Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM04683
Parcel: 11620636B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T16CM04683
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/30/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/31/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Within each plumbing system, at least one vent shall extend from inside the building to the outside. Reference: Section 918.7, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide waste and vent isometrics for the kitchens.]
2. The architect's determination of the required number of plumbing fixtures is still based on fractional fixtures. In addition, only the assembly occupancy can substitute urinals for up to 67% of the required water closets; with only two water closets required for the men, only one urinal can be counted as one of the required water closets. Reference: Section 419.2, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: The number of required fixtures shown in Table 2902.1, IBC 2012 is based upon the minimum fixtures required for each person or fraction of the number of persons. Since fractional fixtures cannot be installed, fractional numbers for fixtures shall also be rounded up to the next whole number. Reference: footnote (a), Table 2902.1, IBC 2012.]
3. Provide backflow prevention devices listed to ASSE 1022 for each beverage dispenser. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Appliances (e.g. soda dispensers, ice makers, etc.) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC 2012 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.]
4. Buildings A and B have roofs with scuppers. Provide the roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations; provide construction details for the scuppers and secondary drainage. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012.]
5. Verify that the materials used for the storm sewers and the building sewers passing beneath the buildings are included in Table 702.2, IPC 2012.
08/31/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Principle Planner

PROJECT: 267 S. Avenida Del Convento
T16CM04683
Building Plan (2nd Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2016

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. It appears that the proposed building plans matches what is shown on development package DP16-0084 but until the development package is approved the building plans cannot be approve.

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
08/31/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
09/01/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE.
#1. Per the last electrical plan review comments and response, additional information will need to be added to the construction documents or plans for clarification or correction.
(a) Per comment and response #2. The Interior Lighting Compliance Certificates seem to be missing for units or structures H1 thru H8 and A3. Also the luminaire counts in the com check do not seem to be accurate for corresponding units. For example, unit Plan sheet E2.1 shows unit G1 with 31 luminaires, while the com check shows 36 ?
(b) Per comment and response #3. The TUCSON / PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE compliance information needs to be on the plans as required and outlined per sec. 104.
(c) Please identify the House panels 1,2,3, on the panel schedules and the one line diagram.
(d) Per comment and response #6. The information requested was to indicate conduit and conductor sizes and types, quantities for the secondary conductors feeding the electrical service equipment, not DP3.
(e) If panel DP3 is to be deleted from this project indicate this on the plans or remove it and its feeder.
Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1 and 2011 NEC.
09/07/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change The Development Package must be approved first.
09/09/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Comment no resolved; the wall and roof sections shown on sheet A2.00 do not correspond to the component descriptions in the envelope compliance certificates for either construction or insulation. Provide documentation of the U-value determination for the walls and roofs. The envelope compliance certificate calls for high efficiency HVAC systems but the mechanical compliance certificate calls for reduced interior lighting power; some of the interior lighting compliance certificates reference high efficiency HVAC while others call for reduced interior lighting power: coordinate the approaches to the additional energy efficiency requirement. None of the windows scheduled on the drawings appear to be NFRC-certified as required by Section 303.1, IECC 2012 which will result in the default values being required in the calculations. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. walls and roofs). The walls and roofs of shipping containers are not included in the list of components in COMcheck so the calculation of U-values must be documented. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. The equipment tags used in the cooling/heating load calculations do not appear to have been updated to coordinate with the scheduled equipment shown on the drawings. [Initial comment: Coordinate the air system names in the cooling/heating load calculations with the equipment schedules on the plans. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
3. Verify the floor areas used in calculating the required openings for natural ventilation; all occupied areas require ventilation. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show how natural ventilation has been provided (i.e. add the floor area being ventilated for each building shown in the outside air calculation table). Reference: Section 402.1, IMC 2012.]
4. The requested details do not appear to have been added to the resubmitted drawing set. [Initial comment: Provide details of the grease exhaust duct installation including balancing data and separation of the duct from combustible materials. Show how transitions of the grease duct are designed to prevent the accumulation of grease. Reference: Section 506, IMC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
5. The requested details do not appear to have been added to the resubmitted drawing set. Details showing how the hoods are to be installed in these structures cannot be addressed by the hood manufacturer's shop drawings. [Initial comment: Provide construction, installation, and air balancing details of the two Type I grease hoods alluded to in buildings J1 and B3. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]