Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM00857
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the water connection size for the proposed water closets. The water closets are specified as tank-type units but the connection size is scheduled as 1-1/4" (the urinal is also scheduled for a 1-1/4" connection). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Clarify the size of the existing CW supply to the new restrooms; the riser diagram on sheet P.2 shows it as being 1-1/4" whereas all of the other drawings call out an existing 1-1/2" CW line. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. What is the source of the hot/tempered water for rooms A103 and A104? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. The restroom in room A128 does not meet the requirements for a family restroom. See the building review comments. 5. Provide partitions in room A126 per Sections 405.3.4 and 405.3.5, IPC 2012. |
| 02/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify the location, serial number, and size of the existing water meter serving 821 E 47th Street; the location shown on sheet P.2 is that of the water meter serving 831 E 47th Street. 2. Show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings; indicate the size of the assembly. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf. |
| 02/09/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the alterations to the building envelope based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, and C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridor as a return air duct (see HP-4). Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012. 3. The scheduled ventilation air flow rate is much greater than the scheduled exhaust flow rate. How will the building be prevented from having excessive positive pressure? Reference: Section 403.1, IMC 2012. 4. Coordinate the balancing data for EF-2 with the scheduled capacity for EF-2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 02/25/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET C.1; CODE REVIEW: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWING THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE IS 300' PER THE IBC TABLE 1016.2. 2. SHEET C.1; CODE REVIEW: THE TWO UNISEX (FAMILY) TOILETS INDICATED ARE LOCATED IN A COMMON RESTROOM AND MAY NOT BE APPLIED TO BOTH MALES AND FEMALES AS SHOWN IN THE ANALYSIS. PLEASE REVISE THE ANALYSIS TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC TABLE 2902.1. 3. SHEET A.2; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.2.1.2, FAMILY TOILET ROOMS SHALL INCLUDE ONLY ONE WATER CLOSET AND ONE LAVATORY. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING TO MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. 4. SHEET A.2; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IPC SECTION 405.3.4, EACH WATER CLOSET SHALL OCCUPY A SEPARATE COMPARTMENT WITH WALLS OR PARTITIONS AND A DOOR ENCLOSING THE FIXTURE TO ENSURE PRIVACY. THE FAMILY RESTROOM (A128), WOMEN'S RESTROOM (A127), AND MEN'S RESTROOM (A126) DO NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. 5. SHEET A.2; FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IPC SECTION 405.3.5, EACH URINAL SHALL OCCUPY A SEPARATE AREA WITH WALLS OR PARTITIONS TO PROVIDE PRIVACY. THE MEN'S RESTROOM (A126) DOES NOT MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. 6. SHEET A.2; FLOOR PLAN: THERE IS NOT A CODE ISSUE HERE, BUT THE STORAGE ROOM (A129) AND FILE ROOM (A130) ARE ACCESSIBLE ONLY THROUGH THE JANITOR'S CLOSET. PLEASE VERIFY. 7. SHEET A.2; FLOOR PLAN: A SECTION 6/A.9 IS CUT THROUGH THE DESK IN THE RECEPTION AREA (A100). PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 904.3, A SERVICE COUNTER CAN BE UP TO 36" IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISH FLOOR, BUT MUST ALSO BE 36" MINIMUM IN LENGTH AT THE ACCESSIBLE AREA AND SHALL EXTEND THE SAME DEPTH AS THE COUNTERTOP. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION TO MEET THOSE REQUIREMENTS. 8. SHEET A.2; WALL TYPES SECTION: A NOTE AT THE TOP OF THE WALL INDICATES TO 'SECURE BRACE TO STRUCTURE ABOVE'. USE METAL STUDS, AND INDICATE THE STUD SIZE AND SPACING, AND THE CONNECTION OF THE STUD TO THE TOP OF THE WALL (INCLUDE CONNECTION SIZE AND QUANTITY). ADD A DETAIL TO THIS SHEET INDICATING THE CONNECTION OF THE METAL STUD BRACE TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE. 9. SHEET A.3; ENLARGED RESTROOM PLANS: PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 305, A MINIMUM CLEAR FLOOR SPACE OF 30" X 48" IS REQUIRED FOR ACCESSIBILITY. THE DOOR SWING IS NOT ALLOWED IN THAT CLEAR SPACE. PLEASE REVISE THE RESTROOM LAYOUTS TO MEET THAT REQUIREMENT. 10. SHEET A.10; SECTION 2: A DETAIL REFERENCE AT THE ACCESS HATCH INDICATES 1/A.12. PLEASE REVISE THAT SHEET REFERENCE. 11. SHEET S.1; FRAMING KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES TO SEE A TYPICAL DETAIL FOR FRAMING AT OPENINGS. IS THAT DETAIL ON THIS SET OF DRAWINGS? 12. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/26/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 03/02/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
| 03/04/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Aviva T16CM00857 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. As the proposed use is a change of use and the site does not have sufficient vehicle parking Zoning will need to use UDC Article 3.3.3.H (10835) to be able to approve the building plans. Zoning has attached a copy of a require affidavit and 2005 aerial photos. Have the affidavit signed and notarized and return the documents with your next submittal. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |