Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM00036
Parcel: 11942006J

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T16CM00036
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/02/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change The development package must be approved first.
Once the development package is approved, I will review this over the counter.
02/05/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 4555 S. Mission Road
T16CM00036
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 5, 2016

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The building plans cannot be approved until development package, DP16-0007, has been approved.

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
02/11/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET CS; CODE SUMMARY: FOR THE OCCUPANCY CLASS (NEW), THIS SHOULD BE AN A-3 CLASSIFICATION (GYMNASIUM). ADD A NOTE ON THE DRAWING THAT PER THE IBC SECTION 303.1.1, IT CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS A B OCCUPANCY. IT WILL NOT CHANGE THE SF/OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 (EXERCISE ROOM).
2. SHEET CS; CODE SUMMARY: THE STAIRWAY EGRESS WIDTH IS GIVEN AS 48". THE IBC SECTION 1007.3 INDICATES THE 48" WIDTH IS THE CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN HANDRAILS. THE NORTHEAST STAIR INDICATED ON SHEET a2 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE MET THAT REQUIREMENT. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE.
3. SHEET CS; CODE SUMMARY: PLEASE INDICATE IN THE CODE SUMMARY THE ALLOWABLE AREA FOR THIS BUILDING.
4. SHEET CS; CODE SUMMARY: PLEASE INDICATE IN THE CODE SUMMARY THAT THE PLUMBING REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER CLOSETS, LAVATORIES, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, AND SERVICE SINKS ARE MET.
5. SHEET a1; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE TO STRUCTURAL DETAIL 106 FOR THE NEW WALL IN NOTE 12.
6. SHEET a1; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAVEL DISTANCE TO THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND SERVICE SINK AS LISTED IN THE IBC SECTIONS 2902.3.2 AND 2902.5 ARE MET.
7. SHEET a2; FIRST FLOOR PLAN; SECOND FLOOR PLAN: AT THE FIRST FLOOR PLAN, THE SOUTH STAIR INDICATES A 3'-4" DIMENSION FROM GRID 2 TO THE STAIR COLUMN CERTERLINE, WHILE THE SECOND FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A 4'-0" DIMENSION. PLEASE COORDINATE. REVISE THE DIMENSIONS SO THE STAIR IS A MINIMUM 48" CLEAR WIDTH BETWEEN HANDRAILS PER THE IBC SECTION 1007.3.
8. SHEET a2; FIRST FLOOR PLAN: PER THE IBC SECTION 1105.1, AT LEAST 60% OF ALL PUBLIC ENTRANCES SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. PLEASE VERIFY THAT REQUIREMENT IS MET.
9. SHEET a2; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 5 REFERENCES DETAIL 5/a6 FOR A MASONRY PIER. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE.
10. SHEET a4; ELEVATION KEY NOTES: PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE IRC IN NOTE 1.
11. SHEET a4; ELEVATION KEY NOTES: PLEASE VERIFY NOTE 2 IS LOCATED ON AN ELEVATION.
12. SHEET a5; SECTION KEY NOTES: PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE IRC IN NOTE 1.
13. SHEET s2; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THERE A SW2 INDICATED ON THIS PLAN AS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE ON s1.5? PLEASE VERIFY.
14. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (COVER); SHEET S1 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES-FOUNDATIONS): THE NOTE ON s1 FOR THE ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING (1000 PSF AT 12" DEPTH) DOES NOT MATCH THE CALCULATIONS (1500 PSF AT 18"). PLEASE COORDINATE.
15. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
02/12/2016 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/17/2016 EGALLET1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed