Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM08834
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | All plumbing drawings are marked "Preliminary, not for construction" |
| 01/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | All mechanical drawings are marked "Preliminary, not for construction" |
| 01/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | All plumbing drawings are marked "Preliminary, not for construction" |
| 01/11/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/14/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. |
| 12/22/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 835 N. Park Avenue - Foundation Only T15CM08834 Foundation Only Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 30, 2015 1. The foundation only plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning will not approve until a development package as been submitted and approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/30/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET S107; SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR LOAD KEY PLANS: THE LOAD KEY PLAN INDICATES A UNIFORM 40 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD FOR THE PARKING AREAS. THE IBC TABLE 1607.1 (NOTE a) ADDS THAT ALTERNATIVE DESIGN LIVE LOADS (CONCENTRATED) SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THAT FLOOR DESIGN. HAS THE CONCENTRATED LIVE LOAD OPTION BEEN APPLIED? PLEASE VERIFY. 2. SHEET S107; FOURTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN: A ROOF AREA BETWEEN GRIDS 7 AND 8.5 AND BETWEEN GRIDS D.4 AND J INDICATES A 100 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD. PLEASE VERIFY THAT LOAD IN THIS LOCATION. 3. SHEET S107; FOURTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN: AT THE PLANTER AREA BETWEEN GRIDS D.4 AND J AND NORTH OF GRID 7, THE LOAD KEY PLAN INDICATES A 20 PSF (REDUCIBLE) LIVE LOAD AND AN ADDITIONAL 275 PSF DEAD LOAD. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS (SHEET S101) HOW THAT DEAD LOAD WAS DETERMINED. 4. SHEET S107 (FOURTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN); REFERENCE SHEET A204 (FLOOR PLAN): THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET INDICATES THE PLANTER AREA BETWEEN GRIDS D.4 AND J AND NORTH OF GRID 7 EXTENDS TO GRID 4 ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE TERRACE. SHOULD THOSE PLANTER LOADS BE INDICATED ON THE LOAD KEY PLAN? PLEASE VERIFY. 5. SHEETS S107 AND S108; FOURTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN; ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLANS: THE ROOF TERRACE AREA ON THE FOURTH AND TWELFTH FLOOR PLANS INDICATES A 150 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD, WHILE THE TERRACE AREA ON THE ELEVENTH FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A 100 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD. PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET S108; ELEVENTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN: THE POOL AREA INDICATES A 100 PSF (UNREDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD AND AN ADDITIONAL 350 PSF DESIGN DEAD LOAD. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS (SHEET S101) HOW THAT DEAD LOAD WAS DETERMINED. 7. SHEET S108; ELEVENTH FLOOR LOAD KEY PLAN: A PLANTER AT THE SOUTH END OF THE POOL INDICATES A 20 PSF (REDUCIBLE) DESIGN LIVE LOAD AND AN ADDITIONAL 500 PSF DESIGN DEAD LOAD. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS (SHEET S101) HOW THAT DEAD LOAD WAS DETERMINED. 8. SHEET S201 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 23): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN CC1-4 HAS 10-#10 VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT AT THE FOURTH FLOOR LEVEL, WHILE THE CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE (SHEET S106) INDICATES 8-#10. THIS IS NOT THE COLUMN AT THE FOUNDATION, AND THEREFORE NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT, BUT PLEASE VERIFY THE COLUMN REINFORCING ABOVE THE FOUNDATION ON THE DRAWINGS MATCHES THE CALCULATIONS. 9. SHEET S201 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 73): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN CC6-1 HAS 8-#10 VERTICAL REINFORCING AT THE FIRST FLOOR LEVEL, WHILE THE CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE (SHEET S106) INDICATES 8-#7. PLEASE VERIFY. 10. SHEET S201 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 86): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE COLUMN CC7-1 HAS 8-#10 VERTICAL REINFORCING AT THE FIRST FLOOR LEVEL, WHILE THE CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE (SHEET S106) INDICATES 8-#7. PLEASE VERIFY. 11. SHEET S201; FOUNDATION PLAN: DETAIL 115 IS CUT AT THE EAST AND WEST WALLS OF THE 5" RAMP, BUT NO DETAIL 115 WAS LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE. 12. SHEET S201; FOUNDATION PLAN: DETAIL 124 IS CUT AT A RAMP BETWEEN GRIDS 1 AND 2 AND BETWEEN GRIDS C AND D. IS THIS DETAIL CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION? PLEASE VERIFY. 13. SHEET S401; DETAIL 104: IN NOTE 3, PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE TO DETAIL 103 FOR THE TYPICAL STEM WALL REINFORCING. 14. SHEET S401; DETAIL 102: NOTE 3 INDICATES DOWELS PER DETAIL 101. NO DOWELS ARE INDICATED IN DETAIL 101. PLEASE CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S401; DETAIL 105: NOTE 9 SHOULD BE MOVED ON THE DETAIL FROM THE CAISSON TO THE COLUMN. 16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 123: CAISSON CF5 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE KEY PLAN. PLEASE ADD. 17. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |