Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T16CM03188
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/14/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
07/14/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
07/14/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
07/20/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1; TENANT CLASSIFICATION: THE SHELL DESIGNATION DOES NOT DICTATE THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION FOR EACH TENANT SPACE. THIS IS CLEARLY A RESTAURANT (AS INDICATED ON SHEET CVR UNDER GENERAL BUILDING INFORMATION) AND SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS AN A-2. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2; ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: THE ALLOWABLE SF FOR AN A-2 OCCUPANCY TYPE IS 6000 SF PER THE IBC TABLE 503. THEREFORE, THE ALLOWABLE SF WITH THE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INCREASE IS 24,000 SF. PLEASE REVISE. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 3; BUILDING LIMITATIONS: IF YOU ARE NOT TRYING TO MODIFY THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT WITH A SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN THIS TENANT SPACE, THERE ARE TWO LIMITATIONS THAT MUST BE CONSIDERED. IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS NON-SEPARATED (SEE IBC SECTION 508.3), THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA AND HEIGHT SHALL BE BASED ON THE MOST RESTRICTIVE ALLOWANCES FOR ALL OCCUPANCY GROUPS IN THE BUILDING. IF A RESTAURANT MOVED INTO ONE OF THE SPACES AND DID NOT SPRINKLER THAT SPACE, THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING WOULD BE 6000 SF, WHICH WOULD NOT WORK. IF THE ENTIRE BUILDING NEEDED TO BE SEPARATED, TABLE 508.4 WOULD BRING FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALLS (BARRIERS) INTO PLAY. YOUR RESTAURANT IS REQUIRED TO BE SPRINKLERED BY THE IBC SECTION 903.2.1.2(2). IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT (STORIES) FOR YOUR SPRINKLER SYSTEM, THE ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA SHOULD ALSO NOT BE INCREASED ON THE DRAWINGS. YOU CAN LEAVE THOSE REQUIREMENTS (HEIGHT/STORIES) AS THEY ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: THE DEAD END CORRIDOR LENGTH IS NOT ALLOWED TO BE INCREASED TO 50' PER THE IBC SECTION 1018.4 FOR AN 'A' OCCUPANCY TYPE. PLEASE REVISE. 5. SHEET CVR; OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS: THE DINING/SEATS INDICATES THERE ARE 130 ACTUAL SEATS IN THE SPACE. PLEASE VERIFY. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE 130 ON THIS PLAN. 6. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
07/25/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |