Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM08803
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/07/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T-1; PROJECT INFORMATION: INCLUDED IN THE 'MEANS OF EGRESS OCCUPANT LOAD' IS A 200 SF PATIO (14 OCCUPANTS). THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A-1.1 (KEYED NOTE 21) INDICATES THAT PATIO. PLEASE SHOW THE PATIO AND SEATING (AND MEANS OF EGRESS AS REQUIRED) ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 2. SHEET T-1.1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 3. SHEET SP-1; SITE PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE THE PATIO ON THE DRAWING. 4. SHEET SP-1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE SCHEDULES. 5. SHEET A-1.1; FLOOR PLAN: AT THE PATIO SEATING, INDICATE THE ACCESSIBLE SEATING LOCATIONS PER THE IBC TABLE 1108.2.2.1. 6. SHEET A-12.1: IS THE U.L RATED WALL REQUIRED ON THIS PROJECT? REMOVE, OR REVISE THE LETTERING TO MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS (3/32" MINIMUM HEIGHT FOR UPPER AND LOWER CASE). 7. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 01/08/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 01/11/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/12/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. List the materials that are to be used for the water service, water distribution, building drains and vents, and the building sewer. Reference: Sections 605.3, 605.4, 702.1, 702.2, and 702.3, IPC 2012. 3. Provide tempered water for the lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012 and Section C404.3, IECC 2012. 4. The specified water heater has a maximum flow rate of 9.8 GPM. Show that the hot water demand for the proposed fixtures can be accommodated by the water heater. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 607.1, IPC 2012. 5. Verify that the developed length of hot water piping from the water heater to the furthest load is no greater than 50-feet. Reference: Section 607.2, IPC 2012. 6. Appliances (e.g. chemical dispensing systems, ovens, etc) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. (Note that water supply connections to beverage dispensers shall be protected with backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022.) Reference: Sections 608.1, 608.3, and 608.16.1, IPC 2012. 7. Clarify the note on sheet P-4 stating that copper pipe cannot be used downstream of an RO unit as compared to detail 1/P-5 which calls for copper tubing being used to supply a beverage dispenser. Reference: Section 608.16.1, IPC 2012. 8. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation. Provide backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 9. Clarify the installation of the floor sinks as shown on the sewer isometric (i.e. traps?) and coordinate the isometric with the plumbing plan to clearly show which fixtures are connected to the grease waste or to the sanitary waste and to include all of the fixtures shown on the plumbing plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 10. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 11. Indirect waste piping that has a developed length greater than 30-inches (30") when measured horizontally or greater than 54-inches (54") in total developed length shall be trapped. Exception: indirect waste piping conveying only clear-water waste (e.g. effluent from a sanitizing compartment) does not require a trap. Reference: Section 802.2, IPC 2012. 12. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Section 1002.4, IPC 2012. 13. Verify that the sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor include all of the fixtures directly or indirectly connected to the grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 14. Hand sinks in the kitchen are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 15. Verify the input ratings for the proposed water heater. The manufacturer's specification shows the unit with a maximum input of 199 CFH, not 180 CFH. (Southwest Gas, the local gas utility provides natural gas with an energy content of approximately 1,000 BTU per cubic foot.) Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 16. Correct the size of the section of gas pipe located between the branch serving the water heater and the branch serving RTU-1; with a load of 180 CFH, it should be 1" in size. Reference: Section 402.2, IFGC 2012. |
| 01/12/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the size of the proposed water meter. Keynote 1 on sheet P-1 calls out a 1" meter but the water calculations on sheet P-3 refer to a 2" water meter. 2. Clarify the size of the proposed water service and backflow preventer. Keynote 1 on sheet P-1 calls out a 1-1/4" water service but the water calculations on sheet P-3 refer to a 2" water service with a 2" backflow preventer. 3. The water calculations on sheet P-3 indicate a total water demand of 40 gallons per minute; Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 37.5 GPM. |
| 01/14/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the new HVAC equipment specified for the project. 2. The mechanical compliance certificate shown on sheet M-1 appears to be for a different building located in Tempe, Arizona. Provide a new mechanical compliance certificate for this building. The building shell was designed using high efficiency HVAC equipment to satisfy the requirements of Section C406, IECC 2012. If this is not being done, show how the requirements of Section C406 will be addressed. 3. Verify that the energy efficiency rating (EER) for each specified HVAC unit in the equipment schedule is supported by the manufacturer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. The locations and capacities of the new HVAC units have been changed from those shown for the building shell. Provide new structural drawings and calculations to verify that the installation of the new rooftop units will not adversely affect the structural integrity of the roof. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. 5. Coordinate the restroom exhaust detail (3/M-2) with the scheduled exhaust fan EF-1 on sheets M-2 and M-3. Update the "Minimum Exhaust Requirements" table on sheet M-2 to show the provided exhaust flow rate that agrees with the scheduled flow rate data. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. Coordinate the balancing data for EF-2 as shown on sheet M-1 with the scheduled exhaust volumes for hoods H-1 and H-2 on sheet M-3. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 7. Coordinate the balancing data for AC-1 and AC-2 as shown on sheet M-1 with the scheduled supply air volumes shown on sheet M-2. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 8. The "Minimum Exhaust Requirements" table on sheet M-2 indicates exhaust for four cooking appliances that are not located under a Type II hood but no exhaust fan is shown for these appliances. Verify the number of cooking appliances and show how the exhaust is to be supplied. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2012. |
| 01/15/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | While the electrical review for the current submittal is approved, due to the potential modifications necessary to address comments associated with the reviews of other disciplines the electrical workflow is denoted as denied in order to verify that those modifications will not adversely impact the electrical review. |
| 12/24/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |