Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T15CM07917
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved; the water meter and reduced pressure backflow preventer are still shown within the building on sheet P2.1. [Initial comment: Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. See the development plan for the location of the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly and water meter. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] 2. Coordinate the estimated peak water flow shown in detail 3/P2.1 and plan 1/P2.1 (130 GPM) to correspond to the demand calculations on sheet P4.1 being used to determine the size of the new water meter. Note that Tucson Water will not allow water meters and backflow preventers to be manifolded to achieve additional capacity as indicated on the water pressure calculations on sheet P4.1. [Initial comment: Based on your calculations, the theater will have a demand of 125 GPM. Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 120 GPM and will not allow water meters and backflow preventers to be manifolded to achieve additional capacity.] |
| 01/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Include a site plan showing the installation of the water service to the building and the installation of the building sewer, including the gravity grease interceptor as part of the building plan set. [Initial comment: An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide a site plan showing the installation of the water service to the building and the installation of the building sewer, including the gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Sections 104.2 and 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Revise the plumbing fixture schedule to show a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle, not 0.5 gallons per metering cycle. [Initial comment: Provide an automatic faucet for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucets will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-03.] 3. The water heater schedule has not been modified to indicate that the water heaters are equipped with an anti-siphon device. [Initial comment: Verify that the specified water heaters are equipped with an anti-siphon device. Reference: Section 504.1, IPC 2012.] 4. With the exception of detail 05/P3.2 which specifies a 1-1/4" CW supply and detail 04/P3.2 which does not show a pipe size, all of the details call for a 1" CW supply to the water closets; a minimum size of 1-1/4" is required to limit the water velocity to less than 8 feet per second. [Initial comment: Verify that the pipe sizes called out for the flush valves will not result in water velocities greater than that recommended by the pipe manufacturer (e.g. limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for copper, PEX, or CPVC piping). At a minimum design flow rate of 25 GPM for a siphonic, flush-valve water closet, a 1" Type L copper pipe has a flow velocity of 9.7 FPS. Reference: Table 604.3, IPC 2012.] 5. The civil drawings U-1 and U-2 provided the needed information but the backwater valve detail on sheet P2.1 should be removed or corrected. The JR Smith model 7022 backwater valve is not made of PVC and is not designed to be accessed as shown in the detail. [Initial comment: Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 6. Provide a cleanout for the vent located within the casework. [Initial comment: Provide accessible cleanouts in the island sink vent system to permit rodding of all portions of the vents located below the flood rim of the fixture. Reference: Section 916.3, IPC 2012.] 7. Comment not resolved. With the exception of roof top units 17A, 17B, 19, and 20, none of the gas input values in the mechanical schedule correspond to the gas input values shown on the gas riser diagram. While most of the input values on the gas riser diagram are greater than scheduled, roof top units 6 and 9 are scheduled for a greater gas input than is shown on the gas riser diagram. [Initial comment: Clarify the disparities between the gas loads indicated for the rooftop units as shown on the diagram of the natural gas distribution system, the gas flows labeled on the main gas pipe sections of the natural gas distribution system, and the gas input loads shown on the mechanical schedule of the rooftop units. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 01/11/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or approved statistical data that documents an alternative occupant density (i.e. provide an appeal to the building official to document the alternative approach - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Appeal_form4.pdf). Reference: Sections 105.2 and 403.3, IMC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show that the ventilation system is sized in accordance with Section 403.3, IMC 2012. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012 and Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012.] 2. According to the equipment list on sheet A3.10, there are 4 popcorn poppers, 2 Henny Penny heated merchandisers, 2 hot dog grills, 1 convection oven, and 1 cookie oven for a total exhaust requirement of 700 CFM based on 100 square feet for each individual appliance. [Initial comment: Provide general room exhaust for any cooking appliance that does not require the installation of a Type II hood. The minimum exhaust rate shall be 0.70 CFM per square foot, using a minimum area of 100 square feet for each individual appliance. Reference: Section 507.2.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 01/11/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Theater @ Tucson Market Place T15CM7917 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 11, 2016 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan for compliance with development package DP15-0138. The plans appear to match the development package but Zoning cannot approve until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the plan. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/15/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comment, also provide a written response. #1. As per the last electrical plan review comment #1. The request to provide complete compliance with the Tucson / Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code was not demonstrated on the corrected plan documents. Also a written response was not found. Please review sections 104.2 through 104.3 for plan submittal requirements. The Outdoor Lighting Code can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd, if desired. Ref: IBC sec. 107.2.1, Tucson / Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 01/26/2016 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/28/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |