Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM04539
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comment. Also provide a written response. #1. Please review and verify the Outdoor Lighting cala's. The total lumen count exceeds the allowable lumen cap per table 401.1 of the Outdoor Lighting Code ? |
| 07/19/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET D.1 (KEYNOTES); SHEET A.2 (EAST ELEVATION): KEYNOTE 6 ON THE EAST ELEVATION INDICATES TO REMOVE EXISTING METAL ROOFING, WHILE KEYNOTE 8 ON SHEET D.1 INDICATES TO REMOVE EXISTING MISSION TILE IN THE SAME AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A.2; WEST ELEVATION: ON THE LEFT END OF THE ELEVATION, AN ELEVATION NOTE INDICATES 9'-0" A.F.F. BOTTOM OF AWNINGS, BUT DEPICTS THE TOP OF THE AWNING. PLEASE REVISE. 3. SHEET A.6; DETAIL 11: PLEASE ADD DETAIL 11 TO THIS SHEET. 4. SHEET S.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: THERE IS ONE DETAIL 2/S.3 CUT ON THE EAST WALL AND ONE ON THE WEST WALL. SHOULD THESE BE DESIGNATED AS 2B/S.3? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET S.2 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S.3 (DETAIL 5): BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2 ON THE WEST WALL, DETAIL 5/S.3 IS CUT ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT. PLEASE VERIFY. 6. SHEETS S.2 AND S.3: PLEASE PROVIDE THE ENGINEER OF RECORDS SEAL ON THESE DRAWINGS. 7. SHEET S.2; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: WHAT DO THE DOUBLE LINES AT THE ROOF TRUSSES (AT MECHANICAL UNIT LOCATIONS) INDICATE? PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |