Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM03020
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Waiting for revisions to drawings. Allowable area is not correct and a fire wall separating buildings was not included in these drawings.-kenb |
| 05/24/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the location of the sediment traps shown in detail 6/P0.2 to be downstream of the appliance shut off valve, as close to the equipment as possible. Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012. 2. The showers do not appear to have pre-fabricated receptors; provide details to show that the construction of the receptors complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012. 3. The specified water heaters can each produce 5.4 GPM with a 70 degree Fahrenheit temperature rise for a total flow of 16.2 GPM. Based on the fixture unit calculations however, the hot water demand appears to be about 41 GPM. How will the water heaters be able to meet the hot water demand? Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012. 4. Water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022. Reference: Section 608.16.1, IPC 2012. 5. Provide backflow prevention for the water service to the dialysis equipment. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012. |
| 05/24/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the size of the water service and water meter with the civil plans. The civil grading and utilities plan (sheet 6 of 17) indicates a 1-1/2" water service and water meter to the building. 2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for licensed, personal care facilities. Install the backflow prevention assembly in a location accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 05/24/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G-000; APPLICABLE CODES: PLEASE REMOVE THE 2010 ADA ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES FROM THIS SHEET. 2. SHEET G-002; BUILDING DATA: THE OCCUPANT LOAD TABLE INDICATES THE BUILDING AREA IS 18,278 SF, WHILE THE BUILDING DATA TABLE INDICATES 18,254 SF. PLEASE COORDINATE. 3. SHEET G-002; CODES AND REGULATIONS: PLEASE REMOVE ANY REFERENCES TO ADAAG, CITY OF GLENDALE SOUND ATTENUATION, AND 2009 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. 4. SHEET G-002; GENERAL BUILDING LIMITATIONS (MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AREA): DOES THE ACTUAL BUILDING SF (49,364) EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEET G-002: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 407.5.1 ARE MET FOR REFUGE AREAS IN SMOKE COMPARTMENTS, INCLUDING LOCATION OF REFUGE AREA, SIZE REQUIRED FOR REFUGE AREA, AND CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE ACTUAL REFUGE AREA SIZE. 6. SHEET G-002: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 407.7 AND 407.8 ARE MET FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS AND AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION. 7. SHEET G-002: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 1006.2 AND 1006.3 ARE MET FOR THE MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION LEVEL AND MEANS OF EGRESS EMERGENCY POWER FOR ILLUMINATION. 8. SHEET G-100; LIFE SAFETY PLAN: THE 1/16 SCALE PLAN IS TOO SMALL ON THIS SHEET TO CLEARLY DENOTE THE LOCATION OF THE VARIOUS RATED WALLS. PLEASE ENLARGE OR REFERENCE SHEET A-100. 9. SHEET S102; DETAILS T28 AND T29: DO WE HAVE FREESTANDING MASONRY WALLS ON THIS PLAN (TRASH ENCLOSURE ON THE SITE PLAN)? PLEASE VERIFY AND PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 10. SHEET S201; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON THE EAST BUILDING WALL (NEAR BEAM LINE AND THEN FURTHER SOUTH ON THE WALL), THE TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION IS NOT GIVEN. PLEASE PROVIDE. 11. SHEET S201; KEY NOTES: SHOULD NOTE 8 BE DELETED FROM THIS SHEET? PLEASE VERIFY. 12. SHEET S202; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 18 IS INDICATED ON THE FRAMING PLAN, BUT IS NOT IN THE PLAN NOTES. PLEASE PROVIDE. 13. SHEETS S202 AND S301; FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 3 INDICATES A ROOF HATCH OPENING. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN. 14. SHEET S301 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 3): BEAMS B7 AND B8 ARE NOT DESIGNED IN THE CALCULATIONS, AND BEAM B7 (FROM THE CALCULATIONS) IS NOT INDICATED ON SHEET S301. PLEASE VERIFY. 15. SHEET S301; KEYNOTES: IN NOTE 10, PLEASE COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGE 22: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE COLUMN FOOTINGS. PLEASE VERIFY. 17. SHEET A-002; TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN: THE PLAN INDICATES ELEVATION G6/A-002 ON THE SOUTH WALL, WHILE THE ELEVATION TITLE INDICATES THE WEST ELEVATION. PLEASE COORDINATE. 18. SHEET A-002; TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN: SEVERAL DETAILS ON THE PLAN REFERENCE SHEET A-004. PLEASE REVISE. 19. SHEET A-002; NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS: THESE ELEVATIONS HAVE A DETAIL THAT REFERENCE SHEET A-004. PLEASE REVISE. 20. SHEET A-100; FLOOR PLAN: THE CORRIDOR SMOKE BARRIER WALLS ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE REVISE. 21. SHEET A-100; FLOOR PLAN: THE CODE STUDY ON PREVIOUS SHEETS PROVIDES INFORMATION ON HORIZONTAL EXITS, SHAFT ENCLOSURES, EXIT PASSAGEWAYS, AND EXTERIOR AREAS OF ASSISTED RESCUE. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN WHERE THESE AREAS OCCUR, AND PROVIDE THE WALL TYPE PER THE LEGEND ON SHEET A-100. 22. SHEET A-100; KEY NOTES: IN NOTE 1, PLEASE COMPLETE THE DETAIL REFERENCE. 23. SHEET A-100; FLOOR PLAN: STORAGE ROOM 200 INDICATES MEDICAL GAS. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST ON THE DRAWINGS OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL QUANTITIES, AND INDICATE THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITY (PER IBC TABLE 307.1(1) IS NOT EXCEEDED. 24. SHEET A-100; FLOOR PLAN: SEVERAL DETAILS ON THE PLAN REFERENCE SHEET A-602. PLEASE REVISE. 25. SHEET A-100 (LEGEND AND FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A-101: THE FLOOR PLAN AND LEGEND INDICATE A TWO HOUR AREA SEPARATION BARRIER, BUT SHEET A-101 DOES NOT INCLUDE A TWO HOUR WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 26. SHEET A-101: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE ON THIS SHEET TO SEE SECTIONS A1, C1, AND E1 ON SHEET A-500 FOR EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS. 27. SHEET A-110; CEILING PLAN: A SECTION CUT IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER IS INCOMPLETE. PLEASE REVISE. 28. SHEET A-120; ROOF PLAN: THERE ARE SEVERAL SECTION CUTS THAT ARE INCOMPLETE. PLEASE VERIFY. 29. SHEET A-500; SECTIONS A1, C1, AND E1: SEVERAL DETAIL REFERENCES ON THE SECTIONS ARE INCOMPLETE. PLEASE REVISE. 30. GENERAL: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE HANDRAILS/GUARDRAILS AT THE EXTERIOR RAMP MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 1012 AND 1013. 31. GENERAL: PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE PENETRATIONS AT RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 714 AND THE FIRE RESISTANT JOINT SYSTEMS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION T15. 32. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/25/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review PROJECT: Building Expansion Catalina Care Building Plans Review (1st Review) T16CM03020 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2016 DUE DATE: June 6, 2016 COMMENTS: Address the following zoning comments. Comment 1. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance and consistency with the current version of the Development Package but cannot approve them at this time. While the building plans are in substantial compliance with the current version of the DP, the DP has not been approved and requires changes that may affect the building. In addition Zoning cannot approve the building plans at this time until the Commercial Review agencies have approved the plans. Comment 2. Ensure that any changes that are necessary to the DP site plan or building plans and affect one or the other plan are incorporated accordingly. Comment 3. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and compare them to the current version or approved DP for compliance and consistency. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans as required |
| 05/25/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation per Section 403.3, IMC 2012. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 (e.g. see calculations for AC-1 through AC-8). Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012. 2. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridors as return air ducts (e.g. AC-9, AC-10, and AC-11). Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012. 3. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, and C303, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 4. Show that the controls for the proposed HVAC systems meet the requirements of Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. |
| 05/25/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 06/03/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The development package must be approved first. |
| 06/06/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: Plan Sheets, E1.1, E5.1. (a) Provide a complete one- line diagram including feeder conduit, conductor sizes, quantity and types for the new panel 'LDP', and the service secondary's to be replaced per Keynote #14, Plan Sheet E1.1. (b) Provide a complete panel schedule for the new panel 'LDP', include load calc's. (c) Verify that the OCPD for the new panel 'LDP' is not oversized per NEC 408.36. (d) Please submit a selective coordination study summery by the electrical engineer of record for all of the circuit paths required to be selectively coordinated per NEC articles, 517, 700. (e) Provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for the interior lighting. Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. |