Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM02027
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |
| 06/15/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/17/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 1; SHEET G002; CODE ANALYSIS (PLUMBING FACILITIES): THE REFERENCE ON SHEET G002 (PLUMBING FACILITIES) TO THE IBC SECTION 2902.1 SHOULD BE SHOWN CORRECTLY AS SECTION 2902.1.1 (EXCEPTION). IN ADDITION, THE PREVIOUS COMMENT CLEARLY STATED THE ARCHITECT MUST INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS VERIFYING THE WEIGHTED DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES AS IT RELATES TO THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 4; SHEETS S0.1 THROUGH S4.2: THESE SHEETS MUST BE STAMPED WITH AN ARIZONA REGISTRANT'S SEAL. SHEET S0.1 IS STILL STAMPED BY A LICENSED NORTH DAKOTA ENGINEER. IN ADDITION, PLEASE INCLUDE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE REGISTRANT'S ARIZONA LICENSE BELOW THE SEAL ON EACH SHEET. 3. NEW COMMENT: ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS MUST BE SEALED, SIGNED, AND DATED BY THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL. PLEASE INCLUDE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THE REGISTRANT'S ARIZONA LICENSE BELOW THE SEAL ON EACH SHEET. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6; GENERAL; GEM SHEETS G0.00 THROUGH D3.2: PER THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4, THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL REVIEW AND COORDINATE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY OTHERS. PLEASE FOLLOW THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 TO INDICATE ON THESE DRAWINGS THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE HAS REVIEWED THESE DOCUMENTS AND FOUND THEM TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN. IF WE ARE TO REVIEW THESE DRAWINGS UNDER THIS ACTIVITY NUMBER, THESE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON THE NEXT SUBMITTAL. 5. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/20/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Old Dominion T16CM02027 Building Plan (3rd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 20, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP16-0046 is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 06/21/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/21/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |