Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Plan Number - T15PI00006
Review Name: PIA - SUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT STREETS DIVISION | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COT WATER NEW DEVELOPMENT | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | PC WASTEWATER MGMT | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | QUEST COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | COX COMMUNICATION | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | SOUTHWEST GAS CORP | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Denied | |
| 03/31/2015 | LINZUNZA | UTILITY CLEARANCES | KINDER MORGAN ENERGY | Denied | |
| 05/04/2015 | JOSE ORTIZ | DOT TRAFFIC | REVIEW | Approved | From TDOT Traffic Engineering Zelin Canchola T15PI00006 Valencia Road Extension: Houghton to Old Spanish Trail. Add to striping note 2. PM1 of PM11: Contact City of Tucson Traffic Engineering 791 4259 for work within City of tucson right of way. |
| 05/08/2015 | GARY WITTWER | DOT LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | No comments on plans. Landscape will be submitted on next review. |
| 05/18/2015 | LINZUNZA | PIA COORDINATOR | CUSTOMER CALLED; PLANS @ AMBASSSADOR | Completed | |
| 05/18/2015 | LINZUNZA | DOT ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Date: May 14, 2015 PROJECT NAME: Valencia Road Extension: Houghton Road to Old Spanish Trail ACTIVITY NUMBER: T15PI00006 PROJECT REVIEWER: Esteban Tineo, PE, DOT Utility Review Section 1. The proposed strip-paved roadway section must include thickened edges. 2. The proposed drainage swales must include erosion protection measures. 3. Drainage Report detailing the proposed roadway drainage infrastructure must be submitted for review. 4. Since the proposed improvements (new Bridge crossing at Pantano Wash) will significantly alter the FEMA floodplain, a CLOMR and LOMR must be processed. 5. CMG Bridge Drainage Report a. Provide 500-year Bridge scour analysis b. Bridge Scour analysis must also include the 500-year Flood, or over-topping (whichever is less), in accordance to ADOT criteria. Moreover, pressure flow scour depths must also be added to the typical pier scour results for pressure flow conditions. c. It appears that the proposed pilot channel (upstream of the proposed Bridge) slope is not set to the Design Equilibrium Slope for sediment transport balance. Based on the proposed conditions mapping, the distance between cross section 16 and 9 is about 1200-feet, and per the HECRAS output, the difference in channel elevation is 13.01-feet ( 2879.00 - 2865.99 ), which works to a proposed pilot channel slope of 0.011-feet / feet. Since the proposed channel slope is not equal, but much steeper than the design equilibrium slope (Slope Channel Design = 0.011 > Equilibrium Slope = 0.0041), then the proposed channel is likely to erode both vertical and horizontally. Moreover, this may cause the upstream channel bend to break towards and possibly behind the proposed west channel soil cement. d. The report should show the proposed and existing floodplains. In addition, how will the existing wide floodplain be captured by the proposed pilot channel? e. Will the proposed pilot channel cross section maintain its integrity during flow events? Will this pilot channel need to be bank protected? f. The Bridge Scour analysis mentions the use of the City scour equation, but it does not use apply it correctly. The City sour equation (equation 6.3) includes a 1.3 factor that is multiplied to the aggregate scour values not 1.0. Revise. g. 100year Bridge Scour; Using both the Hydraulic Depth and Max Depth (16.63 and 17.8), and the other values provided, I calculated Pier Scour depths of 19.17-feet and 19.63-feet, but your calcs show 12.92-feet? Please check and revise. h. Provide the 500-year or overtopping scour analysis. |
| 05/18/2015 | LINZUNZA | PIA COORDINATOR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed | |
| 05/18/2015 | LANCE PETERSON | DOT STREET MAINTENANCE | REVIEW | Denied | Date: May 12, 2015 Activity Number: T15PI00006 - Valencia Road Extension Reviewer: James Femling, Streets & Traffic Maint. Comments: No comments on this project at this time. |