Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM02027
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved: the seal is still illegible on the drawings. [Initial comment: Provide a seal by an Arizona Registrant on the plumbing plans that is legible. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.] 2. Show the size and route of the hot water return piping on the plumbing plans. [Initial comment: The developed length of the hot water supply piping appears to be greater than fifty feet; provide a method for maintaining the temperature of the hot water supply system. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012.] 3. Detail 4/PP501 was revised to show the installation of a hot water recirculation system but a nearly identical version of the detail (7/MH501) shows no hot water recirculation system. [Initial comment: Revise the detail of the water heater installation to include hot water recirculation. Reference: Sections 503 and 607.2, IPC 2012.] 4. A revised version of sheet PP001 was not included in this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide cleanouts sized for the nominal size of pipes that they serve up to 4-inches. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012.] 5. A revised version of sheet PP001 was not included in this submittal. [Initial comment: Show the slope of the horizontal rainwater pipes on the plans. Reference: Section 1106.3, IPC 2012.] |
| 05/03/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not yet resolved: the civil utility plan needs to be updated to indicate the actual location of the reduced pressure backflow assemblies. [Initial comment: Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water (typically installed directly after the water meter, outside of the building). Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] |
| 05/04/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Amend the glazing notes on sheet A703 to require that the maximum U-factor and the maximum SHGC for the windows as shown on the Envelope Compliance Certificate shall be NFRC-certified. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values for the fenestration products shown on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3.(3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 2. The calculations were not included in this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 3. The calculations were not included in this submittal. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show how ventilation will be provided for the occupied spaces. Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 05/11/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5; SHEET G002; CODE ANALYSIS (PLUMBING FACILITIES): THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR WATER CLOSETS IS LISTED AS 3 MEN AND 3 WOMEN, WHILE THE ACTUAL COUNT INDICATES 4 MEN AND 2 WOMEN. PLEASE VERIFY WHY THE CODE REQUIREMENT IS NOT MET. THE IBC SECTION 2902.1.1 (EXCEPTION) ALLOWS A WEIGHTED DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES WHERE APPROVED STATISTICAL DATA INDICATES SUCH. THIS WOULD REQUIRE A STATEMENT ON THE DRAWINGS BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, CITING AN OWNER STATEMENT THAT SUCH A DISTRIBUTION OF THE SEXES IS THE NORM IN THIS FACILITY. PLEASE INCLUDE A LETTER FROM THE OLD DOMINION FREIGHT PRESIDENT ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE, AND INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS BY THE ARCHITECT, AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8; SHEET A205; KEYNOTES: NOTE FP09 REFERENCES DETAIL 10/A404 FOR THE ROOF ACCESS LADDER. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE. THE REFERENCE IN NOTE FP09 WAS NOT REVISED. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18; SHEET S2.1; ELEVATION 1: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE ON THIS ELEVATION FOR THE MASONRY LINTEL SCHEDULE. NO REFERENCE WAS LOCATED. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 20; SHEETS S0.1 THROUGH S4.2: THESE SHEETS MUST BE STAMPED WITH AN ARIZONA REGISTRANT'S SEAL. THESE SHEETS ARE STILL STAMPED BY A LICENSED NORTH DAKOTA ENGINEER. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 21; GENERAL (STRUCTURAL): THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE ALL SHEETS AS REQUIRED. SHEETS S0.2, S0.3, S2.1, S3.1, 23.2, AND S3.3 DO NOT MEET THIS CRITERIA. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 24; GENERAL; GEM SHEETS G0.00 THROUGH D3.2: PER THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4, THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL REVIEW AND COORDINATE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY OTHERS. PLEASE FOLLOW THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1 TO INDICATE ON THESE DRAWINGS THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE HAS REVIEWED THESE DOCUMENTS AND FOUND THEM TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN. IF WE ARE TO REVIEW THESE DRAWINGS UNDER THIS ACTIVITY NUMBER, THESE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET ON THE NEXT SUBMITTAL. 7. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/16/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Old Dominion T16CM02027 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 17, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP16-0046 is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/19/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package DP16-0046 must be approved first. |