Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T16CM04943
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/28/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 25; SHEETS A2.1 AND A2.2; NEW SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL: IT DOES APPEAR THE NEW BUILDING SOUTH WALL IS GREATER THAN 10 FEET FROM EITHER OF THE VISITATION HOUSES (SEE SHEET A1.0). HOWEVER, AT THE SECOND FLOOR THE WINDOW WALL DOES GET CLOSER THAN 10 FEET TO THOSE HOUSES (AS NOTED ON DRAWING SHEET A0.2, CHAPTER 7, LAST PARAGRAPH). LOOKING AT SECTION 3/A4.2, THERE IS ALSO WALL ABOVE AND BELOW THE WINDOWS THAT SHOULD INDICATE A ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. THAT WAS NOT FOUND ON THE DRAWINGS. PLEASE VERIFY, AND INDICATE (ON SECOND FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A0.2?) THAT THERE IS A ONE HOUR WALL AT THE SECOND FLOOR. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 31; SHEET A2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A0.2 (CODE PLAN): THE CODE PLAN INDICATES THE ASSEMBLY AREA NORTH OF THE MAIN LOBBY IS SEPARATED FROM THE OFFICE AREA. IS THE GLASS WALL (NOTED AS AL26 ON SHEET A2.1) AND THE DOOR IN THAT GLASS WALL (SEE AL26 ON SHEET A9.3) TO BE RATED FOR THE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING? AL26 ON SHEET A9.3 DOES NOT INDICATE A RATED ASSEMBLY. PLEASE VERIFY. 3. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/28/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/03/2016 | KROBLES1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/03/2016 | KROBLES1 | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |