Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - - 1ST
Permit Number - T16CM02898
Review Name: REVISION - - 1ST
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/05/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T16CM02898 Detached Garage Addition (1st Review of revised plans) 521 S. Russell Avenue Zoning - HC3 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 5, 2017 DUE DATE: July 17, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the proposed garage addition but cannot approve the plans without approval of a variance through the Board of Adjustment process. In addition to a B of A variance review and approval through the HPZ process is also required. 2. COMMENT: Revise the lot coverage calculations to include the new lot coverage percentage. 3. COMMENT: Per UDC section 6.4.5.C.1.a Established Areas a. Within established areas, the minimum required front street perimeter yard is 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 90 feet. The proposed enclosed detached garage structure is depicted on the site plan at two feet from the street property line. The required building setback of 20 feet or one and one-half the height of the building wall facing the street property line has not been met and requires approval through the Design Development Option is required. Based on the overall parapet height of 15'-4" from design grade, the required building setback from the street property line is 23 feet. The owner is proposing 2 feet from the street property line. The building setback to the north side of the property is depicted on the site plan at 0 feet. Typically a signature and statement from the adjacent property owner is required to allow the interior building setback reduction. The top of the parapet wall adjacent to the north property line is 13'-4" from design grade. The required building setback is the greatest of 6 feet or 2/3 the height of the wall facing the north property line. The required setback should be 8'-10". The owner is proposing zero feet from the property line. Because the property is zoned HC-3 (Historic), the building setbacks could be waived per the Historic Preservation Zone Review process and the DDO may not be required. Contact Michael Taku 837-4963 or Jonathan Mabry at 837-6968 for more information on the HPZ application and process. 4. Comment: Resubmit the building plans along with any Documents related tot eh a DDO or HPZ review and approval process. List as a note the DDO or HPZ case number, date of approval, and any conditions of the approval. Incorporate in the drawings the approval conditions where applicable. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans, DDO or HPZ approval memos. |
07/11/2017 | KEN VAN KARSEN | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T16CM02898 R1 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Plan review for the above referenced structure has been completed. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, please provide two sets of updated plans and calculations with a written response to each of the notated items indicating action taken. Do not cloud the changes made for comment revisions. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this plan review covers architectural, plumbing, mechanical, energy conservation and electrical. All code references are to the 2012 International Residential Code and 2012 International Energy Conservation Code. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. Limit all code references to those recognized by the City of Tucson. Adopted 2012 codes are listed at the Planning & Development Services web site. Update the outdated code references on sheet 8. SITE PLAN: 1. Indicate the location of buildings, utility meters and gas, water, electric and sewer lines from property line to building, R106.1.1. SECTIONS - DETAILS: 1. Provide consistent information for the unvented roof assembly, R806. Remove the eave vent notation from Detail #6/4. 2. An unvented roof assembly requires an air-impermeable rigid insulation material with a minimum R-5 value applied correctly to either side of the roof sheathing (closed cell spray or rigid board tight to the roof sheathing), R806.5. This condensation control provision is necessary for code compliance, and may be a single layer of air-impermeable insulation, or layered with batt insulation for achieving the total required roof R-value. PLUMBING PLANS: 1. Show hot water pipe with minimum R-3 insulation, N1103.4.2. MECHANICAL PLANS: 1. Provide demand calculations in accordance with Manual J/S/D standards, M1401.3, M1601.1. Systems shall be sized in accordance with Manual S based on building loads calculated in accordance with Manual J and duct systems sized in accordance with Manual D. Notate if the mechanical system calculations may be provided by deferred submittal. The deferred calculations must be approved through revision process prior to mechanical inspections. ELECTRICAL PLANS: 1. Provide notation requiring tamper resistant receptacles for 125 volt, 15A and 20A receptacles, R4002.14. If you have any questions please contact: Ken Van Karsen (520) 837-4912 City of Tucson Residential Plan Review |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
09/15/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |