Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM00824
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code and presented using COMcheck Envelope Compliance (see M3.0 and E1.0 for examples). Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Revise the ventilation calculations using the appropriate occupancy classifications shown in Table 403.3, IMC 2012; for example, use "Retail: Sales" instead of "Correctional facilities: Booking/Waiting". The occupancy classification for "Food and beverage service: Kitchen (cooking)" in the 2012 IMC does not correspond to the values shown in your calculations. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012 and Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012. 3. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Use the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 4. Verify that the specified programmable thermostats are capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy as well as providing for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and start-up control. Reference: Section C403.2.4.3.3, IECC 2012. 5. Provide the equipment data and installation information for the built-in hood for the bread oven (equipment number 27). Reference: Sections 301 and 304.1, IMC 2012. 6. Provide the listing information for the Rapid Cook Oven (equipment number 34). Reference: Section 507.1, IMC 2012. 7. Provide general room exhaust for any cooking appliance that does not require the installation of a Type II hood. The minimum exhaust rate shall be 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2012. 8. Clarify the balancing information for exhaust fan EF-A1; the mechanical floor plan shows a total flow rate of 675 CFM but the fan is scheduled for 450 CFM. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 02/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a design for the mounting shelves for the water heaters along with structural calculations to show that the water heaters are safely supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 2. Verify the expected water pressure range for the proposed building with Tucson Water (520-791-2658). Reference: Section 604.6, IPC 2012. 3. Verify that Pima County Wastewater will not require the installation of a hydromechanical grease interceptor for the 3-compartment sink located in the mechanical room. Contact Steve Valencia at 520-724-6209 or steven.valencia@pima.gov 4. Provide an additional cleanout for each 40-foot section of drains having a change of direction greater than 45 degrees (i.e. see the 4" building drain). Reference: Section 708.3.3, IPC 2012. 5. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the two 3-compartment sinks to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 6. Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012. |
| 02/18/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Outdoor Lighting Code. Please address the following electrical plan review comments. #1. Provide compliance with section 402.1 ( color temperature ) of the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. Reflect this on the luminaire spec's and schedules. Ref: IBC sec.107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County |
| 02/25/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/29/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Carioca - Shell & 2 Fuel Canopies T16CM00824, T16CM00829 & T16CM00890 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 29, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. It does not appear that the site plan provided in this set of drawings matches grading plan DP15-0173, the access to the billboard has changed. DP14-0167 will also need to be revised to match the grading plan. 3. Until the building plan has been approved by all PDSD agencies Zoning cannot approve. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 03/01/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET SD1 (DETAIL 11); SHEET S3.1 (DETAIL 108): PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, AND INDICATE ON THE DETAIL. 2. SHEET A0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE EXIT SEPARATION DISTANCE AND BUILDING DIAGONAL DIMENSION ON THE PLAN. 3. SHEET A1.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.0 (ELEVATIONS 3 AND 4): THE ELEVATION TITLES DO NOT MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN NORTH ARROW. PLEASE COORDINATE. 4. SHEET A3.0; ROOF PLAN: AT TWO RTU LOCATIONS, A DETAIL 10/AD1 IS INDICATED. PLEASE REVISE THAT DETAIL REFERENCE. 5. SHEET A3.0; KEY NOTES: PLEASE ADD THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S4.1 TO NOT 15. 6. SHEET A8.0; FLOOR PLAN 1: PER THE 2012 IPC SECTION 405.3.5, WALLS OR PARTITIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED BETWEEN URINALS TO PROVIDE PRIVACY. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN. 7. SHEET S2.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE AND FOUNDATION NOTES. 8. GENERAL: IS THERE A NOTE ON THE PLANS/DETAILS/SECTIONS THAT INDICATES THE WALL STUD SIZES? PLEASE VERIFY. 9. SHEET P3.0; DETAIL 5: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE WATER HEATER. 10. GENERAL: THE SPECIAL INSPECTION FORM FOR THIS PROJECT NEEDS A REGISTRANT'S SEAL AND SIGNATURE, AND A LIST OF THE SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL'S NAME FOR EACH SPECIAL INSPECTION. IS THERE ANY WELDING ON THIS PROJECT? 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/02/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/16/2016 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |