Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM03008
Parcel: 12105004A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL

Permit Number - T16CM03008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/03/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
05/06/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide an automatic faucet for the lavatories (L-1), dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucet will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.
2. If the shower does not have a pre-fabricated receptor, provide details to show that the construction of the receptor complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012.
3. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, safety pan, and valves. Reference: Sections 503, 504, 606.1, and 607.3, IPC 2012.
4. Show the size and route of the T&P relief pipes from the water heaters. Reference: Section 504, IPC 2012.
5. The existing 4" horizontal drains no longer appear to have any appropriately-sized clean outs. Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains; the cleanouts shall be sized per Section 708.7, IPC 2012 and shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.1 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
6. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for the two irrigation outlets. Reference: Sections 608.1 and 608.3, IPC 2012.
7. Verify the developed pipe lengths: include the vertical distances. Reference: Section402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012.
8. Revise the size of the natural gas pipe serving AC-1 and AC-2 (1" pipe @250' is limited to 119 CFH) per Table 402.4 (2). Reference: Section 402.4, IFGC 2012.
05/06/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Verify the available water pressure at the site with Tucson Water. If the water pressure is in excess of 80 PSI, provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 or CSA B356 to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2012.
05/09/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans (EF-1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14) so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope (e.g. the new glazing) based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3, IECC 2012 (e.g. provide the mechanical code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
05/18/2016 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
05/18/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET G002; BUILDING CODE REVIEW (BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS): THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IS INDICATED TO BE 50 FEET PER THE IBC TABLE 503. THIS IS THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT FOR A VA (PROTECTED) CONSTRUCTION TYPE. IN THIS CASE (VB), THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT IS 40 FEET. THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT COULD BE INCREASED PER THE IBC SECTION 504. PLEASE REVISE.
2. SHEET G002; BUILDING CODE REVIEW (BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS): THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA IS INDICATED TO BE 18,000 SF PER THE IBC TABLE 503. THIS IS THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR A VA (PROTECTED) CONSTRUCTION TYPE. IN THIS CASE (VB), THE ALLOWABLE AREA IS 9000 SF. THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA COULD BE INCREASED PER THE IBC SECTION 506. PLEASE REVISE.
3. SHEET G002; BUILDING CODE REVIEW (ACCESSIBILITY): PLEASE REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY REFERENCE TO THE IBC CHAPTER 11 AND THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1.
4. SHEET G002; EGRESS PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1016.3, THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE MUST BE MEASURED ALONG HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL EGRESS PATHS (NO DIAGONAL). PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN.
5. SHEET G003; ACCESSIBLE SHOWER: IS THERE AN ACCESSIBLE SHOWER LOCATED ON THIS PLAN? PLEASE REMOVE IF NOT ON THIS PROJECT.
6. SHEET G004: THESE WALL TYPES ARE LOCATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A101. PLEASE REFERENCE SHEET A101 ON SHEET G004.
7. SHEET S1.1 (UPPER ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE CANOPY BEAM SHOULD BE A HSS10X4X3/8 OR A HSS10X6X3/8. THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES A HSS8X4X3/8, WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE CALCULATION REQUIREMENT. PLEASE VERIFY.
8. SHEET S1.1; LOWER ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL 101 IS CUT ON THIS PLAN. PLEASE REVISE.
9. SHEET A101; PARTITION TYPES: SHOULD ONE OF THE TYPE 3 WALLS BE DENOTED AS 3a? THE PLAN INDICATES A 3a PARTITION AT THE NORTH WALL OF THE EXISTING VACANT SPACE.
10. SHEET A101; PARTITION TYPES: PARTITION TYPE 6 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THIS PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY.
11. SHEET A101; PARTITION TYPES: TYPE 3 AND TYPE 6 PARTITIONS HAVE A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING INDICATED. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS IF THESE ARE FIRE WALLS (SECTION 706), FIRE BARRIERS (SECTION 707), OR FIRE PARTITIONS (SECTION 708). IN ADDITION, PLEASE PROVIDE AN ANALYSIS AND SPECIFIC IBC SECTION ON THE DRAWINGS AS TO THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTITIONS.
12. SHEET A104; KEYNOTES: NOTE A49 INDICATES A NEW ROOF TOP UNIT. PLEASE ADD THAT NOTE TO ALL NEW UNITS INDICATED ON THE ROOF PLAN.
13. SHEET A104: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY THE EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE CAN ADEQUATELY SUPPORT THE ADDITIONAL ROOF TOP UNIT WEIGHTS.
14. SHEET A201; ELEVATIONS 5, 6, 7, AND 8: PLEASE VERIFY THE TITLES OF THESE ELEVATIONS ARE CORRECT. THEY DON'T APPEAR TO MATCH THE PLAN ON SHEET A101.
15. SHEET A501; DETAIL 8: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS DETAIL THE DIAGONAL BRACING SIZE, AND THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF BRACING CONNECTORS TO THE TOP OF THE PARTITION AND TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. ADDITIONAL DETAILS MAY BE REQUIRED.
16. SHEET A604: SEVERAL ELEVATIONS HAVE SECTION CUTS THAT ARE INCOMPLETE. PLEASE REVISE.
17. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
05/19/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1.Provide full compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code for exterior lighting.
#2. Provide full compliance with the 2012 IECC for lighting.
#3. Provide conduit, conductor sizes and types as well as quantities for the service lateral feeders.
Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2012 IECC, Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code, 2011 NEC.
05/20/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dyson Medical Center
T16CM03008
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 20, 2016

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Until development package DP16-0068 is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans

3. Sheet AS101 either needs to be the approved development package, or stamped for reference only or removed from this set.

4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
05/25/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved The Development Package must be approved first. Then these plans will be compared to the approved DP.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/07/2016 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed