Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Permit Number - T15CM07842
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING/ENGINE/WWM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This residence will have a "fire-flow calculation area"(2012 IFC Appendix B, Section B102 and 105.1) greater than 3,600 sq. ft.: therefore this house will require a residential sprinkler system unless the fire flow in the nearest hydrant is a minimum of 2,000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 psi residual pressure. Have a licensed fire sprinkler contractor perform a flow test. Provide notes on plan regarding verification of fire flow or intent to install a fire sprinkler system. If a system will be installed, residential or quick response sprinklers shall be used. The sprinkler system may be connected to the domestic water supply, provided the required design density can be met. Be advised that Tucson Water will not allow a residential sprinkler system to be supplied by a 5/8" meter. A minimum of ¾" meter will be required by Tucson Water. Residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in accordance with the 2012 IFC and NFPA 13D. |
| 11/20/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: T15CM07842 2154 S Little Dipper Drive New Single Family Dwelling TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 20, 2015 DUE DATE: November 30, 2015 COMMENTS: Address the following zoning comments. 01. Zoning has reviewed permit application and plans for the new SFR for compliance with the Zoning review requirements in an R-1 RCP development for Wild Cat Pass Subdivision. 02. While the plan complies with the tentative plat requirements as it applies to the Zoning review purview, the plan is within a Hillside and ERZ overlay zones and must be first approved by the PDSD Engineering Plans Reviewer. 03. The WASH Study Area Limit line that crosses the property must be depicted and annotated on the site and grading sheets. 04. Label within the building footprint the height of the building. 05. Zoning is willing to approve the plans over the counter once the Engineering reviewer has completed their review and approved and signed the plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 11/25/2015 | SHARPER | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Date: 11-24-2015 Activity: T15CM07842 Address: 2154 S. LITTLE DIPPER DR. This letter reflects comments to be addressed. The purpose of this review is to verify compliance to the 2012 International Residential Code and local amendments. In order to facilitate a shorter back check time, we request that you provide two complete sets of revised plans and calculations, along with a written response to each of the noted items indicating action taken. Other comment references may be derived from additional codes and standards adopted by The City of Tucson. All features have been checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided for review. All portions of this project are assumed to meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approved FOUNDATION PLANS: Notate and detail minimum reinforcing. 1. Stem walls, R404.1.1. Specify the width of stem wall detail 3 sheet S2.0 and if there is any reinforcing in the stem wall. 2. Wood framing members supporting exterior walls must be 8" from grade per R317.1.2 STRUCTURAL PLANS: 1. Shear wall "C" contains two #2 windows . The area for these windows does not seem to be removed from the area of that shear wall calculations. Provide a detail showing how forces are being transferred around the open window spaces, or recalculate and reconfigure hold down locations. Steven Harper City of Tucson Planning & Development Services |
| 11/25/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions regarding Hillside and ERZ overlay zones have been addressed. |
| 12/28/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T15CM07842 is the building plan set for 2154 S Little Dipper. Address the following comments related to the grading plan sheet 1.1 for lot 26 of Wildcat Pass: 1) Start an application for a Development Package to include a grading submittal. (2 rolled sets of grading plans, which may be jointly submitted or submitted separately from building plan set). 2) Submittal also with grading submittal, an application for a floodplain use permit per Final Plat. 3) Add the following items to the grading plan sheet 1.1: a) Add "DP15-0xxx" to grading plan sheet and any other sheets with in the Development Package. b) Add the following as a note: Call for Pre-construction meeting. For a PDSD Engineering Inspection, call IVR (791-3111), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning & Development Services Department - Angie 837-4917, or contact PDSD Engineering at 837-4888, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html c) Copy of approved plan/permit DP15-0XXX shall be kept at site at all times until final grading approval. d) Add the following as a note: There shall be no disturbance outside of the disturbance/grading limits as shown on approved grading plans. e) Add the following as a note: PDSD Inspector shall be called to inspect special grading, such as drainage swales, retaining walls, slope or erosion protection when under construction. f) Add the following as a note: If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. g) Add the following as a note: Revisions to the design must be discussed with a Civil Engineer at the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division, prior to any construction activity, to determine whether additional details, calculations, drainage statement, or a revised grading plan is needed, or, whether changes may be provided on as-builts. All work completed without approval is subject to Stop Work Order. h) Add the following as a note: Permittee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage improvements and their permanent protective devices, and all permanent erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and all conditions of permit are completed. Any revegetated areas may require Landscaping approval of established vegetation prior to Final Grading Approval. Any other exposed flat areas that are not reseeded shall be covered in gravel, unless other material is proposed, reviewed, and accepted by City of Tucson. i) Add the following as a note: Per Hillside Development Zone requirements, all slopes shall have hand-placed rip rap with filter fabric. j) Add the following as a note: any slopes that exceed 3:1(H:V) shall have rip rap with filter fabric. k) Add the following as a note: (if applicable) no slopes shall exceed 2:1(H:V) unless geotechnical report recommendations with proposed slope design are provided to the City for review. l) Add the following as a note: Temporary erosion and sediment control devices shall be placed at locations where stormwater runoff exits grading limits to prevent debris, construction silt, and/or chemicals from entering streets or any drainage ways. Any interim erosion and sediment controls that are installed should be maintained, per approved plans or per EOR, at downstream areas of disturbance limits. These interim controls must be removed after all permanent controls have been established. m) Add the following as a note: As-builts are required to show finished pad, finished floor elevation, location of septic (outside erosion hazard setback and floodplain), and any as-built elevations as deemed necessary by the RLS. Submit as-builts as a 'Revision' to the grading permit prior to final grading inspection. Project Engineering completion letters, as well as As-builts are required to be submitted prior to final Grading Inspection. Letter of certification from a Geotechnical Engineer of Record for project substantial completion may be required and submitted prior to final grading inspection. As-builts should include as-built elevations for finished pad grades, front of driveway at street elevation, and other areas as deemed needed by surveyor. n) Revise note regarding septic that any infrastructure for septic area shall not be located in the Erosion Hazard setback area or floodplain. 4) Clearly delineate disturbance/grading limits on planview. It may be necessary to show location of septic system and field (this will not be included in any HDZ calculations). 5) On planview, label locations of temporary construction fencing within 5-ft of the property limits. Keep in mind that there is a 2-ft setback for grading limits from lot lines. 6) Label contour line at top of lot on planview. 7) Add note for Cut and Fill quantities in cubic feet or cubic yards. 8) Label gas, electric, and water lines from house to utility pedestal at street. 9) It appears that 1:1(H:V) slopes may be proposed in several locations. A Soils Report with geotechnical recommendations will be needed for slopes greater than 2:1(H:V). Revise and clarify slope grade and slope treatment based on geotechnical recommendations. 10) Label / clarify rip-rap slope at north side of proposed driveway as existing. 11) Clarify erosion protection or header curb along edges of driveway. 12) Label on both site and grading plan sheets, all the Final plat boundary and flood limit data per sheets 2 and 6 of the Final Plat. https://sahuaro.tucsonaz.gov/maps-and-records/smp-viewer/final-plat-residential-cluster-project-starr-pass-wildcat-pass-lots-1-thru-61-common-area-detention/SMPV7230 https://sahuaro.tucsonaz.gov/maps-and-records/smp-viewer/final-plat-residential-cluster-project-starr-pass-wildcat-pass-lots-1-thru-61-common-area-detention/SMPV7230 If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Dept |