Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T15CM07266
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/21/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/29/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET CS1; DESIGN CRITERIA: THE ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURE IS LISTED AS 2000 PSF. WHERE DID THAT VALUE COME FROM? AN ASSUMED VALUE OF 1500 PSF AT 1'-6" DEPTH MAY BE USED PER THE IBC TABLE 1806.2. PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS AND IN THE CALCULATIONS. 2. SHEET CS1; DESIGN CRITERIA; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: THE ROOF LIVE LOAD, GROUND SNOW LOAD, AND WIND LOAD ARE ALL LARGER VALUES THAN REQUIRED BY THE 2012 IBC. PLEASE VERIFY. 3. SHEET F-1: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE NOTES, SECTIONS, AND DIMENSIONS. 4. SHEETS F-1, A-1, A-6, AND S-1: PLEASE PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 5. SHEET A-1; EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE: ADD A REFERENCE TO NOTES 9 AND 10 TO SEE SHEET P-1 FOR GRAB BAR LOCATIONS. 6. SHEET A-2; ELEVATIONS: PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION TITLES TO REFERENCE SHEET A-2. 7. SHEET A-6; ELEVATIONS: PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION TITLES TO REFERENCE SHEET A-6. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 11/02/2015 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 11/04/2015 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please change the applicable code for the NEC to 2011 on the plan cover sheet. There is no 2012. |
| 11/05/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of DP15-0172 is required. These plans must match the approved development package site plan. |
| 11/10/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Grading Permit is not yet approved, so bldg permit can not be approved. |
| 11/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Plan review for a factory-built building is performed by the Arizona Department of Fire, Building and Life Safety (602-364-1003). The City of Tucson will review the site utility improvements associated with the installation of the factory-built building. 2. Provide the proposed materials of construction for the water service and building sewer. Reference: Sections 605.3 and 702.3, IPC 2012. 3. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is above the first floor elevation or less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 11/12/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |