City of Tucson

Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T16CM01597

Parcel: 138244040

Address:

1785 W VALENCIA RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T16CM01597

Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Review Status: Completed

Search:

Review Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description	Status	Comments
03/16/2016	KEN BROUILLETTE	FIRE	REVIEW	Approved
03/29/2016	ROBERT SHERRY	PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Completed
03/29/2016	ROBERT SHERRY	MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Reqs Change	1. Show how the heating and cooling loads for "spaces 1, 2, and 3" are related to the building shell. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Revise the Building Section General Notes on sheet A4.0 to require the storefront window system to have a MAXIMUM U-value of 0.50 and the SHGC to have a MAXIMUM value of 0.25 as noted in the Envelope Compliance Certification. In addition, the storefront shall be NFRC-certified. Reference: Sections C303.1.3 and C402.3, IECC 2012.
03/29/2016	ROBERT SHERRY	WATER	REVIEW	Completed
03/29/2016	ERIC NEWCOMB	BUILDING-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Reqs Change	1. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: ON THE WEST END OF THIS NEW SHELL BUILDING, KEYNOTE 3 INDICATES AN EXISTING WALL. IF A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EITHER THE EXISTING EAST WALL AND/OR THE NEW WEST WALL PER THE IBC TABLES 601 OR 602, PLEASE INDICATE THAT ON THE DRAWINGS. IF THE NEW BUILDING AND EXISTING BUILDING MEET THE COMBINED AREA REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 508.4.2 FOR SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES, NO SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. IF THE BUILDINGS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 508.3 FOR NON-SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES, NO SEPARATION IS REQUIRED. PLEASE CLARIFY. 2. SHEET A1.0; DETAIL 1: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE. THIS IS NOT A PARAPET. 3. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 8 INDICATES A 4"X4" TUBE SIDEWALK DRAIN, WHILE DETAIL 2 ON THIS SHEET INDICATES A 6"X6" TUBE. PLEASE COORDINATE. 4. SHEET A3.0; EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 9 INDICATES A 4"X4" TUBE SIDEWALK DRAIN, WHILE DETAIL 2/A1.0 INDICATES A 6"X6" TUBE. PLEASE COORDINATE. 5. SHEET A3.0; EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 9 REFERENCES SHEET A1.1. PLEASE REVISE. 6. SHEET A3.0; EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 20 REFERENCES DETAIL 4/A5.0 FOR THE ROOF ACCESS LADDER. PLEASE REVISE. 7. SHEET A4.0; BUILDING SECTION 1: PLEASE FINISH THE TWO DETAIL REFERENCES ON GRIDS 3 AND 4 (AT THE EXTERIOR CEILING). 8. SHEET A4.0; WALL SECTIONS 2 AND 3: THREE FLOOR DETAILS REFERENCE SHEET S3.2. PLEASE REVISE. 9. SHEET A4.0; BUILDING SECTION 1 AND WALL SECTIONS 2 AND 3: THREE PARAPET DETAILS REFERENCE 3/A5.0. PLEASE REVISE. 10. SHEET A4.0; WALL SECTIONS 2 AND 3: TWO DETAILS REFERENCE 3/A5.0 AT THE WALL ABOVE THE ROOF LINE. PLEASE VERIFY. 11. SHEET A4.0; BUILDING SECTION 1 AND WALL SECTION 2: KEYNOTE 11 INDICATES A GLULAM WOOD BEAM IN FOUR LOCATIONS, WHILE THE SHEET S2.0 INDICATES STEEL TUBES. PLEASE COORDINATE. 12. SHEET A5.0; ROOF PLAN: DETAIL 5/A6.0 IS CUT AT THE NORTH WALL. PLEASE REVISE. 13. SHEET S2.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE ADD A SECOND PLAN ON THE DRAWINGS TO INDICATE THE FLOOR FRAMING ONLY (SHOW IT SEPARATELY FROM THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN. THE FLOOR FRAMING ON THE EAST WALL IS NOT INDICATED. 14. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 3 AND 7: A FLOOR LIVE LOAD OF 40 PSF IS INDICATED FOR THE SPACE ABOVE THE SIDEWALK CEILING AND BELOW THE ROOF. WHAT IS THIS AREA TO BE USED FOR (CATWALKS)? PLEASE CLARIFY. 15. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 10: SHOULD BEAM B-4 HAVE FLOOR LOAD ADDED TO THE DESIGN? PLEASE VERIFY. 16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 11: SHOULD BEAM B-5 HAVE FLOOR LOAD ADDED TO THE DESIGN? PLEASE VERIFY. 17. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEETS 13 THROUGH 17: PLEASE VERIFY THE FOUNDATION SIZES (FOR ADDED FLOOR LOADING). 18. GENERAL: THE NEW COVERED WALKWAY (NORTH AND EAST WALLS) VALUATION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE BUILDING VALUATION INDICATED AT THE TIME OF THE SUBMITTAL. THIS REVISES THE VALUATION. 19. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
03/30/2016	ERIC NEWCOMB	COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE	COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING	Passed
04/04/2016	STEVE SHIELDS	ZONING	REVIEW	Approved
04/05/2016	DAN SANTA CRUZ	ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL	REVIEW	Reqs Change	Please address the following electrical plan review comment. Also provide a written response. #1.Provide complete panel schedules for panels A, B, & C. Or Delete.
04/07/2016	CPIERCE1	ADA	REVIEW	Needs Review

Showing 1 to 9 of 9 entries

Previous1Next

Final Status

Task End Date	Reviewer's Name	Type of Review	Description
04/14/2016	ARUIZ1	OUT TO CUSTOMER	Completed