Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM05759
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/27/2016 | RBENT2 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | PER ENEWCOMB |
| 07/27/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Needs Review | A development plan will probably be required for changes to site. Verify. Unable to locate keynotes for site plan. Please indicate proposed location and size of fire service line. Sheet B1.2 indicates room 117 as hazard. Please clarify what hazard will contained within this room. Sheet S1.0 has section cuts refering to sheets S1.1 and A4.1. Unable to locate these sheets. |
| 08/01/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide roof area and the sizing information for the gutter and downspouts for the addition. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and 1106.6, IPC 2012. |
| 08/01/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) for the storefront window system specified on sheet A1.0 to be the MAXIMUM values for the U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C402.3.3, IECC 2012. 2. Delete the "Storefront Window Energy Spec's" on sheet B1.0: no storefront windows are shown on the addition. Provide a COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate for the building addition. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, IECC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 4. Coordinate the architectural room numbers with the room numbers shown on the mechanical floor plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Exhaust fan EF-6 serves a room labeled "Hazard"; what is being stored or used in this room? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 08/01/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/15/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: MHC Healthcare Building Expansion. T16CM05759 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It appears that the proposed building plans matches what is shown on development package DP16-0125 but until the development package is approved the building plans cannot be approve. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/15/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/22/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Requires approval of Development package DP16-0125 first. |
| 08/22/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET TS1; CODE REVIEW (PLUMBING FIXTURES): THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 REQUIRES TWO MEN'S AND TWO WOMEN'S TOILETS. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING. 2. SHEET TS1; CODE REVIEW (ALLOWABLE AREA): SINCE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS INSTALLED IN THIS PROJECT, THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA (PER IBC SECTION 506.3) IS 9000 + 3x9000 = 36,000 SF, AND THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT (PER IBC SECTION 504.2) IS 60 FEET, OR 3 STORIES. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING. 3. SHEET TS1; APPLICABLE CODE: PLEASE REVISE THE OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE ON THE DRAWING. 4. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: FOUR DIFFERENT SECTION CUTS REFERENCE SHEET A4.1. PLEASE REVISE. 5. SHEET B1.0; KEYNOTES: NOTE 6 INDICATES A REFERENCE FOR A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. PLEASE CLARIFY THE REFERENCE. 6. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATIONS: THREE DIFFERENT SECTION CUTS REFERENCE SHEET A4.1. PLEASE REVISE. 7. SHEETS A2.0 AND A2.1; ELEVATION KEYNOTES: PLEASE ADD A GENERAL NOTE THAT NOT ALL KEYNOTES ARE INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING. 8. SHEETS A2.0 AND A2.1; ELEVATIONS: FOUR DIFFERENT SECTION CUTS REFERENCE SHEET A4.1. PLEASE REVISE. 9. SHEET A3.0; ROOF PLAN: FOUR DIFFERENT SECTION CUTS REFERENCE SHEET A4.1. PLEASE REVISE. 10. SHEET A3.0; KEYNOTES: NOTE 7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 11. SHEET A4.0; SECTION 3: AT THE FOUNDATION, A REFERENCE 1/A1.0 IS REFERENCED. PLEASE REVISE. 12. SHEET B6.0; RESTROOM ELEVATIONS B AND F: PLEASE INDICATE THE 42" GRAB BAR IS LOCATED A MAXIMUM OF 12" FROM THE WALL. 13. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE SECTIONS CUT ALL REFERENCE SHEETS A4.1 OR S1.1. PLEASE REVISE. 14. SHEET S2.0 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 7): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B-1 IS A 6X12, WHILE THE DRAWINGS INDICATE A 6X10. PLEASE COORDINATE. 15. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING PLAN: THE SECTION CUTS ALL REFERENCE SHEETS A4.1 OR S2.1. PLEASE REVISE. 16. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE THE SHEAR WALL TYPE (SW1 OR SW2) FOR THE NORTH WALL OF THE SOUTH ADDITION. 17. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); BRACING DETAIL 6: THE 4X4X1/4 ANGLE BRACE INDICATES 3 MINIMUM (AS DOES KEYNOTE 4), WHILE THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES FOUR ON THE NEW NORTH WALL, AND ONE ON THE EAST AND WEST RETURN WALLS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND INDICATE BRACE SPACING ON THE DRAWING. 18. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 6: THE VERBIAGE ON NOTE 4 DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON CONNECTION DETAILS 7 AND 8. PLEASE CLARIFY. 19. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 6: THE DETAILS REFERENCE 11/S2.1 AND 12/S2.1. PLEASE REVISE. 20. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 6: THE VERBIAGE ON NOTE 5 DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON DETAILS 7 AND 8. PLEASE CLARIFY. 21. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 5: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE (NOT A LINTEL). 22. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 4: ON THE OPTIONAL LINTEL, PLEASE PROVIDE THE EXPANSION ANCHOR MINIMUM EMBEDMENT INTO THE BLOCK. 23. SHEET S3.0; ROUGH CARPENTRY: NOTE b3 INDICATES PLYWOOD THICKNESS AS NOTED ON DRAWINGS. NO NOTES ON THE DRAWINGS INDICATED THE ROOF PLYWOOD THICKNESS OR NAILING PATTERN (PER CALCULATIONS ON SHEET 15). PLEASE ADD TO THE DRAWINGS. 24. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THERE WERE NO CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW JOIST EXTENSIONS (2X10 AT 24" O.C.) TO THE EXISTING JOISTS. PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE CONNECTION DESIGN. 25. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |