The waste system serving the bar appears to be a combination waste and vent system. Provide a dry vent for the system. Reference: Section 918.3, IPC 2012.] 5. Coordinate the plumbing waste plan with the revised waste isometric for stack #1; the plumbing plan still shows two dry vents running horizontally below the floor in the brewery area. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. |
| 11/21/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |