Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T15CM06858
Parcel: 115151210

Address:
516 W LESTER ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T15CM06858
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/09/2015 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Needs Review Unable to review until Development plan has been approved.
Please review Fire Department comments on the DP. Be advised that if no fire sprinklers are installed, top of storage is limited to 12'-0" AFF
10/15/2015 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 15, 2015
DUE DATE: October 29, 2015
SUBJECT: Lester Industrial Warehouse
TO: Richard Steve Murillo, PE
LOCATION: 516 W Lester
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: T15CM06858
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The main concern is that the comments from the development package (DP15-0166) be addressed prior to approval of this plan. There is also a sheet setup/CAD error where the left 5 inches on all electrical sheets were not included in each sheet. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the Activity number T15CM 06858 and the related development package number DP15-0166 to the Architectural Site and Roof plan on sheet A000.
2) Per AM 2-06.4.8D please show line work for electric line as called out by keynote 11 on sheet 5 of 6, utility plan.
3) Per AM 2-06.4.8D please indicate whether the fiber optic marker as shown on sheet 5 of 6 will be protected in place, removed or relocated. If it is to be removed or relocated, please specify if by others.
4) Per AM 2-06.4.9H5c please show loading zone, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route.
5) Per AM 2-06.4.9N and TSM 7-01.4.3E please show either a depressed landscaping area south of roof scupper on southwest side to contain the roof runoff from the 10 year storm or another scupper under the sidewalk within the right of way to continue to convey this flow into the street without crossing over the pedestrian way. The depressed landscaping needs to be sized with calculations contained in the drainage report. The permission for placing the scupper under the sidewalk in the right of way needs to be obtained from TDOT. Please update sheet 5 of 6 accordingly.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
10/19/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET G100; SUMMARY OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS TABLE; ROOM OCCUPANCY SCHEDULE TABLE; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: PLEASE VERIFY THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THIS BUILDING. THE GOVERNING REGULATIONS TABLE INDICATES 18,225 SF, THE OCCUPANCY SCHEDULE INDICATES 16,160 SF, AND THE ANALYSIS PLAN INDICATES 16,679 SF.
2. SHEET G100; ROOM OCCUPANCY SCHEDULE TABLE: SINCE THIS IS A SHELL BUILDING, NO OCCUPANCY LOAD WILL BE ESTABLISHED AT THIS TIME. WHEN FIRST TENANTS MOVE INTO ONE OF THE SUITES, AN OCCUPANCY LOAD AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SUITE.
3. SHEET G100; CHAPTER 7 (FIRE PROTECTION): THE FIRST NOTE INDICATES THE PARAPET HEIGHT OF THE FIRE WALL SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 30" ABOVE THE ROOF. IT IS INDICATED ON SECTION 7/A200 THAT THE PARAPET IS A MINIMUM 2'-6" ABOVE THE NEW ROOF. THE EXISTING ROOF IS NOT INDICATED ON THAT SECTION. VERIFY ON THE PLANS THE NEW ROOF IS AT A HIGHER ELEVATION THAN THE EXISTING ROOF, AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 706.6 ARE MET.
4. SHEET G100; CHAPTER 7 (FIRE PROTECTION): PLEASE VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 706.5 ARE MET FOR THE HORIZONTAL CONTINUITY WHERE THE FIRE WALL INTERSECTS AN EXTERIOR WALL (IN THE NEW AND THE EXISTING BUILDINGS).
5. SHEET G100; CHAPTER 7 (FIRE PROTECTION): VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 706.2 ARE MET FOR STRUCTURAL STABILITY IN THE NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS.
6. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 14): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A CENTER COLUMN FOOTING AT SUITES 3, 4, 5, AND 6 TO BE 3'-6" SQUARE, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES 3'-0" X 3'-0" (FOOTING F3). PLEASE CLARIFY.
7. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEETS 15 AND 16): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A COLUMN FOOTING AT 1.1 AND 3 TO BE 3'-6" SQUARE, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES 3'-0" X 3'-0" (FOOTING F3). PLEASE CLARIFY.
8. SHEET S1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES: NOTE 1 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY.
9. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: SHOULD DETAIL 102 CUT AT THE NORTH WALL OF SUITE 5 BE CHANGED TO 103? PLEASE VERIFY.
10. SHEET S1.0; PLAN KEYNOTES (NOTE 4): PLEASE PROVIDE (IN THE NOTE) THE #4 DOWEL LENGTH.
11. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL AT THE WEST END OF SUITES 1 AND 2 ADJACENT TO THE FIRE WALL.
12. SHEET S2.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL AT THE WEST END OF THE MIDDLE GLU-LAM BEAMS IN SUITES 1 AND 2.
13. SHEET S3.0; DETAILS 102 AND 104: PLEASE INCLUDE THE SLAB THICKNESS AT THE DIMENSION INDICATION, OR REMOVE THE DIMENSION LINE.
14. SHEET S3.0; DETAILS: PLEASE ADD DETAILS 208, 209, AND 210.
15. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 105: INDICATE NOTE 2 ON THE DETAIL.
16. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 212: AT KEYNOTE 4, PROVIDE THE EMBEDMENT DEPTH INTO THE EXISTING WALL.
17. SHEET A000 (ROOF PLAN); DETAIL 7: NOTE 1 ON DETAIL 7 INDICATES TO 'SEE STRUCTURAL' FOR THE ROOF HATCH FRAME. THE ROOF HATCH IS NOT REFERENCED ON SHEET S2,0, AND TYPICAL DETAIL 10 INDICATES ONLY WOOD STRUCTURE AROUND THE OPENING. PLEASE COORDINATE.
18. SHEET A200; SECTIONS 7 AND 8: VERIFY ON THE DRAWINGS THE EXTENSION TO THE FIRE SEPARATION WALL MEETS THE SAME U.L. LISTING AS THE ORIGINAL WALL (U.L. NUMBER U904).
19. SHEET A000; SECTION 7: A SECTION NOTE INDICATES TO VERIFY THE LADDER DESIGN MEETS THE 2012 IMC CRITERIA. THIS IS THE JOB OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. PLEASE VERIFY THE LADDER DESIGN ON THE DRAWINGS.
20. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/20/2015 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
10/21/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 516 W. Lester Street
T15CM06858
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 21, 2015

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. There are items shown on sheet A000, Site & Roof Plan that are not clearly shown on development package DP15-0166, i.e. ramada ramps etc. Ensure that the Site & Roof Plan match the development package.

3. Until development package DP15-0166 is approved the building plans cannot be approved.

4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
10/29/2015 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Electrical plan sheets not complete due to printing error.
Please provide complete plan sheets for the electrical plan review.
IBC, 107.2.1
11/02/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Include the HVAC demand in the water calculations (a continuous use, not a plumbing fixture). Reference: Section A2.2, UPC 2012.
2. Provide a cleanout for the building sewers prior to the HCS. Reference: Detail RWRD 401.
3. Revise the roof drain calculations to include the actual size of the roof area served by each scupper. Note that a scupper is sized as a weir, not as a downspout. Reference: Section 1106.4, IPC 2012.
4. Provide secondary (overflow) roof drainage for each roof drainage area. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.
11/02/2015 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
11/03/2015 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the component descriptions in the Envelope Compliance Certificate so that they correspond to the components shown on in the drawing set. Reference: Section C103.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Provide documentation for the fenestration components (i.e. doors and windows) used in the Envelope Compliance Certificate. If the NFRC fenestration product certification numbers (CPD#) are not available, show the required U-factors for the fenestration products (and the solar heat gain coefficients for the glazing) on the drawings and state that all fenestration products shall be NFRC certified. Alternatively, you can use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGF from Table C303.1.3 (1), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IEC 2012.
3. Full compliance with the 2012 IECC requires that an "additional efficiency package option" be selected per Section C406. Clarify which of the three options has been selected and coordinate with the mechanical and electrical COMcheck reports.
4. Show how each tenant is to be provided access to the mechanical equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2012.
5. Provide structural details to show how the fan coil units are to be connected to the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/19/2015 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed