Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM04712
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET x1.1; CODE ANALYSIS: IN THE IBC SECTION 3411.8 (ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING FACILITIES), ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES FOR PUBLIC USE MUST MEET THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1105. ARE AT LEAST 60% OF PUBLIC ENTRANCES ACCESSIBLE? PLEASE VERIFY ON THE PLAN. 2. SHEET x1.1; CODE ANALYSIS: THIS SHEET INDICATES THE MAXIMUM ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE WITHOUT AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS 250'. IF WE HAVE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, THE DISTANCE IS 250'. IF NOT, IT IS 200'. PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET dm1: PLEASE REMOVE THE "NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION" NOTE IN THE TITLE BLOCK. 4. SHEETS gsn AND s1: THE ENGINEER/ARCHITECT OF RECORD MUST STAMP, SIGN, AND DATE ALL DRAWINGS. 5. SHEET gsn: PLEASE ADD NOTES FOR MASONRY. 6. SHEET s1; KEYNOTES: IN NOTE 2, PLEASE INDICATE #3'S AT 24" O.C. 'EACH WAY'. 7. SHEET s1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET d1 (DETAIL 3): A NOTE ON THE PLAN INDICATES A 6" CONCRETE WALL (AT THE SOUTH WALL OF THE ADDITION), WHILE DETAIL 3/d1 SIMILAR INDICATES A MASONRY WALL. PLEASE COORDINATE. 8. SHEET s2; SHEARWALL SCHEDULE: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN WHERE SHEARWALLS SW1 AND SW2 ARE LOCATED. 9. SHEET s2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET d2 (DETAIL 2): DETAIL 2 INDICATES GALVANIZED N-DECK, BUT ON THE PLAN, THE DETAIL IS CUT AT TWO LOCATIONS, ONE WITH PLYWOOD DECK AND ONE WITH METAL DECK. PLEASE REVISE. 10. SHEET s2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET d2 (DETAIL 9): DETAIL 9 INDICATES OPENINGS IN STUD WALLS, BUT ARE CUT ON THE PLAN AT NON-OPENING LOCATIONS. PLEASE REVISE. 11. SHEET s2; FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE REMOVE OR REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE 5/D2 ON THE EAST WALL (5/D2 IS A MASONRY DETAIL). 12. SHEET d1; DETAIL 7: PLEASE INDICATE THE PIT WALL AND SLAB THICKNESSES AND REINFORCING. 13. SHEET d1; DETAIL 2: PLEASE INDICATE THE COLUMN GROUT, BASE PLATE, AND ANCHOR BOLTS ARE ENCASED IN CONCRETE. 14. SHEET d1; DETAIL 10: THE DETAIL INDICATES "NOT USED", BUT IS CUT ON SHEET s1 AT THE NEW RAMP. PLEASE COORDINATE. 15. SHEET d2; FRAMING DETAIL 9: PLEASE INDICATE THE WALL STUD SIZES AND SPACINGS AT TYPICAL FRAMED WALLS. 16. SHEET d2; DETAILS 1, 2, AND 4: THESE DETAILS REFERENCE VERTICAL MASONRY WALL REINFORCING PER FOUNDATION DETAILS. NO FOUNDATION DETAILS REFERENCE THE MASONRY WALL REINFORCING. PLEASE COORDINATE. 17. SHEET d2; DETAIL 6: ONE NOTE INDICATES AN EXISTING 8" MASONRY WALL, WHILE A SECOND NOTE INDICATES AN 8" CMU WALL. PLEASE REMOVE ONE OF THESE. 18. SHEET a1; FLOOR PLAN: ARE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORED IN THIS BUILDING? IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS A LIST OF ALL THOSE MATERIALS, AND VERIFY THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLES 307.1(1) AND 307.1(2). 19. GENERAL: NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO SETS FOR REVIEW. 20. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/11/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved |