Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T16CM02891
Parcel: 10819019H

Address:
735 E WETMORE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T16CM02891
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/27/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change The shell drawings indicate that a 1-1/2" water meter is being installed with a 2" water service to the building but the water calculations on sheet P401 "anticipates" a 2" water meter: coordinate. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
06/27/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A revision to the shell activity is required to reflect the changes to the roof construction; coordinate the envelope analysis with the roof changes. [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (i.e. unless the roof construction has been modified as part of this activity, there is no continuous insulation on the roof). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
2. Coordinate with the fenestration submittal. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC - certified documentation for the fenestration components (for the U-factor and the SHGC values) or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012 (see also footnote c on the envelope compliance certificate).]
3. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the kitchen hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC
4. The submitted brochure does not indicate that the ovens are listed to UL 710B. [Initial comment: The four rapid cook ovens (K10) are not listed under UL 710B; provide a justification for not installing these appliances under Type I hoods. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.2.1, IMC 2012.]
06/27/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide full compliance with the Tucson / Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.
#2. Designate type and include in the luminaire schedule all exterior lighting shown on plan sheet E-201.
#3. Provide designation type, and include spec's in the luminaire schedule, include in the Outdoor Lighting calc's, for the LED accent lighting on the roof.
Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC.
06/27/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the waste and vent isometric to show all of the direct drain connections. [Initial comment: Provide waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.]
06/30/2016 CLAYTON TREVILLYAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
07/06/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
07/14/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Approved