Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Permit Number - T16CM00114
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/13/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | need to go to state fire marshal |
| 01/27/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A-1.0; STRUCTURE INFORMATION: STRUCTURES 1, 2, 3, AND 4 ARE ALL OVER 3000 SF (6986 SF FOR 1, AND 3880 SF FOR 2, 3, AND 4). PER THE IBC SECTION 406.3.2, THESE STRUCTURES ARE LIMITED TO 3000 SF, AND MUST BE SEPARATED INTO 3000 SF MAXIMUM GROUPS. TO MEET SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS, THERE MUST BE A MINIMUM 4 FOOT CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE STRUCTURE ROOFS, AND A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET CLEAR FROM FACE TO FACE OF THE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAWING CONFIGURATIONS TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. 2. SHEET S1 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES-FOUNDATIONS); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (PAGE 5): THE GENERAL NOTES INDICATE THE SPREAD FOOTING DESIGN SOIL BEARING VALUE OF 3000 PSF AT 2'-0" BELOW FINISH GRADE, WHILE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TABLE INDICATES 3000 PSF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY AT 3'-0" BELOW FINISH GRADE. PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: THE 1, 2, 3, AND 4 STRUCTURES CONFIGURATION WILL BE ALTERED TO MEET THE IBC AREA REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REVISE PER CHANGES TO SHEET A-1.0. 4. SHEET S3 (DRILLED PIER SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 38): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE DRILLED PIER DEPTH REQUIRED IN ASPHALT IS 8.667' (8'-8"), WHILE THE SCHEDULE INDICATES A DEPTH OF 8'-5". PLEASE CLARIFY. 5. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/02/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide in detail, the wiring methods used to perform the supply side tap in the electrical service equipment, including hardware and materials. Also verification from the manufacturer of the electrical service equipment that this installation will not compromise the listings or performance of the equipment. Or provide for a field evaluation and re- listing of the equipment by a NRTL . Ref: 2012 IBC sec.107, 2011 NEC art. 110.3. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/04/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |