Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM08921
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2016 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of development package DP15-0194. The building plans must conform to the approved development package plans. |
| 01/12/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/15/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) The water supply site survey report needs an Arizona Registered Engineeering seal instead of a Nevada Registered Engineering Seal. The Floodplain Use Permit application needs to be completely filled out and signed. The permit conditions and restrictions provided in the returned packet also need to be signed and dated. |
| 01/20/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/20/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the temperature mixing valve specified for the lavatory L11 is listed as conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Verify that separate indirect waste pipes will be provided for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 3. Identify the extent of each combination waste and vent system, the vent associated with each system, and verify that the size of the combination waste and vent pipe complies with the total number of waste fixture units discharging through the combination waste and vent system. Reference: Section 915.3, IPC 2012. 4. Provide calculations to show that the siphonic roof drainage system has been designed in accordance with ASME A112.6.9 and ASPE 45. Reference: Section 1107.1, IPC 2012. 5. Secondary roof drainage is intended to prevent ponding on the roof that exceeds the structural capacity of the roof when there is no flow through the primary roof drains (Section 1101.7, IPC 2012). Provide calculations to show that the proposed roof scuppers are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load. The maximum ponding level shall include the head on the scupper required for the flow through the scupper to equal the design flow for the roof drainage (Section 1106.1, IPC 2012). Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. |
| 01/20/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the size of the proposed water meter and the total demand it will be serving. |
| 01/21/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET C1; APPLICABLE CODES: PLEASE REMOVE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE REFERENCE TO THE 2012 EDITION (THE 2009 EDITION IS USED). 2. SHEET C1; NUMBER OF EXITS: A NOTE INDICATES 'FOUR (4) EXITS ARE PROVIDED PER TABLE 1019.1'. PLEASE REVISE THAT TABLE REFERENCE. 3. SHEET C1; EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.1. 4. SHEET C1; BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: THE GROSS FLOOR AREA REFERENCES THE IBC SECTION 1002.1. PLEASE REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 5. SHEET C1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE CODE REQUIREMENT TABLES. 6. SHEET C1; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS: PLEASE ADD TO THIS TABLE THE REQUIREMENT OF A SERVICE SINK (1 REQUIRED, 1 PROVIDED). 7. SHEETS FX1, LS1, A1, A1.1, A1.2, AND A1.3: PLEASE PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 8. SHEETS A2 AND A2.1; BUILDING ELEVATIONS: PLEASE VERIFY THE DIMENSION NOTES ON THE ELEVATIONS INDICATING 'REFERENCE STRUCTURAL' ARE SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS. PLEASE ADD A SHEET NUMBER REFERENCE TO EACH OF THESE DIMENSION NOTES ON A2 AND A2.1. 9. SHEET A5; ENLARGED PLAN 2: NEAR THE MOP SINK, AN ELEVATION REFERENCE INDICATES 5-A7. PLEASE REVISE THAT REFERENCE. 10. SHEET A6.1; PARTITION LEGEND: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET WHERE THESE PARTITION TYPES ARE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. ARE THEY ONLY ON ENLARGED PLANS? 11. SHEET S0; GENERAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): NOTE 2.2 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED ON THIS PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 12. SHEET S0; TEMPORARY TRUCK ACCESS WALL: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS (FOUNDATION AND ROOF FRAMING) WHERE THIS WALL OCCURS. 13. SHEET SP2.1; SECTIONS 5 AND 6: A BOXED NOTE INDICATES TO 'REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR REINFORCING AND FOUNDATION INFORMATION'. PLEASE ADD TO REFERENCE STRUCTURAL SHEET S1 AND DETAIL 9-S2. 14. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PLEASE PROVIDE ROOF FRAMING AND FOUNDATION KEY PLANS IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR LOCATING THE BEAM, COLUMN, WALL, AND FOOTING DESIGNS. 15. GENERAL: THE STORAGE RACK CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS MAY BE SUBMITTED WITH THE BUILDING DRAWINGS, BUT MUST HAVE A SEPARATE PERMIT NUMBER AND VALUATION. TWO SETS OF THE PLAN WITH THE RACKS LOCATED AND IDENTIFIED WILL BE REQUIRED. RACKS WITH HEIGHTS UP TO 6 FEET TALL MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLAN. RACKS WITH HEIGHTS OVER 6 FEET UP TO 12 FEET TALL MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLAN, AND INCLUDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS OF THE CONNECTION OF THE RACK TO THE FLOOR. RACKS WITH HEIGHTS OVER 12 FEET TALL MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PLAN, INCLUDE A DETAIL ON THE DRAWINGS OF THE CONNECTION OF THE RACK TO THE FLOOR, AND INCLUDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE RACK AND CONNECTION DESIGNS. 16. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/25/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 01/28/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide complete compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. Can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |