Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM05642
Parcel: 137070300

Address:
5125 S 12TH AV

Review Status: Active

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T16CM05642
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/28/2017 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Passed
09/21/2017 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
12/08/2016 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change The exits into the Display Storage is not allowed. I cannot find a code section that allows what is proposed, please clarify.

The occupant load proposed indicates that three required exits are needed. The layout only indicates two out of the main assembly area that can be used by spectators. The exit behind the stage is not an acceptable exit for the spectators.
12/14/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Principle Planner

PROJECT: 5125 S. 12th Avenue - Change of Use Retail to Alcoholic Beverage Service
T16CM05642
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2016

The previous comments are still applicable. Until a DP application has been approved for the parcel at 5135 S 12th Avenue the TI application cannot be approved.

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. As this is a change of use, Retail to Alcoholic Beverage Service, and there does not appear to be an approved site plan for the vehicle parking located on parcel 137-07-0290, 5135 S. 12th Avenue, a development package that meets the requirements of AM 2-06 is required. Until the development package is submitted and approved the building plans cannot be approved.

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
12/14/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Since the zoning reviewer has determined that a development plan is required, an updated drainage report will be required to show how the site meets 5-year threshold retention requirements. The 1st submittal of the drainage report makes the comparison to existing impermeable conditions to propose no threshold retention requirement. This needs to be updated to provide a comparison between undeveloped conditions and developed conditions. Please see UDC 7.14.4, Section 12.2.1, Item 7, where a significant increases in stormwater volumes discharged to the right-of-way are compared to predeveloped, pregraded conditions.
12/19/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the listing information for the concrete double lavatory, P-1A. Clarify the type of urinal that is to be installed. On sheet P6, P-3 is specified as a flush valve urinal with P-3A specified as a waterless urinal; on sheet P2, urinal P-3 appears to be installed as a waterless urinal and P-3 is listed as a waterless urinal for the fixture unit calculations. [Initial comment: Clarify the fixture descriptions for all of the plumbing fixtures; the fixture unit calculations have different fixture descriptions than the plumbing schedule (e.g. waterless urinal or flush valve?). Provide third-party listing and material standards for all plumbing fixtures being proposed. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2012.]
2. Verify that the indirect drains for each of the compartments of the 3-compartment sink will be run independently to the floor sink. Provide a cleanout for the horizontal branch drain from the bar area (I assume that the 4" callout for the horizontal drain was intended to be 2"). [Initial comment: Clarify the fixtures being proposed for the bar area. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
3. The specifications for the faucets on the P-1 lavatories call for a 1.5 GPM flow rate and a 10-second operating cycle. The minimum operating cycle for accessibility is 10-seconds: what tolerances are you allowing to ensure that you can meet both the minimum time and maximum water delivery requirements? [Initial comment: Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucet will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.]
4. The new plumbing fixture calculation on sheet A0.0 is incorrect. The number of occupants of each sex shall be equal for this calculation (i.e. 259 men and 259 women, not 258 men and 259 women). The number of required fixtures shown in Table 2902.1, IBC 2012 is based upon the minimum fixtures required for each person or fraction of the number of persons. Since fractional fixtures cannot be installed, fractional numbers for fixtures shall also be rounded up to the next whole number. Reference: footnote (a), Table 2902.1, IBC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide a calculation of the required number of fixtures for the assembly occupancy based on Table 2902, IBC 2012.]
5. Clarify the source of the water fixture units used to calculate the water demand; it doesn't appear to be from either the IPC or the UPC. It appears that the system should be predominantly a flush valve system which will call into question the size of the water service and distribution piping. [Initial comment: Revise the fixture units used to calculate the total water demand using the values shown in Table E103.3 (2), IPC for public fixtures. Include all of the fixtures in the calculations. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2012.]
12/19/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
2. Show that the proposed replacement rooftop units meet the requirements of Sections C403.2.2, C403.2.3, C403.2, and C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. If the roof sheathing is removed as part of the installation of the new trusses, show how the roof cavity is to be insulated. Reference: Section C101.4.3 (5), IECC 2012.
4. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
5. Show how excess air is to be relieved from the building when the relocated rooftop unit is in economizer mode. Reference: Section C403.3.1.1.4, IECC 2012.
12/19/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET T1.0; CODE REVIEW: PLEASE REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THE 2009 EDITION.
2. SHEET T1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE ALLOWABLE AREA IS INDICATED AS 12,000 SF (CALCULATIONS INDICATES 6000 SF AND 200% INCREASE FOR SPRINKLERS). PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE IBC SECTION 506.3 ALLOWS A 300% INCREASE FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (PER THE IBC SECTION 903.3.1.1) = 6000 + 3 X 6000 = 24,000 SF.
3. SHEET T1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS INDICATED AS 40' OR ONE STORY. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE IBC SECTION 504.2 ALLOWS A 20' HEIGHT INCREASE AND ONE STORY INCREASE FOR A SPRINKLER SYSTEM (PER SECTION 903.3.1.1) = 60 FEET OR TWO STORIES.
4. SHEET T1.0; FIRE SPRINKLER NOTES: IN THE FIRST NOTE, IT STATES A NFPA 13 AND 25 SPRINKLER SYSTEM. WHAT DOES THE SYSTEM 25 REPRESENT (SEE SECTION 903.3.1.1)?
5. SHEET A0.0; EXIT FLOOR PLAN: THE RETAIL DISPLAY/STORAGE ON THE SOUTH INDICATES 2705 SF AND AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 9 (300 SF/OCCUPANT). IS THIS A STORAGE SPACE OR A RETAIL SPACE? SHOULD THIS BE 30 SF/OCCUPANT INSTEAD OF 300SF/OCCUPANT? PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE THE OCCUPANT LOAD AS REQUIRED.
6. SHEET A0.0; EXIT FLOOR PLAN: IS THE RETAIL DISPLAY/STORAGE AREA ON THE EAST END PART OF THIS TENANT SPACE? IT APPEARS YOU CAN EXIT THROUGH THAT SPACE FROM THE EVENT AREA. NO OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS AREA IS INDICATED. PLEASE CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A0.0; OCCUPANT LOAD: PLEASE REVISIT THE OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE TENANT SPACE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD WILL AFFECT THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS.
8. SHEET A0.0; PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS: IF THE 517 OCCUPANT LOAD IS CORRECT, THE WATER CLOSET CALCULATION SHOULD BE REVISED TO 7 FOR MALES AND FEMALES (258/40 = 6.5 OR 7 AND 259/40 = 6.5 OR 7). THE LAVATORY CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE REVISED TO 4 FOR MALES AND FEMALES (258/75 = 3.5 OR 4 AND 259/75 = 3.5 OR 4).
9. SHEET A0.0; PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS: PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.2.1, THIS SPACE WILL REQUIRE A FAMILY RESTROOM. PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE DRAWINGS (IN THE PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS AND ON THE FLOOR PLAN).
10. SHEET A0.0; EXTERIOR/INTERIOR HARDWARE SCHEDULE: DOOR 12 IS NOT LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN IF THIS IS AN EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN.
11. SHEET A0.0; EXTERIOR/INTERIOR HARDWARE SCHEDULE: DOOR 15 IS LISTED UNDER HARDWARE SET 1 AND 5. PLEASE CLARIFY.
12. SHEET A0.0; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1016.3, THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED ALONG HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL PATHS. IN THE EVENT AREA SPACE, A DIAGONAL PATH INDICATES 17'. REVISE TO VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL PATHS. THE 17' DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT.
13. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS HOW THE 6 ACCESSIBILITY FEATURES LISTED IN THE IEBC SECTION 410.4.2 ARE MET.
14. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9; HANDRAILS AT STAIRS: ARE HANDRAILS REQUIRED AT THE STEPS AT THE STAGE? PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROVIDE DETAILS AS REQUIRED.
15. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10; EVENT BAR ACCESSIBILITY: PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 904.3, A PORTION OF THE COUNTER SERVICE SHALL BE 36" MINIMUM IN LENGTH AND 36" MAXIMUM IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FLOOR. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE EVENT BAR PLAN (SHEET A2.1) THIS REQUIREMENT IS MET.
16. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/19/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Clarify the size of the proposed new water meter and backflow preventer. On Keynote #18 (A1.0) the meter is 1" and the backflow preventer is 1-1/4" but on sheet P4, both the meter and the backflow preventer are shown as 1-1/2" in size. [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
12/28/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/05/2016 ANY REJECT SHELF RECEIVED