Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM02572
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/18/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 1122 S. 6th Avenue - Take-Out Kitchen T16CM02572 Building Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 18, 2017 DUE DATE: January 04, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan for compliance to development package DP16-0063 but until the development package has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plan. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/23/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/01/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Second comment: Provide fixture descriptions that are complete enough to allow the listing information of the fixtures to be checked.] [Initial comment: Provide fixture descriptions for all plumbing fixtures. Reference: Section 402, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. With regard to the combustion air note in the equipment description, Section 704, IMC 2012 does not exist; see Sections 304.1 through 304.12, IFGC 2012. [Second comment: The specified model number of the water heater could not be found on the manufacturer's web site; provide a copy of the manufacture's specifications and installation instructions for the proposed water heater.] [Initial comment: Provide the specifications and listing information for the proposed water heater. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 501.5, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 3. Provide a cleanout within 12" of the right-of-way (see Pima County Wastewater standard detail RWRD 401). [Second comment: No cleanouts are shown for the building sewer past the 2-way cleanout where the building drain joins the building sewer. Cleanouts are required at least every 100-feet and at the right-of-way.] [Initial comment: Show the location of all cleanouts for the building sewer; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2012.] 4. A mop sink in a kitchen is required to discharge to a grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. [Second comment: The mop sink may not be indirectly wasted; it must be directly-connected and have a trap and vent.] [Initial comment: Show that each trap and trapped fixture has been vented in accordance with one of the methods shown in the IPC. Reference: Section 901.2.1, IPC 2012.] 5. A scupper is a weir, not a horizontal pipe and Table 1106.3, IPC 2012 is not applicable. Provide overflow protection for the roof. [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108, IPC 2012.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Show that the termination of the gravity vent for the gas-fired water heater complies with the requirements of Section 503.6.4 (1), IFGC 2012.] |
| 02/02/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Second comment: Comment not addressed.] [Initial comment: Show how the requirements of Section C406, IECC 2012 (Additional Efficiency Package Options) are to be fulfilled. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.] 2. Both MU-1 and EC-1 are within 10-feet of the discharge of exhaust fan EF-2. [Second comment: Verify that the evaporative coolers (MU-1 and EC-1) comply with Section 401.4 (3), IMC 2012 by being located a minimum of 3-feet below the outlet of EF-1 and EF-2 or 10-feet horizontally from the exhaust outlets. (See also detail 1/sheet 8 for clearance information.)] [Initial comment: Provide operating and maintenance access space for the rooftop equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 306.1, IMC 2012.] 3. The drain for the evaporative cooler EC-1 may not terminate over a roof drain that terminates over a non-absorbent surface (i.e. a sidewalk).] [Second comment: Drain information was not found on the drawings.] [Initial comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the evaporative cooler drains. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.] 4. No calculations found in this submittal. [Second comment: No calculations found in this submittal.] [Initial comment: Provide sufficient heat for the building to maintain a minimum temperature of 68 F on a design heating day (32 F). Provide heating load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections 309.1 and 312.1, IMC 2012 and Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012.] 5. No calculations found in this submittal. [Second comment: No calculations found in this submittal.] [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 02/02/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/07/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 02/07/2017 | LBOJORQ1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |