Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM02164
Parcel: 128090020

Review Status: Active

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T16CM02164
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/29/2016 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/11/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show how the roof drainage (including overflow drainage) over the former Anna's Linens suite is being accomplished. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
2. Clarify the modifications to the roof drainage for the north section of the former Ace Hardware suite. Show how overflow drainage is to be provided. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
04/11/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Thermostats that are new or are being relocated shall include off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
4. Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.
04/11/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
04/12/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Bealls Outlet
T16CM02164
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 12, 2016

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans have been reviewed an although the proposed façade changes and interior remodel meet the Unified Development Code requirements Zoning will not approve until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the plans.

3. Once all PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review..

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
04/14/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for interior lighting.
04/21/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET A-1; MEANS OF EGRESS REQUIREMENTS: THE TABLE INDICATES A 75' MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE, THEN INDICATES THE PROPOSED TRAVEL DISTANCE IS 100' OR LESS. THIS EXCEEDS THE ALLOWABLE DISTANCE. PLEASE VERIFY. SEE THE IBC SECTION 202 FOR THE DEFINITION OF THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL.
2. SHEET A-1; TRAVEL DISTANCE: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1016.1 FOR THE TRAVEL DISTANCE LIMIT. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE REFERENCE.
3. SHEET A-1; NUMBER OF EXITS: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1021.1 FOR THE NUMBER OF EXITS. THERE IS NO TABLE 1021.1. PLEASE REMOVE THE TABLE REFERENCE.
4. SHEET A-1; EGRESS WIDTH: REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1005.1 FOR THE EGRESS WIDTH. THERE IS NO TABLE 1005.1. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE TO SECTION 1005.1.
5. SHEET A-1; CODE DATA: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE INCLUDES THE 2010 ADA STANDARDS. PLEASE REMOVE THAT REFERENCE.
6. SHEET A-1; BUILDING DATA: USING TABLE 503 OF THE IBC AND SECTION 506.3, INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA.
7. SHEET A-1; PLUMBING FIXTURE DATA: PLEASE INCLUDE THE SERVICE SINK IN THIS FIXTURE TABLE.
8. SHEET A-2; FLOOR PLAN: THIS PLAN INDICATES EXISTING INTERIOR BLOCK WALLS (BETWEEN FORMER ANNA'S AND FORMER ACE HARDWARE) ARE TO BE REMOVED. WERE THESE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED WALLS, ROOF SUPPORT WALLS, OR STRUCTURAL SHEAR WALLS? PLEASE RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE ISSUES RELATED TO THE REMOVAL OF THOSE WALLS.
9. SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE SECTION 1.
10. SHEET A-4; DETAIL 1: A NOTE INDICATES A PRECAST CONCRETE LINTEL. IT WOULD MOST LIKELY BE A MASONRY LINTEL. IS THIS A NEW LINTEL OVER A NEW OPENING? PLEASE VERIFY.
11. SHEET A-4; FLOOR PLAN: WHERE THE TWO BLOCK WALLS HAVE BEEN REMOVED, FOUR COLUMNS ARE INDICATED. THE WALL PARTITION LEGEND INDICATES THESE ARE EXISTING SUPPORT STRUCTURES. WERE THESE IN THE EXISTING BLOCK WALLS? ARE THERE EXISTING SUPPORT BEAMS THAT CONNECT TO THESE MEMBERS? HOW WAS THE EXISTING ROOF SUPPORTED HERE? ARE THERE EXISTING FOOTINGS LOCATED AT THE SUPPORT STRUCTURES? PLEASE VERIFY.
12. SHEET A-4; FLOOR PLAN: ALONG THE INTERIOR DIMENSION LINE AT THE REMOVED BLOCK WALLS, PLEASE REVISE THE TWO END DIMENSIONS (FROM SUPPORT STRUCTURES TO BLOCK WALL).
13. SHEET A-5: SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN DETAILS.
14. SHEET A-8; EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A AND B: PLEASE INDICATE THESE ELEVATIONS ARE THE NORTH WALL.
15. SHEET A-8; EXISTING FLOOR PLAN 1: ALONG THE DIMENSION LINE AT THE EXISTING STOREFRONT, PLEASE REVISE A DIMENSION.
16. SHEET A-8.2: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW FRAMING INDICATED IN 1/A-8.2 AND A/A-8.2.
17. SHEET A-8.2: SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
18. SHEET A-8.2; EXTERIOR ELEVATION B: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW WALL FRAMING.
19. SHEETS A-8.3, A-8.4, A-8.5, AND A-8.6: A BOXED NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE SHEET INDICATES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT STRUCTURAL STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE ENGINEER'S REVIEW, AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. AS INDICATED IN PREVIOUS NOTES, A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IN ARIZONA SHALL DESIGN ALL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AS REQUIRED. SHOP DRAWINGS (DEFERRED SUBMITTAL) SHALL BE HANDLED PER THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4 (REVIEWED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, WHO SHALL REVIEW THOSE DRAWINGS AND ADD NOTATION THAT ALL ITEMS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE BUILDING DESIGN), THEN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. REMOVE THIS BOXED NOTE AS CURRENTLY SHOWN.
20. SHEET A-8.3; WALL SECTION 1: A NOTE AT THE EXISTING ROOF INDICATES THE NEW STUDS MUST BE CONNECTED TO THE ROOF SHEATHING, WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE DETAIL. THE LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD MUST DESIGN THIS CONNECTION AND INDICATE THAT DESIGN ON THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS.
21. SHEET A-8.4: SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
22. SHEET A-8.5: THIS SHEET WOULD INDICATE THE BEAMS, COLUMN, FOOTINGS, AND BRACING ARE NEW WHERE THE TWO BLOCK WALLS ARE REMOVED, AND WILL REQUIRE A LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR THE VERTICAL AND LATERAL DESIGN.
23. SHEET A-8.5: SHEET A-2.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
24. SHEET A-8.5: A BOXED NOTE ABOVE PLAN 1 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER WILL CONFIRM THE SOIL BEARING. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT A SOILS INVESTIGATION REPORT, OR PRESUMPTIVE LOAD BEARING VALUES (IBC TABLE 1806.2) MAY BE USED (1500 PSF AT 18" BELOW FINISH GRADE, OR 1000 PSF AT 12" BELOW FINISH GRADE). INDICATE ON THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS.
25. SHEETS A-9 AND A-9.1: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE HEIGHT, LENGTH, AND APPROACH OF THE SALES COUNTERS. DO THESE MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1 SECTION 904?
26. SHEET A-10; ENLARGED PLAN 1-A: INDICATE ON THIS PLAN THE RESTROOM DOORS DO NOT REDUCE THE REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH OF THE HALL BY MORE THAN HALF PER THE IBC SECTION 1005.7.1.
27. SHEET A-10; ENLARGED PLAN 1-B: THESE RESTROOMS DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 604, THEREFORE MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE. SINCE THEY ARE EXISTING, THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE PER THE IBC SECTION 3411.7. HOWEVER, EXCEPTION 1 IN THAT SECTION INDICATES A MAXIMUM OF 20% OF THE ALTERATION COSTS SHOULD GO TO ACCESSIBILITY. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS THE ACCESSIBILITY COSTS ADDED.
28. SHEET A-14; CEILING LEGEND: PLEASE INDICATE THE EXIT LIGHT LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN, OR REFERENCE THE ELECTRICAL SHEETS OR SHEET LS-1.
29. SHEET A-15: DOES THIS PROJECT INCLUDE ALL OF THESE ASSEMBLIES? PLEASE INDICATE ON SHEET A-6 EACH U.L. LISTED ASSEMBLY WITH EACH WALL.
30. SHEET LS-1; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL IS LIMITED TO 75' PER THE IBC TABLE 1014.3. PLEASE REVISE AND REVIEW THE PROPOSED DISTANCE.
31. SHEET LS-1; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: THE DEAD END LIMIT IS 50' PER THE IBC SECTION 1018.4(2). PLEASE REVISE.
32. SHEET LS-1; MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE: PLEASE COORDINATE THIS TABLE WITH SHEET A-1.
33. GENERAL: PLEASE INCLUDE A NEW ROOF PLAN IN THE DRAWINGS AND INDICATE ANY NEW UNITS/LOADS ON THE ROOF.
34. GENERAL: ALL NOTES ON ALL SHEETS INDICATING WELDED CONNECTIONS MUST DISPLAY THE WELD TYPE, SIZE, AND LENGTH.
35. GENERAL: PLEASE INCLUDE MATERIAL STRENGTHS (BEAMS, COLUMNS, MASONRY, CONCRETE, REINFORCING, WELDS, SOIL BEARING, ETC.) ON THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS THAT ARE ADDITIONAL TO THE BOXED NOTE ON SHEET A-8.5.
36. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/23/2016 ANY REJECT SHELF RECEIVED