Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM08677
Parcel: 11105063J

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T15CM08677
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to show that the submitted COMcheck analysis applies to the proposed addition to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
01/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the number of drinking fountains that complies with the requirements of Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2012 and Section 410.2, IPC 2012. A "bottled water dispenser" is not an acceptable substitution for the required number of drinking fountains.
2. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans; include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Show the size, slopes, routing, and termination points for the roof drain and overflow roof drain leaders (shown on plan 1/A1.2). Reference: Sections 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
01/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
01/08/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide for a special inspection for Outdoor Lighting as required per sec. 106.2.1 of the Tucson / Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.
#2. Provide for verification in writing from the manufacturer of the existing service equipment stating that the addition of the new 800 amp bussed section is designed for and compatible with the existing equipment and will not compromise the performance or listing of the service equipment. Or provide for a field evaluation by a NRTL to recertify the service equipment.
Ref: IBC sec. 107.2.1, NEC art. 110.3, 230.62.
12/15/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/24/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET A1.0; SITE PLAN; CODE REVIEW (BUILDING AREA): THE SITE PLAN AND BUILDING AREA BOTH INDICATE THE NEW ADDITION IS 7171 SF. THE DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1.2 APPEARS TO INDICATE A MUCH LARGER ADDITION. PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
2. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: UNDER BUILDING AREA, 8618 SF IS LISTED AS A 'B' OCCUPANCY. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS WHERE THIS OCCUPANCY IS LOCATED.
3. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE IBC TABLE 2902.1 INDICATES ONE DRINKING FOUNTAIN PER 400 OCCUPANTS IN F-2 OCCUPANCY GROUPS. THIS WOULD INDICATE A MINIMUM OF TWO DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS WHERE THESE DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE LOCATED. IF THEY ARE LOCATED IN AN EXISTING BUILDING, PLEASE INDICATE THE CALCULATION FOR THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOAD, AND THAT THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS MEET THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE.
4. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE IBC SECTION 1109.2 INDICATES AT LEAST ONE OF EACH TYPE OF FIXTURE, ELEMENT, CONTROL, OR DISPENSER IN EACH ACCESSIBLE TOILET ROOM SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE. WITH THREE EACH MEN'S AND WOMEN'S TOILETS REQUIRED IN THE F-2 OCCUPANCY (217/100 = 3), AND TWO EACH IN THE 'B' OCCUPANCY, THIS WOULD BE A TOTAL OF FIVE TOILETS FOR EACH SEX. IN EACH TOILET ROOM, AT LEAST ONE OF THE TOILETS MUST BE ACCESSIBLE, OR ACCESS TO AN EXISTING ACCESSIBLE TOILET MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN THE ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE. IT IS NOT CLEAR IN THESE DRAWINGS IF THOSE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. IT IS INDICATED THAT 13 TOILETS AND 8 LAVATORIES ARE PROVIDED, BUT THESE MUST BE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, AND ALL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET.
5. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE PLUMBING FIXTURE INDICATES THREE SERVICE SINKS ARE PROVIDED. PLEASE INDICATE THESE ON THE PLANS.
6. SHEET A1.1; DEMOLITION PLAN: KEYNOTE 1 INDICATES AN EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN LOCATED JUST NORTH OF THE EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED (KEYNOTE 9). SHEET A1.2 INDICATES A DIFFERENT AREA OF EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN (KEYNOTE 3). SHEET A1.2 SEEMS TO INDICATE THE NEW BUILDING GOES FROM GRID A TO GRID F (MATCHING SHEET S3.0). PLEASE CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: A NOTE INDICATES THERE ARE 17 PROVIDED EXITS. PLEASE CHANGE THIS TO INDICATE THE NUMBER OF EXITS PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT ONLY, NOT THE ENTIRE BUILDING.
8. SHEET A1.2; FLOOR PLAN: KEYNOTE 19 (TWO LOCATIONS) INDICATED ALONG GRID A IS POINTING TO THE EXISTING BUILDING COLUMNS. PLEASE REVISE.
9. SHEET A2; EXITING PLAN: THE TRAVEL DISTANCES INDICATED ON THIS PLAN DO NOT MAKE SENSE. MEANS OF EGRESS ARE SHOWN PASSING THROUGH SOLID WALLS. PLEASE REVISE THIS PLAN.
10. SHEET A2; REFLECTED CEILING PLAN: SHOULD THERE BE AN EXIT SIGN INDICATED AT THE DOUBLE DOOR (NEAR GRIDS 5 AND B)? PLEASE VERIFY.
11. SHEET S1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES (FOUNDATIONS): THE NOTES INDICATE A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED ON THIS PROJECT. PLEASE PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW (ONE COPY).
12. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/28/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/22/2016 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed