Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES
Permit Number - T16CM03418
Review Name: PLANS OK TO SUBMIT - RES
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/26/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
05/26/2016 | JLINVIL1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/06/2016 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T16CM03418 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, highlighting any changes, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code, 2012 International Fire Code, 2011 National Electrical Code and Arizona Revised Statutes. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: All corrections and revisions shall be made on original tracings or a finished reproducible set. Return two sets along with a set of the first submission for reference. Pen or pencil corrections on final prints will not be acceptable. To avoid delays, ensure that all corrections have been made, are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable detail and note sheets. (Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions). Incorporate changes on originals and provide two copied sets for review. GENERAL NOTES: 1. The panel bus and feeder conductors placed between the two source breakers require a rating not less than 120% of the sum of those breakers, NEC 690.64 & 705.12 (D). The distribution panel bus and FEEDER CONDUCTOR (6) requires a rating for receiving electrical power from two sources. Show a minimum 75 AMP feeder conductor rating when placed between source breakers of 50A (utility) & 40A (PV). The #8 THWN-2 feeder (6) is undersized, therefore increase the conductor rating to 75A, or relocate the backfeed breaker to the service panel. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |