Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM03072
Parcel: 128141380

Address:
5278 E 21ST ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T16CM03072
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/24/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review

PROJECT: The Hermitage No-Kill Cat Shelter and Sanctuary
Rebuild and Remodel (1st Review)
T16CM03072

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2016

DUE DATE: June 1, 2016

COMMENTS: Address the following zoning comments.

Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Comment 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. List on the cover sheet the zoning use classification, Commercial Land Use Group "Animal Service" per the PDSD Zoning Administrator letter of Non-conforming. Since the use is not allowed outright there are no use specifics standards that are applicable other than any conditions of the non-conforming laid by Russlyn Wells.

Comment 2. After discussing the project with the Interim Building Official Clayton Trevillyan, it was decided to include an HPZ folder due to the extent of the proposed demolition of the existing building. While the property is not zoned historic the building is greater than 50 years old and at a minimum a minor HPZ review would be required. Please contact Jonathan Mabry (837-6968) or Michael Taku (837-4963) for additional information on the type of review that may be required. If a HPZ review is done by Jonathan or Michael, list the case number on the cover sheet.

Comment 3. Clarify if the demo permit application T16BU00645 is still active and how does it affect this project.

Comment 4. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and verify that the zoning review comments have been addressed and that any additional or applicable review and approval process has been completed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov
05/25/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET C1; CODE ANALYSIS (ALLOWABLE AREA): SECTION 506.3 OF THE 2012 IBC INDICATES THE 300% INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE AREA DUE TO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS IS IN ADDITION TO THE TABLE 503 VALUE. THEREFORE, THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR THIS PROJECT IS 9000 + 3X9000 = 36,000 SF. PLEASE REVISE.
2. SHEET A1; PERIMETER LAYOUT NOTE: NOTE 3 INDICATES TO REFERENCE TO A1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE SHEET NUMBER.
3. SHEET A2; WALL TYPES: WALL TYPES 2 AND 5 INDICATE TYPE 'X' GWB ON EACH SIDE, BUT DOES NOT SHOW THAT ON THE SECTION. PLEASE VERIFY.
4. SHEET A2 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A8 (SECTIONS 1 AND 2): THE BUILDING SECTIONS ARE REVERSED ON SHEET A8. PLEASE VERIFY.
5. SHEET A7; DOOR SCHEDULE: PER THE IBC SEECTION 1008.1.9.3, LOCKS AND LATCHES ARE PERMITTED IF THEY MEET SPECIFIC CRITERIA. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE HARDWARE NOTES ON THIS SHEET WHICH ITEMS WILL BE APPLIED TO THE EGRESS DOORS ON THIS PROJECT.
6. SHEET A7: PLEASE INDICATE AN ELEVATION AND PLAN FOR THE HIGH/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 602.
7. SHEET S0.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): FOR A 1500 PSF ALLOWABLE VERTICAL PRESSURE, A MINIMUM 1'-6" BEARING DEPTH FROM THE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE IS REQUIRED. A 1'-0" BEARING DEPTH PROVIDES A PRESCRIPTIVE 1000 PSF ALLOWABLE VERTICAL PRESSURE. PLEASE REVISE.
8. SHEETS S2.1 AND S2.2; FOUNDATION DETAILS: PLEASE INDICATE A MINIMUM BEARING DEPTH OF 1'-6" FROM THE LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE IF A 1500 PSF ALLOWABLE VERTICAL SOIL PRESSURE IS TO BE USED.
9. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
05/25/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
05/25/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The "Additional Efficiency Package Requirements" noted in COMcheck (C406, IECC 2012) is not applicable to tenant improvements or building additions, only to new construction. Revising the COMcheck from new construction to alteration will also resolve the "system compliance fails" notice in the mechanical compliance certificate. Reference: Section C401.2.1, IECC 2012.
2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the revisions to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (i.e. revise the envelope compliance certificate: this is an alteration, not new construction). Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Coordinate the fenestration specifications shown in the drawings with the U-value and SHGF used in COMcheck. All fenestration U-value and SHGF shall be NFRC-certified. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
4. Revise the heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson.
5. The cat shelter by definition has many animal holding areas which will require 0.9 CFM per square foot of exhaust. Identify these areas in the ventilation calculations. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
6. Provide listing information for the clothes dryer to show that the proposed dryer exhaust duct is sized correctly. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 504.6.1, IMC 2012.
05/25/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
05/25/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Ref: Plan Sheet C1.
Correct the DRAWING INDEX to reflect the Electrical plans as submitted, or add missing Electrical plan as necessary.
#2. Ref: Plan Sheet E2.0.
Verify voltage requirement for K5 luminaire (fixture schedule) shows 277V. Electrical system voltage for the building is 120/240 volts.
#3. Ref: Plan Sheet E2.0 and E4.0.
(a). The feeders shown for the X-Ray on the feeder schedule (E2) do not correlate with the one-line diagram (E4).
(b). Include a concrete encased grounding electrode (ufer) for the service grounding electrode system as required per NEC 250.50.
Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC
05/25/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Verify the location of the proposed indirect waste receptor (Floor Sink) in room 127 is visible for inspection and has ready access for cleaning. Reference: Section 802.3, IPC 2012.
2. Show the use of a floor sink in lieu of a stand pipe for the clothes washer is consistent with the manufacturer's instructions. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012.
06/02/2016 FRANK PODGORSKI HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DECISION REC'D HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DECISION Passed This property is not located in the HPZ

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/21/2016 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed