Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T16CM04253
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The envelope compliance certificate shows R-values for continuous insulation on the walls but the wall sections and keynotes do not show the source of this insulation. The R-value for the roof indicates a continuous insulation R-value of 26.6 which appears to include the roof structure (e.g. built-up roof, etc.). The R-values for the roof (and the walls) are included in the COMcheck software and should not be added to the insulation inputs. [Initial comment: Clarify the different U-values and R-values used in the calculations shown on sheet A.7, the Envelope Compliance Certificate, and the cooling/heating load calculations. Correct the arithmetic, use recognized R-values for the components, and recognize the parallel heat transfer paths. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 07/15/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The size and route of the T&P relief pipe is not shown. [Initial comment: Show the size and route of the T&P relief pipe from the water heater. Reference: Section 504, IPC 2012.] 2. The drains for the evaporative coolers appear to terminate at fixture P8 but P8 is not specified and is not shown on the waste & vent riser diagram. [Initial comment: Show the size, route, and termination of the drains for the evaporative coolers. Reference: Section 802.1.5, IPC 2012.] 3. Where is P7; is it one of the two P6 appliances shown the plumbing plans? (Note: there are several "orphan" notes on the plumbing plan on sheet P.1.) |
| 07/21/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE A SITE PLAN IN THIS SUBMITTAL PER THE IBC SECTION 107.2.5. 2. SHEET A.1; FLOOR PLAN: THE EAST EXTERIOR WALL OF THE BUILDING IS NOTED TO BE A ONE HOUR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY. ON THIS SHEET, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ENLARGED SECTION OF THE WALL INDICATING ALL WALL MATERIALS, AND PROVIDE A U.L. LISTING NUMBER FOR THAT ASSEMBLY. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR EXTERIOR WALLS: WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE EAST EXTERIOR WALL? 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6; ENLARGED RESTROOM PLANS ON SHEET A.1: THE DOOR INTO THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM DOES NOT MEET THE 12" MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SPACE ON THE PUSH SIDE OF THE DOOR PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 404.2.3.2(b). PLEASE REVISE. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11; SHEET A.7 (ELEVATION 3): THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR ON THE ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1 IS NOT INDICATED ON THE ELEVATION. PLEASE REVISE. 6. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/25/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/27/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3206 E. Valencia T16CM04253 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 27, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with the development package, DP16-0066. The building plans appear to match the development package but until the building plans are approved by all other PDSD review agencies Zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 08/03/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |