Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM05403
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/14/2016 | FRODRIG2 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 07/14/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide a site plan, showing utilities, etc. Inconsistent addresses on cover sheet. |
| 07/22/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July 22, 2016 DUE DATE: August 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Proposed TI Medical Office TO: Metro TED LOCATION: 1635 N Swan Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: T16CM05403 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Building Plans. A Development Plan Package is required prior to approval of the building package. There is concern generated by the supplemental geotechnical recommendations provided for an adjacent parcel. The location of the underground retention for the master site and the utility service line for this building should be routed in a way that complies with recommended of a geotechnical report. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please list the relative case numbers, such as the development plan package number for the overall site and this specific site in the title block area on each sheet. 2) Per AM 2-06.4.8F please show the location of the underground retention basin on the site plan that the adjacent parcels Geotechnical report mentions is planned for the main parking lot. 3) Per TSM 2-01.4.1D a soils report has been prepared for the adjacent parcel with recommendations, including a recommendation that utilities not be routed from the same side of the building as the underground retention basin. There is concern that the backfill usually used in utility trenches, such as chat or bedding sand may act as a conduit to convey subsurface drainage from the underground retention basin to the structural foundation of the proposed buildings. After the location of the retention basin is shown in comparison to the proposed utility routing for building services, a determination should be made as to whether a specialized set of backfill requirements is needed for utility backfill. Please note that per page 2 of the 2006 original soils report that "this site lies within an area of Tucson that has a well-documented history of foundation settlement. Field and laboratory tests confirm the presence of highly compressible soils in the upper five to ten feet." Please note that per page 14 of the Soils report it may be appropriate to compact utility trenches to 95% density. Please add a general note outlining any appropriate requirements. 4) Per TSM 7-01.4.3E roof drainage must be conveyed beneath the sidewalk for the 10-year storm. 5) Per TSM 2-01.4.1D a soils report specific to this site should be prepared with recommendations. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a reference copy of the approved drawings for the building shell prior to review of the tenant improvement. |
| 07/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a reference copy of the approved drawings for the building shell prior to review of the tenant improvement. |
| 07/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a reference copy of the approved drawings for the building shell prior to review of the tenant improvement. |
| 07/27/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T16CM05403 Medial Out Patient Use - Dialysis Center (1st Review) 1635 N. Swan Road TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 27, 2016 DUE DATE: August 10, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the plans for the T.I. but cannot approve the plans until the following items have been addressed. 2. COMMENT: This site was platted as a commercial development for Admin Office and Medical Outpatient uses. The Tentative plat /Development plan case number is S07-122. The TP / DP plan provides the development requirements as well as landscape requirements. A full size copy of the TP / DP must be included with the T.I. or Shell building package for zoning review and comparison to the proposed development for the address 1635 N Swan Road. 3. COMMENT: The T.I. Floor plan appears to be larger than Lot 3. It is not clear if this proposal will require a lot combo, lot reconfiguration or possibly a re-plat. Until the proposed building footprint is laid out on lot 3 for review, zoning cannot review for compliance with the approved TP / DP requirements. 4. COMMENT: For your convenience I have attached a copy of the tentative plat document for your review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/08/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/11/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A-100; CODE DATA: PLEASE ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THE GOVERNING CODES LIST. 2. SHEET A-100 (SYMBOL LEGEND); SHEET A-101 (FLOOR PLAN): THE SYMBOL LEGEND INDICATES A ONE HOUR SMOKE WALL (SMOKE BARRIER PER THE IBC SECTION 709?), AND INDICATES THE EXTENT OF THOSE WALLS ON SHEET A-101. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE USE OF THE SMOKE BARRIERS IN AN OFFICE OCCUPANCY, AND LIST THE CODE SECTION USED IN THE DETERMINATION OF THAT REQUIREMENT. PLEASE INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. 3. SHEET A-101; FLOOR PLAN: THERE ARE FOUR ELEVATION INDICATORS (ONE EACH SIDE OF PLAN) THAT HAVE NO INFORMATION LISTED. PLEASE FINISH. 4. SHEET A-101; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE QUANTITY OF EACH SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IN THIS SPACE (IF ANY). VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 414.2.5(1) ARE MET FOR THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES OF THE DIFFERENT MATERIALS. 5. SHEET A-101; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE CALL OUT THE SERVICE SINK AND DRINKING FOUNTAIN (HIGH/LOW OR SINGLE POINT OF USE) ON THE PLAN. 6. SHEET A-401; ELEVATIONS 2, 3, 6, 7, AND 9: PLEASE INDICATE THE DIMENSIONS FROM THE FLOOR TO THE TOP OF THE HORIZONTAL GRAB BARS, AND THE DIMENSION FROM THE FLOOR TO THE BOTTOM OF THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR, PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURES 604.5.1 AND 604.5.2. 7. SHEET A-401: PLEASE ADD ELEVATIONS FOR THE TRANSFER-TYPE SHOWER PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 608.4.1, INCLUDING GRAB BARS, SEAT, CONTROL, AND HAND SHOWER REQUIREMENTS AND LOCATIONS. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY THE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DESIGNS ACCOUNT FOR THE FIRE/SMOKE REQUIREMENTS AT ALL RATED AREAS AND ROOMS, AND ALL OPENING PROTECTIVES PER SECTION 716. 9. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |