Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T16CM00423
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | No comments |
| 02/12/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. GENERAL: PER THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4, THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE MUST REVIEW AND COORDINATE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR COMPATIBILITY WITH THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE. THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHOULD REVIEW THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED BY CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC AND ADD A NOTATION TO THOSE DRAWINGS, INDICATING THE DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN. 2. GENERAL: THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BY LOOKOUT ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS ARE FOR THE BRIDGE ABUTMENTS ONLY. TWO SETS OF FULL SIZE DRAWINGS (MATCH CONTECH SIZE) MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ABUTMENTS (STAMPED, SIGNED, AND DATED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER). 3. GENERAL: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED BY CONTECH FOR THE BRIDGE DESIGN (STAMPED, SIGNED AND DATED BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER. IN ADDITION, AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE LICENSE MUST ALSO APPEAR ON THE DRAWINGS). 4. GENERAL: A SITE PLAN MUST BE INCLUDED WITH EACH SET OF DRAWINGS, INDICATING THE BRIDGE AND ABUTMENT LOCATIONS, SITE LOCATION, DIMENSIONED BRIDGE PLAN, AND SECTION CUT/DETAIL REFERENCES AS REQUIRED. 5. GENERAL: BOTH THE BRIDGE AND ABUTMENTS MUST HAVE ALL MATERIAL STRENGTHS AND PROPERTIES INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, ALONG WITH DESIGN LOADS. THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE IS LIMITED TO 1500 PSF AT A MINIMUM OF 2'-0" BELOW FINISH GRADE PER THE IBC TABLE 1806.2. 6. SHEET 1 (CONTECH ELEVATION 3); LOOKOUT ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS (PAGE 1): THE ANCHOR BOLTS FOR THE BRIDGE APPEAR TO BE DIFFERENT AS INDICATED; ASTM GRADE 36 ANCHOR RODS ON THE CONTECH SHEET, AND A325 BOLTS ON THE LOOKOUT PAGE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 7. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/17/2016 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Provide documentation showing maintenance responsibility of the bridge. Tucson Code Chapter 26 Article II: Updated SWPP shall be provided to address area around bridge during construction. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |