Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Permit Number - T16CM05327
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2016 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T16CM05327 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide two sets of updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code and 2012 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. Show a plumbing code recognized by the City of Tucson, 2012 IRC. Update note #1. 2. All construction drawings submitted after June 1, 2010 for one- or two-family dwellings must provide gray water utilization or preparation, Ordinance #10579/11089 revised July 9, 2013. See details at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/codes-ordinances/Grey_Water_Options_FINAL_.pdf Update detail #3 with the second clothes washer standpipe method for collecting from a lower level fixture. 3. Show the water heater with a listed pan and ¾" drain line to a waste receptor or to the building exterior 6" above grade, P2801.5. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. Show dryer vent size and location for venting to exterior, M1501. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Show a plumbing code recognized by the City of Tucson, 2012 IRC. Update general note #2/E2. 2. Show all garage receptacle outlets with GFCI protection, E3902.2. Include the ceiling receptacle on circuit #24. 3. Protect all interior 15A & 20A proposed outlets (except garage, kitchen, and bathrooms) including receptacles, lights and smoke detectors with combination type arc-fault circuit interrupters, E3902.12. Update note #5/E1 with "bedroom" limitation. 4. Show or notate a disconnect means or a locking breaker for the water heater, E4101.5. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
| 08/03/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July18, 2016 DUE DATE: July 29, 2016 SUBJECT: New Construction TO: Roshelle Stahl LOCATION: 2205 N Woods Place REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: T16CM05327 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per TSM 2-01.4.1 and AM 2-06.4.9M1 a grading plan and permit is required. Please submit a permit application under the development package submittal form and comply with applicable criteria under AM 2-06. 2) Per TSM 2-01.8.4 all fills shall be compacted to 90%. Please add a general note to plan indicating this as a requirement. 3) Per TSM 2-01.8.5 all fill slopes shall be no greater than 1 unit vertical to 2 units horizontal (ie. 50% slope). Please add a general note to plan indicating this as a requirement. 4) Per TSM 2-01.9.3 the toe of all fill slopes shall be at least 2 feet from the property boundary or ½ the height of the fill, whichever is greater. Please show this by providing grading limits in the grading plans to be submitted as part of the development package submittal. 5) Per TSM 2-01.10.4 there shall be a 2% slope away from the building pad towards an approved drainage facility. Please provide callouts on the plan. 6) Per AM 2-06.4.7B1 list the following note on the plans; "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." - Hand written note should be modified to comply with AM 2-07.4.5. 7) Per AM 2-06.4.7B3 list the following note on the plans; "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." - Hand written note should be modified to comply with AM 2-07.4.5. 8) Per AM 2-06.4.8E2 existing and proposed contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than 2 feet. 9) Per AM 2-06.4.8H please show direction and gradients of ground slope on adjacent land. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.9N7 please show where surface drainage will enter and leave the property. This includes proposed contours and spot grades for how drainage from the adjacent subdivision will continue to be routed to the existing retention basin. 11) This permit can not be approved until the floodplain use permit and Development package that has not yet been applied for is approved first. 12) There is a typo on the site plan where Gravel Driveway is misspelled. Please correct. 13) Include the finished floor elevation on this plan once the plan submitted with the floodplain use permit has been approved. 14) Provide cut and fill quantities and areas of disturbance. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 08/03/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields, Principal Planner PDSD Zoning review Section PROJECT: New SFR - 2205 N. Woods Place R-1 RCP Development Package (1st Review) T16CM005327 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2016 DUE DATE: July 28, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the proposed SFR development for compliance with the zoning regulations. While setbacks, height and coverage are compliance with the required dimensional standards, zoning cannot approve the permit application at this time. 2. The applicant must provide with the next submittal copies of the recorded lot split documents that include a meets and bounds survey depicting the new lots created with distance and bearings labeled, copies of the recorded legal descriptions, and any amended CC&R's that includes the new lots. 3. The following items must be addressed either by response comment or if required drawn and labeled on the site plan. For your convenience I have attached a copy of the final plat for your records and information. a. Per the approved subdivision plat BK 49 PG54 (attached) there is an easement that was recorded by the plat that has not been drawn on the site plan sheet. It is not clear if the location of the house will be over the sewer easement until the easement is drawn, dimensioned and labeled. b. The site plan does not depict how access is provided to the remaining portion of Bock "A". c. Clarify if the existing recorded turn-around easement will remain or will the easement be extinguished? d. The existing drainage easement must also be drawn and labeled as recorded by the plat. 4. Zoning could not verify that a lot split application was reviewed and approved for the subdivision of Block A. As part of the review of the lot split items noted in comment 3 would have been addressed by the Zoning and Engineering reviewers prior to approval of the lot split. The owner or applicant will have to provide the documentation that was used to record the lot split and process a Lot Split application (fee involved). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Site Plan and requested documents related to the lot split. |
| 08/08/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | A fire hydrant needs to be with 600 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the proposed structure. Please indicate compliance or indicate a fire hydrant will be added. An approved fire department turnaround is necessary based on the length of the driveway. Please indicate on the site plan the paved area to be used as the turnaround. |