Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM02480
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4: A NORTH ARROW WAS NOT INDICATED ON SHEET G-004. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: PLEASE INDICATE IN THE FIRE RESISTANCE TABLES ON SHEETS G-002 AND G-003 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 407.2.1 AND 407.2.2 ARE MET. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: PLEASE INDICATE IN THE FIRE RESISTANCE TABLES ON SHEETS G-002 AND G-003 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 710.4, 710.5, 710.6, 710.7, AND 710.8 ARE MET. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: THE ADA REFERENCE IN THE CODE INFORMATION ON SHEET G-003 WAS NOT REMOVED AND REPLACED BY THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1. 5. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 07/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 120 GPM. The calculations shown on sheet P903 show a demand of 145 GPM which will require the installation of a 3" water meter. [Initial comment: Provide the calculations used to determine the total demand that the 2" water meter will be serving. Include all fixtures when calculating the total demand. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2012.] |
| 07/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Complete the waste and vent isometric: the drawing shows numerous fixtures or fittings not connected to any pipes and numerous discontinuous pipes. Revise the design of the combination waste and vent systems located in B104 and B126 to eliminate the dry vents that appears to be offsetting horizontally prior to rising 6" above the floor rim of the highest fixture being vented (Section 915.2.2, IPC 2012). [Initial comment: Complete the plumbing plans and the waste and vent isometrics. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is allowed to be used at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide cleanouts for all horizontal drains; the cleanouts shall not be located greater than 100-feet apart, measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. Reference: Section 708.3.1, IPC 2012.] 3. The revised detail (11/P501) clearly shows the drains from the three compartments being connected together and not running independently to the floor sink. In addition, the detail shows the installation of a flow control device which only serves as an obstruction when installed in a grease waste system connected to a gravity grease interceptor. [Initial comment: Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012.] 4. Based on the architectural building sections, the main roof is surrounded by parapets and there are no gutters except for the shade canopies. While General Note A on sheet AR101 calls for all water to flow towards roof drains, the intent appears to utilize scuppers through the parapet to drain the water. No dimensions are provided for the scuppers and it appears that no provision has been made for overflow protection. Provide hydraulic calculations for the scuppers; show the effective roof area served by each scupper and show how overflow protection is to be provided. Provide the dimensions of the gutters and downspouts for the canopies. [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.] 5. Coordinate the gas piping riser diagram with the mechanical plan (i.e. include the gas load from make-up air unit, MAU-1). Verify the connected load from the residential-size dryer in room B124; a connected load of 1CFH is questionable. [Initial comment: Provide a complete diagram of the natural gas distribution system showing the all of the loads, developed lengths, and the layout of the distribution piping. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 6. The rim elevation (2485.57') of the next upstream sanitary manhole from the building sewer with the gravity grease interceptor is higher than the first floor elevation (2485.30'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. The basis for the water pressure calculations on sheet P903 is a static pressure in excess of 80 PSI (Tucson Water indicates that the pressure range for that address is 88 to 95 PSI). Provide a water pressure regulator conforming to ASSE 1003 or CSA B356 to limit the water pressure to 80 PSI or less. Evaluate the pipe sizing using the incoming water pressure after the water pressure regulator. Reference: Section 604.8, IPC 2012. |
| 07/05/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Will wait until Building Review Comments are satisfied prior to approving. |
| 07/06/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide the day, month, and year of the expiration of current registration for the seal on the food service drawings. Reference: Section R4-30-304 of the Rules of the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration.] 2. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) on COMcheck or use the appropriate default SHGC from Table C303.1.3 (2), IECC 2012. Coordinate the SHGC values shown on the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate with the window descriptions shown on the drawings. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show how the requirements of Section C406, IECC 2012 (Additional Efficiency Package Options) are to be fulfilled. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show that the proposed HVAC system meets the requirements of Sections C403.2, C403.3 (e.g. provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification from COMcheck). Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 6. The revised ventilation calculations do not appear to be consistent with the requirements of Section 403, IMC 2012. Show how the required ventilation amounts were calculated for each room. [Initial comment: Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation using the current code. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] 7. Verify the manufacturer's make-up air requirement for the commercial dryers being installed; the literature indicates a minimum clear opening area of 250 square inches is required for each dryer. [Initial comment: Verify that the commercial dryers have adequate makeup air per the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Sections 304.1 and 504.5, IMC 2012.] 8. Section 504.5, IMC 2012 requires a minimum clear area of 100 square inches for dryer makeup air. [Initial comment: Show how the dryer installation in room B105 complies with Section 504.5, IMC 2012.] |
| 07/06/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/14/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. The added plan sheet E502 is not legible (Bad Print). Also minimum font size for lettering is 3/32", per City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. |
| 07/20/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Mainstreet T16CM02480 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The development packages sheets provided in the building plans will either need to be the approved development package sheets or marked as reference or removed from the building plans. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |