Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T16CM01533
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 160 S. Avenida Del Convento T16CM01533 Building Plan (5th Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed and it appears that the building plan match development package D05-0022. But until D05-0022 has been approved Zoning will not approve the building plans. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/18/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/18/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not addressed. [Second comment: The submitted civil drawing (DP-2) shows the southern building sewer connecting to a private sewer collection system without a manhole. An 8" sewer requires manholes to be installed at each change of direction which will include the connection to the existing private sewer. Revise the civil drawings to show the proper connection; show the rim elevation of the new manhole at the southern building sewer connection and the rim elevation of the existing private manhole at the connection of the northern building sewer. Determine the need for any backwater valves per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012.] [Initial comment: Verify that a manhole is provided within 200-feet of the connection of the building drain to the building sewer. Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012. Note: the installation of a manhole on private property will require submission of the plans to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality.] |
| 05/19/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The ducts for EF-1 are still called out as 6" on sheets M1.1, M1.2, M1.3, and M1.4. [Third comment: The maximum duct diameter that is allowed under the exception to Section 607.6.1, IMC 2012 is 4"; the 6" bathroom exhaust duct does not comply with the requirements. In addition, since the ceiling-mounted fan penetrates the membrane of the fire-rated floor/ceiling assembly, a listed ceiling radiation damper will be required for the fan.] [Second comment: Show how the penetration of the fire-rated horizontal assemblies by the dryer exhaust ducts and the bathroom exhaust ducts complies with the exception to Section 607.6.1, IMC 2012. Provide an architectural construction detail of the fire-rated shaft enclosing the garage exhaust.] [Initial comment: Explain how the required horizontal and vertical fire separations and the rated egress corridors are to be maintained with the proposed routing of the exhaust ducts (dryer, bathroom, EF-7, EF-8, and EF-9). Reference: Sections 708.3 and 711.3, IBC 2012.] |
| 05/23/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/24/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Please provide a letter indicating all changes that were made to all sheets. This will include the drawings, calculations, specifications, etc. In addition, please provide a reference set of the first drawings that were previously submitted for the initial review. |