Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T15CM08803
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/09/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The currently specified water heater does have a maximum gas input of 180 MBH but it also has a maximum flow rate of 4.5 GPM at a 77-degree Fahrenheit temperature rise. Also, what is the source of the fixture units used to determine the water demand? Based on the 2012 UPC, 15 fixture units would have an 11-GPM demand, not 8-GPM. [Initial comment: The specified water heater has a maximum flow rate of 9.8 GPM. Show that the hot water demand for the proposed fixtures can be accommodated by the water heater. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 607.1, IPC 2012.] 2. The horizontal distance from the water heater to each of the restroom lavatories is approximately 45-feet; include the vertical pipe sections when determining if the developed length of the hot water piping is greater than 50-feet. [Initial comment: Verify that the developed length of hot water piping from the water heater to the furthest load is no greater than 50-feet. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012.] 3. Placing a copy of the initial comment on the drawing does not resolve the issue. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each directly-connected appliance that does not have a listed, integral backflow preventer or an integral air gap. See sheet P-4. [Initial comment: Appliances (e.g. chemical dispensing systems, ovens, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. (Note that water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022.) Reference: Sections 608.1, 608.3, and 608.16.1, IPC 2012.] 4. General Notes 4 and 13 on sheet P-2 are contradictory: the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation. In addition, a backwater valve will be required, not a backflow valve. [Initial comment: The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation. Provide backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 5. Comment not resolved. Revise the waste and vent isometric to show the five floor sinks with traps. [Initial comment: Clarify the installation of the floor sinks as shown on the sewer isometric (i.e. traps?) and coordinate the isometric with the plumbing plan to clearly show which fixtures are connected to the grease waste or to the sanitary waste and to include all of the fixtures shown on the plumbing plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 6. Specify how the contractor is to provide protection for the trap seals. [Initial comment: Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Section 1002.4, IPC 2012.] |
| 03/10/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the equipment schedule with the manufacturer's efficiency data. The values currently shown on the schedule as "EER" actually appear to be the IEER values for a single-speed indoor motor (RTU-1) and for a 2-speed indoor motor (RTU-2). Note 3 however calls for 2-speed indoor motors for both units which would give RTU-1 an IEER of 13.8 instead of the 13.0 value shown. Table C406.2 (1), IECC 2012 requires a 12.34 IEER for an AC unit with gas heat and a cooling capacity of 65 to 240 MBH. [Initial comment: Verify that the energy efficiency rating (EER) for each specified HVAC unit in the equipment schedule is supported by the manufacturer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. The outside air hood for RTU-1 is within ten-feet of exhaust fan EF-1. [Initial comment: The locations and capacities of the new HVAC units have been changed from those shown for the building shell. Provide new structural drawings and calculations to verify that the installation of the new rooftop units will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.] 3. Sheet M-1 shows 600 CFM of exhaust for EF-2 but on sheet M-2 EF-2 has 850 CFM of exhaust. [Initial comment: Coordinate the balancing data for EF-2 as shown on sheet M-1 with the scheduled exhaust volumes for hoods H-1 and H-2 on sheet M-3. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 4. Balancing data appears to be missing for three diffusers connected to RTU-1 on sheet M-1. [Initial comment: Coordinate the balancing data for AC-1 and AC-2 as shown on sheet M-1 with the scheduled supply air volumes shown on sheet M-2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 03/24/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/30/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |