Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM04943
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/18/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The garage level drainage plan (P0.0) shows a horizontal drain exiting the building near column B.5-1 and then proceeding to the west. Where is this shown on the civil drawings? Also, a sand-oil separator is specified on sheet P2.0; where is this shown? 2. Family restrooms may contain only one water closet and only one lavatory. Reference: Section 1109.2.1.2, IBC 2012. 3. The specifications for P-1 and P-1A refer to a temperature mixing valve (Watts L111) that is obsolete and also provide an incorrect listing for the application. See detail 205 for a valve that is currently produced and listed to the correct standard. 4. Clarify the specifications for the water closets P-2 and P-2H. Both are shown with seats that are 19" above the finished floor (I'll assume that the 116-1/2" rim height noted for P-2H is a typo) but P-2 is wall-mounted and P-2H is floor-mounted; clarify the waste and vent drawings to show how the water closets are to be installed. 5. Revise the titles for C/P2.0 and D/P2.0. 6. Revise the water pipe sizing based on the available water pressure or provide a booster pump system. Reference: Section 604.7, IPC 2012. 7. Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of vertical stacks. Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012. 8. Provide a design for the subsoil drainage system. Reference: Section 1112.1, IPC 2012. 9. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. |
| 07/18/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Verify the available water pressure for the activity The Tucson Water data indicates a pressure range of 41.48 to 48.48 PSI for this address. |
| 07/19/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | No comments |
| 07/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope and the mechanical systems using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, C401.2, and C406, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include the NFRC-certified U-factors and solar heat gain factors (SHGF) of the fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 4. Show that each HVAC unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012. 5. Show that the parking garage has mechanical ventilation per Section 404, IMC 2012. If the garage ventilation is not to operate at full flow rate at all times, show how the sequence of operation is to be controlled. Reference: Sections 404.1.and 404.2, IMC 2012. |
| 07/25/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/26/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields, Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: New office building with Garage - 1120 N 4th Avenue Building Plan Package (1st Review) T16CM04943 (Related to DP16-0111 and DP14-0072) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 26, 2016 DUE DATE: August 4, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for the new Office / Garage building based on the approved DP14-0072 and as it relates the zoning review purview of the building plans. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the approved DP, zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans Reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare it to the approved DP14-0072 to ensure that any changes that may be or are made to the building plans are still within substantial compliance with the approved DP. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: (Revised building plan package) |
| 08/02/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A0.0; CODE ANALYSIS (GOVERNING REGULATIONS): PLEASE ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 TO THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 2. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 5: THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA PER STORY FOR NON-SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES (SECTION 508.3) IN TABLE 503 FOR A TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION, B OCCUPANCY GROUP, IS 23,000 SF. SECTION 506.3 INCREASES THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA BY 300% FOR BUILDINGS WITH NO MORE THAN ONE STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE. USING THIS INFORMATION, PLEASE REVISE THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA PER STORY FOR THE SECOND FLOOR INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. IN THAT SAME SECTION, REVISE THE "AREA INCREASE FOR FULLY SPRINKLERED (Ia)" TO 300% PER THE IBC SECTION 506.3. 3. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 5: THE FIRST FLOOR HAS SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES (SECTION 508.4). PLEASE INDICATE THE CALCULATION ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA FOR THE FIRST FLOOR USING SECTION 508.4.2. 4. SHEET A0.2; CODE SECTION 4: THE SECTION INDICATES AN S-1 OCCUPANCY IN THE PARKING GARAGE. PLEASE REVISE. 5. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: THE SECOND PARAGRAPH INDICATES "CORRIDOR WALLS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE SMOKE PARTITIONS PER SECTION 704.11 (SEE SECTION 1017.1)". BOTH SECTION REFERENCES ARE INCORRECT. PLEASE REVISE. 6. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: SHAFT ENCLOSURES INDICATES "SHAFT WALLS SHALL HAVE A 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING PER SECTION 707.4". PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE. 7. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH INDICATES THE "BOTTOM OF MECHANICAL SHAFTS NOT EXTENDING TO THE BOTTOM OF THE BUILDING" WILL BE PROTECTED PER SECTION 707.11.1 OR 707.11.3. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERNCES. 8. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: THE FIFTH PARAGRAPH INDICATES "PER SECTION 707.14.1, ELEVATOR LOBBIES" ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 9. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: THE LAST PARAGRAPH INDICATES CERTAIN SECOND STORY WINDOWS MUST BE RATED PER SECTION 705.8.4. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 10. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 8: PLEASE REVISE THE IBC TABLE REFERENCE. 11. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 10: IN PARAGRAPH ONE, IT IS INDICATED THAT "COMMON PATHS OF EGRESS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' PER 1014.3 EXCEPTION 1". THERE IS NO EXCEPTION 1 IN THIS SECTION/TABLE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 12. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 10: THE THIRD PARAGRAPH REFERENCES TABLE 1016.1 FOR EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 13. SHEET A0.2; CODE PLANS: PLEASE SUMMARIZE ON THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR EACH FLOOR. ALSO, INDICATE THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD ON EACH FLOOR FOR EACH OCCUPANCY TYPE. 14. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 11: THE FIRST PARAGRAPH REFERENCES FIGURE 404.2.3.1 FOR CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR DOORS. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 15. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 11: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE TO SECTION 1007.4 IN THE THIRD PARAGRAPH (ACCESSIBLE ELEVATOR). 16. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 12: THE SECOND PARAGRAPH REFERENCES 1210.1 FOR TILE EXTENDING 6" MINIMUM UP RESTROOM WALLS. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE AND THE MINIMUM EXTENSION. 17. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 15: THE ROOF ASSEMBLY REFERENCES TABLE 1501.1 FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF ROOF COVERINGS. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. 18. SHEET A0.2: SEVERAL REFERENCES TO CODE SECTIONS AND TABLES HAVE BEEN ERRONEOUS ON THIS SHEET. PLEASE VERIFY ALL CODE REFERENCES. 19. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 7: THE LAST PARAGRAPH INDICATES A SEPARATION OF THE NEW BUILDING TO EXISTING VISITATION HOUSES. PLEASE REVIEW THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENT FOR THE EXTERIOR WALLS (SECTION 705 AND TABLE 602) IN THOSE AREAS. 20. SHEET A0.2; CHAPTER 29: PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES PER THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. INCLUDE NUMBER OF FIXTURES REQUIRED AND NUMBER OF FIXTURES PROVIDED. 21. SHEET A1.0 (BUILDING AREAS); SHEET A0.2 (CHAPTER 5): THE TOTAL OCCUPIED SF INDICATED ON SHEET A1.0 IS 40,515 SF. PLEASE COMPARE THAT SF TO THE SF LISTED ON SHEET A0.2. VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE ACTUAL SF AND HOW THESE NUMBERS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. 22. GENERAL: PLEASE ADD NORTH ARROWS TO ALL PLANS. 23. SHEET A1.1; ACCESSIBLE ROUTES: NOTES ON PLANS 1 AND 5 INDICATE "NEW WALKWAY MAINTAINS SLOPE LESS THAN 5% IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL, THEREFORE NO RAMP/RAILINGS REQUIRED". PER THE IBC SECTION 1010.9, RAMPS WITH A RISE GREATER THAN 6" SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS (SECTION 1012) ON BOTH SIDES. PLEASE VERIFY. 24. SHEET A1.1; ACCESSIBLE ROUTES: PLEASE VERIFY WHETHER RAMP EDGE PROTECTION (SECTION 10.10.10) IS REQUIRED. 25. SHEETS A2.1 AND A2.2; FLOOR PLAN: THE SOUTH EXTERIOR WALLS DO NOT INDICATE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALL DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE VISITATION HOUSES (PER NOTE ON SHEET A0.2). PLEASE CLARIFY. 26. SHEETS A2.1 AND A2.2; WALL TYPES: FOR ANY WALL USED AS A FIRE RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLY (MASONRY OR STUD), PLEASE INDICATE THE U.L. LISTING NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 27. SHEETS A2.1 AND A2.2; FLOOR TYPES: FOR THE FLOORS USED AS A FIRE RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLY, PLEASE INDICATE THE U.L. LISTING NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 28. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: THE EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL NORTH OF GRID LINE 3 ON GRID D INDICATES AN M1 WALL. IS THIS CORRECT? 29. SHEET A2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (SECTION 2): THE SECTION INDICATES A DOUBLE DOOR (112a NEAR GRID 2), WHILE THE SECTION IS CUT AT A SINGLE DOOR (104c NEAR GRID 4). PLEASE REVISE. 30. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: THERE ARE NUMEROUS LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN WHERE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED STUD WALLS ARE INDICATED (P1h). PLEASE VERIFY THESE NEED TO BE RATED IN THE AREAS SHOWN. 31. SHEET A2.1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A0.2 (CODE PLAN): THE CODE PLAN INDICATES THE ASSEMBLY AREA (NORTH OF THE MAIN LOBBY) IS SEPARATED FROM THE OFFICE AREA WITH A ONE HOUR RATED WALL. IS THE GLASS WALL (AW14) LOCATED NORTH OF GRID 4 INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SEPARATION ASSEMBLY? PLEASE REFERENCE THE SCHEDULE LOCATION FOR AW14. 32. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: DOOR 104b (ON GRID D NORTH OF GRID 4) IS NOT INDICATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE (SHEET A9.0). PLEASE PROVIDE. 33. SHEET A2.1; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE THE WALL TYPE AROUND THE ELEVATOR (RATED MASONRY). 34. SHEET A2.2; FLOOR PLAN: THERE ARE NUMEROUS LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN WHERE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED STUD WALLS ARE INDICATED (P1h). PLEASE VERIFY THESE NEED TO BE RATED IN THE AREAS SHOWN. 35. SHEET A2.2 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A0.2 (CODE PLAN 3): THE CODE PLAN INDICATES THE HATCHED AREA INDICATES A ONE HOUR RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY, WHILE THE SECOND FLOOR PLAN INDICATES AN F1 FLOOR TYPE (NOT RATED). PLEASE CLARIFY. 36. SHEET A2.3; ENLARGED PLAN 1: ROOM 108 IS INDICATED TO BE A FAMILY RESTROOM. PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.2.1.2, A FAMILY TOILET ROOM SHALL INCLUDE ONLY ONE WATER CLOSET AND ONE LAVATORY (ONE URINAL MAY BE ADDED). THIS FAMILY RESTROOM DOES NOT MEET THAT CRITERIA. PLEASE REVISE. 37. SHEET A2.3; ENLARGED PLAN 2: WHEN PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS ARE DETERMINED (SEE COMMENT 20), VERIFY THE UNISEX TOILETS ARE PART OF THE MALE OR FEMALE REQUIREMENTS (THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE ADDED TO BOTH SEXES FOR EACH TOILET ROOM). 38. SHEET A4.1; SECTIONS 1 AND 2: A DETAIL ON SECTION 1 AT THE FIRST FLOOR WALL, A DETAIL ON SECTION 2 AT THE HEAD OF THE OPERABLE PARTITION, AND A DETAIL ON SECTION 2 AT THE WALL UP TO THE ROOF ON GRID 2.3 NEED TO HAVE THE DETAIL CALL-OUTS COMPLETED. 39. SHEETS A4.1 AND A4.2; SECTIONS: PLEASE VERIFY ALL RATED WALL AND FLOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE NOTED CORRECTLY ON THE SECTIONS. 40. SHEET A4.2; SECTIONS 2 AND 3: PLEASE COMPLETE DETAIL CALL-OUTS ON THESE SECTIONS. 41. SHEET A5.0; KITCHEN ELEVATIONS 17 AND 18: PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.4, PLEASE REVISE THE EQUIPMENT AND COUNTERS TO BE ACCESSIBLE. 42. SHEET A5.1; VENDING ELEVATIONS 14 AND 15: VERIFY THE VENDING AREAS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY. 43. SHEET A7.0; ROOF PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE FALL PROTECTION NOTES AND DETAILS ON THIS SHEET. THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S5.1 INDICATES A CONNECTOR IN THE ROOF FOR THE FALL PROTECTION, BUT PLEASE INDICATE THE ACTUAL MEMBERS FOR THE FALL PROTECTION AND HOW THEY ATTACH TO THE ROOF CONNECTORS. 44. SHEET A8.0; STAIR PLAN 4: THE IBC SECTION 1009.4 INDICATES THE MINIMUM CLEAR SISTANCE BETWEEN HANDRAILS IS 44". THIS PLAN INDICATES 3'-8" BETWEEN STRINGERS. PLEASE VERIFY THIS MEETS THE IBC REQUIREMENT. 45. SHEET A8.0; STAIR PLAN 7: WHAT IS THE CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HANDRAILS AT THIS STAIR? PLEASE PROVIDE ON THE DRAWING. 46. SHEET A9.0: PLEASE VERIFY ALL DOORS AND GLAZING IN RATED ASSEMBLIES MEET THE IBC REQUIREMENTS OF TABLES 716.3 AND 716.5. 47. SHEET A9.5; DETAIL 1: PLEASE REVISE THE MOUNTING HEIGHT OF BOTH HORIZONTAL GRAB BARS TO 33"-36" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURES 604.5.1 AND 604.5.2. 48. SHEET S1.5 (LINTEL SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 16): THE LINTEL LT1 INDICATES TOP AND BOTTOM REINFORCING IN THE CALCULATIONS WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES BOTTOM REINFORCING ONLY. PLEASE CLARIFY. 49. SHEET S2.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 58): PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE FLOOR BEAMS AROUND THE EAST STAIR (W12X14'S TYPICAL) REQUIRE HEADED STUDS AS SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS. 50. SHEET S2.2 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEETS 54 AND 55): PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE FLOOR BEAMS AROUND THE EAST STAIR (W12X14'S) REQUIRE HEADED STUDS AS SHOWN IN THE CALCULATIONS. 51. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (GROUND FLOOR); SHEET 40: THE BEAM SUMMARY FOR BEAMS 83, 105, 118, 121, AND 139 DOES NOT INDICATE THESE BEAM SIZES IN THE CALCULATIONS. IT APPEARS THESE ARE BEAMS WITH ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOADS, IN A BRACED FRAME, OR A DUPLICATE DESIGN OF ANOTHER BEAM. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THESE BEAMS (OR REFERENCE THE CALCULATION LOCATION) AS REQUIRED. 52. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (GROUND FLOOR); SHEET 40: THE BEAMS AROUND THE EAST STAIR ARE DENOTED AS 36, 37, AND 38. PLEASE VERIFY THESE ARE CORRECT NUMBERS. 53. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SECOND FLOOR); SHEET 41: THE BEAM SUMMARY FOR BEAMS 29, 64, 69, 106, 134, 158, 174, AND 218 DOES NOT INDICATE THESE BEAM SIZES IN THE CALCULATIONS. IT APPEARS THESE ARE BEAMS WITH ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOADS, IN A BRACED FRAME, OR A DUPLICATE DESIGN OF ANOTHER BEAM. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THESE BEAMS (OR REFERENCE THE CALCULATION LOCATION) AS REQUIRED. 54. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 41: THE BEAMS AROUND THE EAST STAIR ARE DENOTED AS 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, AND 20. PLEASE VERIFY THESE ARE CORRECT NUMBERS. 55. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (ROOF); SHEET 42: THE BEAM SUMMARY FOR BEAMS 60, 112, 143, 156, AND 204 DOES NOT INDICATE THESE BEAM SIZES IN THE CALCULATIONS. IT APPEARS THESE ARE BEAMS IN A BRACED FRAME. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THESE BEAMS (OR REFERENCE THE CALCULATION LOCATION) AS REQUIRED. 56. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (FOUNDATION); SHEET 87: THE COLUMN DESIGN SUMMARY HAS SEVERAL COLUMNS IN THE CALCULATIONS THAT DO NOT MATCH THE SIZE SHOWN ON SHEET S2.0. PLEASE CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THESE COLUMNS (OR REFERENCE THE CALCULATION LOCATION) AS REQUIRED. 57. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; FOUNDATION DESIGN: PLEASE VERIFY ALL FOUNDATION CALCULATIONS FOR ALL WALLS, COLUMNS, AND BRACED FRAMES ARE INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS. 58. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/05/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Add Plan sheet E1.4 to the electrical drawing index on the cover sheet A0.0. #2. Ref: plan sheet E4.0. The listed bus ampacity for MSB on the panel schedule does not correlate with the info on the one line diagram. #3. Provide for tamper resistant receptacles where applicable as required per NEC 406.2, 406.14. #4. Indicate conduit, conductor types and sizes for the elevator equipment. #5. Special systems plans show the locations of fire alarm devices. No provisions in the plans for the Fire Alarm Control Cabinet or wiring.? Ref :2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. |