Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T16CM04683
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the component descriptions of the Envelope Compliance Certificates for buildings A2 and B3 using the "other" roof and wall constructions. [Third comment: The presented U-value calculations are to be used in lieu of the wall and roof menu items in COMcheck program; enter your wall or roof type as "other" and use your calculated U-value in place of entering the R-values for cavity and continuous insulation. None of the wall types shown on the drawings have continuous insulation. The window types shown on drawing A3.00 and noted in specification sections 08411 and 08520 do not indicate that they are required to be NFRC-certified. In addition, no windows are included in the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate assemblies.] [Second comment: Comment no resolved; the wall and roof sections shown on sheet A2.00 do not correspond to the component descriptions in the envelope compliance certificates for either construction or insulation. Provide documentation of the U-value determination for the walls and roofs. The envelope compliance certificate calls for high efficiency HVAC systems but the mechanical compliance certificate calls for reduced interior lighting power; some of the interior lighting compliance certificates reference high efficiency HVAC while others call for reduced interior lighting power: coordinate the approaches to the additional energy efficiency requirement. None of the windows scheduled on the drawings appear to be NFRC-certified as required by Section 303.1, IECC 2012 which will result in the default values being required in the calculations.] [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. walls and roofs). The walls and roofs of shipping containers are not included in the list of components in COMcheck so the calculation of U-values must be documented. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. While some of the calculated heating/cooling loads have been revised, the cooling capacity for each fan coil is not available to compare with the calculated cooling loads. [Third comment: Justify the cooling capacities for HP-1, HP-2, HP-4., HP-5, HP-7, HP-8, HP-9a, HP-9b, HP-10, and HP-13 all of which appear to be in excess of the calculated cooling loads. Verify that the baseboard heaters BBH-1 and BBH-2 are capable of maintaining the spaces they serve at a minimum temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit on a design day per Section 309, IMC 2012.] [Second comment: The equipment tags used in the cooling/heating load calculations do not appear to have been updated to coordinate with the scheduled equipment shown on the drawings.] [Initial comment: Coordinate the air system names in the cooling/heating load calculations with the equipment schedules on the plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 11/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/21/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | DP must be approved first. |
| 11/23/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/23/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/23/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/23/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/23/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |